> Check that *both* sides use rsync v3; it uses an incremental list
> whereas v<=2 transfer a list of all files at once.
Yep; both sides are running recent -CURRENT snapshots (where recent
is less than or equal to a month old), and both are running rsync
v3.0.7.
> There are various memory limits
On 2010/02/23 15:56, C. Bensend wrote:
> I'll take a guess and say it's probably the process needing a lot
> of memory... I think rsync is trying to calculate a list of all
> the files it needs to transfer, from the error message it spits
> out. So, looking at root's limits:
Check that *both* si
> That probably won't help. Limits do not depend on which shell
> you are using. Only the command to change limits depends
> on which shell you are using.
>
> So, in case your process is really needing lots of memory and
> hitting the limit, changing the limit might help, using the
> apropriate
C. Bensend wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:23:47PM -0600:
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> C. Bensend wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:42:34PM -0600:
>>>I'm running into some problems with my home backup server. It
>>> uses rsnapshot to grab backups from multiple hosts several times
>>> a day, and
> C. Bensend wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:42:34PM -0600:
>
>>I'm running into some problems with my home backup server. It
>> uses rsnapshot to grab backups from multiple hosts several times
>> a day, and saves them to dual 1.5TB drives.
>>
>>Recently, I've begun getting rsnapshot fai
C. Bensend wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:42:34PM -0600:
>I'm running into some problems with my home backup server. It
> uses rsnapshot to grab backups from multiple hosts several times
> a day, and saves them to dual 1.5TB drives.
>
>Recently, I've begun getting rsnapshot failures, s
