On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 18:28:52 +0200
Roland Kuebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd rather have a port for dailystrips (
> http://dailystrips.sourceforge.net/ ):
> "dailystrips is a perl script to automatically download your favorite
> online comics from the web. It currently supports
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 21:19:18 +0200
Alexandre Anriot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, I thought it would be a nice addition, but if it's "refused",
> > > I easily understand that.
> >
> > This is just RFC. What's your opinion, po
> Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, I thought it would be a nice addition, but if it's "refused",
> > I easily understand that.
>
> This is just RFC. What's your opinion, porters?
I agree about the changes you spoke about, alek.
About the regression tests, it see
Hi,
Aleksander Piotrowski wrote:
> Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Well, I thought it would be a nice addition, but if it's "refused", I easily
>>understand that.
>
>
> This is just RFC. What's your opinion, porters?
I'd rather have a port for dailystrips (
http://
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I thought it would be a nice addition, but if it's "refused", I easily
> understand that.
This is just RFC. What's your opinion, porters?
Alek
--
Dwa miesiące temu londyński klub nikogo poza Wyspami nie obchodził. Groził mu
upadek, g
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:39:26 +0200
Aleksander Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > here is a port for the WWW::Dilbert module. It has been tested on i386.
>
> This port doesn't pass its own regression tests. Also, there is no
> $OpenB
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here is a port for the WWW::Dilbert module. It has been tested on i386.
This port doesn't pass its own regression tests. Also, there is no
$OpenBSD$ id at the top of Makefile. I guess that you sould add
PKG_ARCH=* to Makefile.
BTW do we re
