On Tue 2008.02.12 at 22:45 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> On Wed 2008.02.13 at 11:37 +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:46:28AM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:44:23PM +0100, Steffen Sch???tz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Second try
On Wed 2008.02.13 at 11:37 +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:46:28AM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:44:23PM +0100, Steffen Sch???tz wrote:
> > >
> > > Second try
> >
> > Hi, is the leak you talk about fixed in p5-DBD-Pg-2.00
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:37:32AM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:46:28AM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> > Hi, is the leak you talk about fixed in p5-DBD-Pg-2.00 ?
> > 2.00 was released today and I would much rather update to that instead.
> >
> > please t
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:46:28AM +0900, Mathieu Sauve-Frankel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:44:23PM +0100, Steffen Sch???tz wrote:
> >
> > Second try
>
> Hi, is the leak you talk about fixed in p5-DBD-Pg-2.00 ?
> 2.00 was released today and I would much rather update to that instead
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:44:23PM +0100, Steffen Sch???tz wrote:
>
> Second try
Hi, is the leak you talk about fixed in p5-DBD-Pg-2.00 ?
2.00 was released today and I would much rather update to that instead.
please test the attached diff
Index: Makefile
=