On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 08:55:24PM +1200, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:59:49 +0100
> Zé Loff wrote:
>
> > Not true, I just installed it without having lang/gfortran installed.
>
> While spatstat does not depend directly on gfortran, its dependency,
> deldir, does. Did you c
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:59:49 +0100
Zé Loff wrote:
> Not true, I just installed it without having lang/gfortran installed.
While spatstat does not depend directly on gfortran, its dependency,
deldir, does. Did you compile deldir with g77? I think gfortran could
be removed then.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:26:46AM +1200, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 07:37:52PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> >
> > +1 for nuking it from me too.
> >
> > Ciao!
> > David
> >
> >
> I believe that spatstat module in R requires lang/gfortran to compile. Some
> other useful
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 07:37:52PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
>
> +1 for nuking it from me too.
>
> Ciao!
> David
>
>
I believe that spatstat module in R requires lang/gfortran to compile. Some
other useful modules depend on spatstat, e.g. radiomics.
Please do not delete lang/gfortran, I am in
Il 12 luglio 2016 19:21:33 CEST, j...@wxcvbn.org ha scritto:
>Just like Qingshan I thought that lang/gfortran was the real deal.
>I should have looked closer. Let's forget about the conflict. sthen
>and you proposed to delete lang/gfortran: I think that's a good idea.
+1 for nuking it from me
Tobias Ulmer writes:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:16:48PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> Qingshan Chen writes:
>>
>> > Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
>> > m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
>> > the right pe
On 07/10/16 14:10, Qingshan Chen wrote:
On 07/10/16 01:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2016/07/09 15:47, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 1:10 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports
is using it..
Some R packages require g
On 07/10/16 01:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2016/07/09 15:47, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
On Friday, July 8, 2016 1:10 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is using it..
Some R packages require gfortran to be built. I managed to install
On 2016/07/09 15:47, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> > On Friday, July 8, 2016 1:10 PM, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
>
> > > Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is
> > > using it..
> >
>
> Some R packages require gfortran to be built. I managed to install gfortran a
> f
> On Friday, July 8, 2016 1:10 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is using
> > it..
>
Some R packages require gfortran to be built. I managed to install gfortran a
few weeks ago by manually removing the gcc file that was collid
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:16:48PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Qingshan Chen writes:
>
> > Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
> > m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
> > the right people.
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
Stuart Henderson writes:
> Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is using
> it..
I understand your point, but except for PLIST changes for releases,
gfortran doesn't seem to add much maintenance overhead. And, as
mentioned by the OP, there are still people using it.
Could we just get rid of gfortran? It seems that nothing in ports is using it..
On 2016/07/07 13:16, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Qingshan Chen writes:
>
> > Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
> > m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the ho
Qingshan Chen writes:
> Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
> m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
> the right people.
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, which
> is required by
14 matches
Mail list logo
