On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Brett wrote:
>
>> > >
>> >
>> > Based on what worked for Ryan, I tried with -m 512 instead of -m 1300.
>> > Now I can install and run OpenBSD 5.0 i386 (release). Qemu used to be
>> > able to run on my computer with -m 1300, but apparently not anymore.
>> > 512M is
> > >
> >
> > Based on what worked for Ryan, I tried with -m 512 instead of -m 1300.
> > Now I can install and run OpenBSD 5.0 i386 (release). Qemu used to be
> > able to run on my computer with -m 1300, but apparently not anymore.
> > 512M is enough, anyway.
>
> you may be neglecting to set y
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 10:17:11PM +1100, Brett wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:12:14 -0800
> Ryan Freeman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> > > Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
> >
> > works here on i386-current (rthreads AND vmmap patches)
> > -rwxr-xr-x
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:54:00 +0100
Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 03/09/12 12:17, Brett wrote:
> > OpenSUSE will still not run, even with -m 512 (or -m 800 which I tried as
> > well). It was pretty sluggish through qemu anyway, so no big loss. In case
> > anyone cares, it was stalling after the ke
On 03/09/12 12:17, Brett wrote:
> OpenSUSE will still not run, even with -m 512 (or -m 800 which I tried as
> well). It was pretty sluggish through qemu anyway, so no big loss. In case
> anyone cares, it was stalling after the kernel loaded (the popup box with
> "kernel loading" message, before
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:12:14 -0800
Ryan Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> > Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
>
> works here on i386-current (rthreads AND vmmap patches)
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8.6M Mar 5 16:33 /bsd*
>
>
> qemu-system-i386 \
>
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:59:46 +
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2012/03/08 23:45, Brett wrote:
> >
> > > Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
> >
> > Hi,
> > On amd64 -current (host system) I tried the updated qemu.
>
> Is it built correctly?
>
> Specifically, are all the dependencies built agains
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 03:02:10PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
works here on i386-current (rthreads AND vmmap patches)
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8.6M Mar 5 16:33 /bsd*
tested a win2k3 vm in vnc server mode and tested openbsd
vm in regular sdl output mode:
qemu-
On 2012/03/08 23:45, Brett wrote:
>
> > Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
>
> Hi,
> On amd64 -current (host system) I tried the updated qemu.
Is it built correctly?
Specifically, are all the dependencies built against the same version of
the pthread library?
If you are mixing libraries built ag
> Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
Hi,
On amd64 -current (host system) I tried the updated qemu.
With $ ulimit -d 200, I ran:
$ qemu-system-i386 -m 1300 -no-acpi -monitor stdio -no-fd-bootchk -hda dfly.img
-cdrom isos/dfly.iso -boot d
I tried the above command, and also qemu-system-x86_64
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:00:43PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> On 07/03/12 5:54 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:39:25PM +, Federico Schwindt wrote:
> >>On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
> >>>Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
> >>
> >>anyone tested this?
>
On 07/03/12 5:54 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:39:25PM +, Federico Schwindt wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
anyone tested this?
come on, don't cry later. you know who you are.
on amd64 it segfaults and ge
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:39:25PM +, Federico Schwindt wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
> > Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
>
> anyone tested this?
> come on, don't cry later. you know who you are.
>
on amd64 it segfaults and generally doesn't work with rthreads
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
> Here is an update to QEMU 1.0.1.
anyone tested this?
come on, don't cry later. you know who you are.
f.-
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/emulators/qemu/Makefi
14 matches
Mail list logo
