Re: New: linuxdcpp

2008-02-13 Thread Andrés
On Feb 13, 2008 11:01 AM, Liviu Daia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13 February 2008, Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could please someone commit this? Even if there are some issues, it's > > way better than the current DC clients in tree. > [...] > > I haven't used DC in a while, but ou

Re: New: linuxdcpp

2008-02-13 Thread Liviu Daia
On 13 February 2008, Andrés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could please someone commit this? Even if there are some issues, it's > way better than the current DC clients in tree. [...] I haven't used DC in a while, but out of curiosity, what's wrong with Valknut? Regards, Liviu Daia -

Re: New: linuxdcpp

2008-02-13 Thread Andrés
Could please someone commit this? Even if there are some issues, it's way better than the current DC clients in tree. This is from Jeremy Evans, but I attach it to ease work. Original message here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.ports/27784

Re: New: linuxdcpp

2008-01-22 Thread Andrés
On Jan 14, 2008 5:20 PM, Jeremy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a new port for linuxdcpp, which is a port of DC++, the most > popular Direct Connect client, to linux/unix operating systems. > > Tested on i386. Works correctly but dumps core on exit. It is > unlikely to work on amd64 as

New: linuxdcpp

2008-01-14 Thread Jeremy Evans
This is a new port for linuxdcpp, which is a port of DC++, the most popular Direct Connect client, to linux/unix operating systems. Tested on i386. Works correctly but dumps core on exit. It is unlikely to work on amd64 as it requires g++ > 3.4 and exception handling was still broken the last ti