Am 05.09.23 um 12:50 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
Except it isn't robust to changes - it can just silently fail to apply,
which doesn't happen with a patch.
My worry was that a patch still applies and misses to remove an -s, then
giving you only partial output, which is worse than no output.
I
On 2023/09/04 22:52, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 04.09.23 um 16:30 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas:
>
> > Thanks. I have imported objfw as proposed in your last tarball, except
> > with a simple patch for clarity instead of your ed(1) script.
>
> Thank you!
>
> My reason for using the ed sc
Am 04.09.23 um 16:30 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas:
Thanks. I have imported objfw as proposed in your last tarball, except
with a simple patch for clarity instead of your ed(1) script.
Thank you!
My reason for using the ed script over a patch was that it'll be more
robust to changes. I'l
On Sun, Sep 03 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 03.09.23 um 19:49 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas:
>
>> I don't know which of .SILENT or make -s or the escape characters hide
>> the compiler command lines used to build the object files, but let's
>> find a way to disable this behaviour at lea
On 2023/09/03 20:48, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 03.09.23 um 19:49 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas:
>
> > I don't know which of .SILENT or make -s or the escape characters hide
> > the compiler command lines used to build the object files, but let's
> > find a way to disable this behaviour at
Am 03.09.23 um 19:55 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
yep, exactly. reasons:
- we find that some upstream projects don't understand shared library
versioning, and either increment the version number when not needed, or
don't increment when it is needed.
Upstream handling reads exactly like OpenBSD h
Am 03.09.23 um 19:49 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas:
I don't know which of .SILENT or make -s or the escape characters hide
the compiler command lines used to build the object files, but let's
find a way to disable this behaviour at least in the port.
Attached is an updated port that removes
On 2023/09/03 15:58, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> This would be small enough if the package still built. Moving
> > SHARED_LIBS to 0.0 I get:
> >
> > Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/libobjfw.so.0.0
> > does not exist
> > Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/l
On Sun, Sep 03 2023, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>> This would be small enough if the package still built. Moving
>>> SHARED_LIBS to 0.0 I get:
>>>
>>> Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/libobjfw.so.0.0
>>> does not exist
On Sun, Sep 03 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> This would be small enough if the package still built. Moving
>> SHARED_LIBS to 0.0 I get:
>>
>> Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/libobjfw.so.0.0 does
>> not exist
>> Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/li
This would be small enough if the package still built. Moving
SHARED_LIBS to 0.0 I get:
Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/libobjfw.so.0.0 does
not exist
Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/libobjfwrt.so.0.0 does
not exist
Error: /usr/obj/pobj/objfw-1.0
On Sun, Sep 03 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 03.09.23 um 12:55 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 03 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>>> Am 31.08.23 um 09:56 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer:
>>>
Am 31.08.23 um 08:26 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
>>> SHARED_LIBS += objfw
Am 03.09.23 um 12:55 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas:
On Sun, Sep 03 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Am 31.08.23 um 09:56 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer:
Am 31.08.23 um 08:26 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
SHARED_LIBS += objfw 1.0
SHARED_LIBS += objfwrt 1.0
SHARED_LIBS += objfw
On Sun, Sep 03 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 31.08.23 um 09:56 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer:
>
>> Am 31.08.23 um 08:26 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> SHARED_LIBS += objfw 1.0
> SHARED_LIBS += objfwrt 1.0
> SHARED_LIBS += objfwtls 1.0
I can't remember
Am 31.08.23 um 09:56 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer:
Am 31.08.23 um 08:26 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
SHARED_LIBS += objfw 1.0
SHARED_LIBS += objfwrt 1.0
SHARED_LIBS += objfwtls 1.0
I can't remember how strict we are with these version starting numbers
but iirc we start w
Am 31.08.23 um 08:26 schrieb Stuart Henderson:
SHARED_LIBS += objfw 1.0
SHARED_LIBS += objfwrt 1.0
SHARED_LIBS += objfwtls 1.0
I can't remember how strict we are with these version starting numbers
but iirc we start with 0.1 (?) I don't really mind if this isn't chang
On 2023/08/30 18:34, A Tammy wrote:
>
> On 8/30/23 13:55, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > With ObjFW 1.0 being released yesterday, I thought to package it up
> > for OpenBSD. Please find it attached and if it looks good, it would be
> > great if it could be imported.
> >
>
> Exciting! T
On 8/30/23 13:55, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> With ObjFW 1.0 being released yesterday, I thought to package it up
> for OpenBSD. Please find it attached and if it looks good, it would be
> great if it could be imported.
>
Exciting! Thanks for the port. Built cleanly and all tests passed.
Hi!
With ObjFW 1.0 being released yesterday, I thought to package it up for
OpenBSD. Please find it attached and if it looks good, it would be great
if it could be imported.
--
Jonathan
objfw.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
19 matches
Mail list logo
