On 2010/06/26 14:47, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:53:35 -0400
> Brynet wrote:
>
> > I know of at least one OpenBSD developer wanting to update their BIOS
> > from OpenBSD.
>
> Sorry, but it's an imperfect world and I'm sure everyone appreciates
> your efforts.
>
> Personally I'd
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:53:35 -0400
Brynet wrote:
> I know of at least one OpenBSD developer wanting to update their BIOS
> from OpenBSD.
Sorry, but it's an imperfect world and I'm sure everyone appreciates
your efforts.
Personally I'd much prefer using a boot disk (OpenBSD or not) or
even a spe
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> I would say that, as a general principle -- if you can't find this and fix
> it yourself, you probably are unable to evaluate the risk from bypassing
> the kernel and talking direct to the hardware.
I haven't looked beyond libpci, I was giving a heads up, given that the
prob
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Port attached and at http://spacehopper.org/flashrom.tgz; this is
> > basically your patches with a typo fixed (missing ; in the Makefile).
> >
> > You can see exampkle output from an unsuccessful run on amd64
> > attempting to dump rom contents at http://spacehopper.
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Port attached and at http://spacehopper.org/flashrom.tgz; this is
> basically your patches with a typo fixed (missing ; in the Makefile).
>
> You can see exampkle output from an unsuccessful run on amd64
> attempting to dump rom contents at http://spacehopper.org/flashrom
On 2010/06/25 00:21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/06/22 04:02, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > Hi Stuart, hi Ian,
> >
> > thanks for the enthusiastic response.
> > I added a few fixups to the flashrom tree in the meantime to get the
> > OpenBSD patch size down a bit. After all, if it gets e
On 2010/06/22 04:02, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Hi Stuart, hi Ian,
>
> thanks for the enthusiastic response.
> I added a few fixups to the flashrom tree in the meantime to get the
> OpenBSD patch size down a bit. After all, if it gets easier for you to
> test, we all win.
>
> Stuart, if this
Hi Stuart, hi Ian,
thanks for the enthusiastic response.
I added a few fixups to the flashrom tree in the meantime to get the
OpenBSD patch size down a bit. After all, if it gets easier for you to
test, we all win.
Stuart, if this works for you, I'll commit the patches into flashrom
subversion AS
I've got a gateway OEM ASUS board with an outdated bios which I'm
happy to test the utility on (can't update the bios with the asus
flash tool as the tool doesn't recognise the board though the board is
a AsusTek CUR-DLS)
Sevan
On 2010/06/19 12:50, Roberto Fernandez wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:42:08AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2010/06/19 02:33, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm one of the lead developers of flashrom, a GPLv2 application to
> > > read/write/erase flash chips on ma
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:42:08AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/06/19 02:33, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm one of the lead developers of flashrom, a GPLv2 application to
> > read/write/erase flash chips on mainboards, network/storage/graphics
>
On 19/06/2010 10:42 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010/06/19 02:33, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Hi,
I'm one of the lead developers of flashrom, a GPLv2 application to
read/write/erase flash chips on mainboards, network/storage/graphics
cards and external programmers. Some people use flas
On 2010/06/19 02:33, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm one of the lead developers of flashrom, a GPLv2 application to
> read/write/erase flash chips on mainboards, network/storage/graphics
> cards and external programmers. Some people use flashrom to update their
> BIOS/EFI or to add net
13 matches
Mail list logo
