On 01/14 04:58, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> I was concerned by the JIT issues but with your fixes this looks ready
> to import now. ok jca@
Thanks for your review and testing. I've imported it and hooked it up
to the build. The next step is allowing building of ruby26-* packages
for ruby
On Sun, Jan 13 2019, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On 01/13 05:35, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12 2019, Jeremy Evans wrote:
>> > On 01/12 07:50, Jeremy Evans wrote:
>> >> Thank you very much for the testing and analysis. I can confirm the JIT
>> >> compilation problems on amd64 becaus
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 21:33:53 -0800
Jeremy Evans wrote:
> I think was able to fix both JIT issues.
Your new tarball from Sun, 13 Jan, fixes the JIT problems on my
powerpc machine. "MJIT: CC defaults to /usr/bin/cc"
Old result, broken JIT:
Finished tests in 6145.605596s, 3.2864 tests/s, 371.81
On Sat, Jan 12 2019, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On 01/12 07:50, Jeremy Evans wrote:
>> Thank you very much for the testing and analysis. I can confirm the JIT
>> compilation problems on amd64 because it uses the cached cc path (before
>> it would even get to the __guard_local issues on gcc).
>>
>> Be
On 01/12 07:50, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> Thank you very much for the testing and analysis. I can confirm the JIT
> compilation problems on amd64 because it uses the cached cc path (before
> it would even get to the __guard_local issues on gcc).
>
> Below is a new Makefile that will use dist patches
On 01/12 08:13, George Koehler wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:38:31 +0100
> Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> > make test on sparc64:
> >
> > Finished tests in 7349.921578s, 2.7481 tests/s, 310.4749 assertions/s.
> > 20198 tests, 2281966 assertions, 65 failures, 18 errors, 113 skips
> >
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:38:31 +0100
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> make test on sparc64:
>
> Finished tests in 7349.921578s, 2.7481 tests/s, 310.4749 assertions/s.
> 20198 tests, 2281966 assertions, 65 failures, 18 errors, 113 skips
>
> Lots of errors due to missing symbol '__guard_local'
Missing __guard_local... Are they using ld not cc to link?
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 11 January 2019 18:48:10 Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 25 2018, Jeremy Evans wrote:
Ruby 2.6.0 was released today. Release announcement is at
https://www.ruby-l
On Tue, Dec 25 2018, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> Ruby 2.6.0 was released today. Release announcement is at
> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/12/25/ruby-2-6-0-released/
>
> Some highlights:
>
> * Significant performance improvements
> * JIT Compiler
A bit scary at first, but it looks like the ap
On 12/25 08:34, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> Ruby 2.6.0 was released today. Release announcement is at
> https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2018/12/25/ruby-2-6-0-released/
>
> Some highlights:
>
> * Significant performance improvements
> * JIT Compiler
> * Endless Ranges
> * Function Composition Operato
On 12/26 03:06, vtamara wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> IMHO it is necessary to change in the file pkg/MESSAGE-main
>
> ln -sf ${PREFIX}/bin/bundle26 ${PREFIX}/bin/gem
> ln -sf ${PREFIX}/bin/bundler26 ${PREFIX}/bin/gem
>
> for
>
> ln -sf ${PREFIX}/bin/bundle26 ${PREFIX}/bin/bundle
> ln -sf ${PREFIX
Thank you!
IMHO it is necessary to change in the file pkg/MESSAGE-main
ln -sf ${PREFIX}/bin/bundle26 ${PREFIX}/bin/gem
ln -sf ${PREFIX}/bin/bundler26 ${PREFIX}/bin/gem
for
ln -sf ${PREFIX}/bin/bundle26 ${PREFIX}/bin/bundle
ln -sf ${PREFIX}/bin/bundler26 ${PREFIX}/bin/bundler
Happy chris
12 matches
Mail list logo
