Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-11-25 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, [ copious cross-posting stripped ] On Fri, 27.10.2006 at 19:11:32 +0200, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-27 19:07]: > > Todd T. Fries wrote: > > >I definately agree with those previously stating that not all php code > > >supports php

Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-27 Thread Adam
Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We can wait forever, but PHP4 is not really maintained anymore, do you > realise this? It puts servers at risk, unnecessary, I'd say. Yes, it is maintained. It just like -stable, it gets security fixes, but doesn't get new features added. Its no more o

Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-27 Thread Henning Brauer
* Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-27 19:07]: > Todd T. Fries wrote: > > >I definately agree with those previously stating that not all php code > >supports php5 yet. > > disconnecting php4 will help them speed up the transition. bullshit. it leads to pplz building from source, thus hav

Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-27 Thread Marc Balmer
Todd T. Fries wrote: I definately agree with those previously stating that not all php code supports php5 yet. disconnecting php4 will help them speed up the transition. phpBB.com states 'running phpBB 2.0.x with PHP5 is not supported' phpBB is notorious for security problems of all kinds

Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-27 Thread Todd T. Fries
I definately agree with those previously stating that not all php code supports php5 yet. phpBB.com states 'running phpBB 2.0.x with PHP5 is not supported' .. though there is evidence in their changelogs that they are working on support for php5. This is definately not the only codebase in the

Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-22 Thread patrick ~
--- STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 21 October 2006 21:06, Adam wrote: > > "STeve Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PHP5 fixed how many problems over PHP4? > > > > None? > > > > > People should be using 5, so this is the right thing to do. > > > > People "should be u

Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-21 Thread Adam
"STeve Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 21 October 2006 21:06, Adam wrote: > > "STeve Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PHP5 fixed how many problems over PHP4? > > > > None? > > > > > People should be using 5, so this is the right thing to do. > > > > People "should be using

Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-21 Thread STeve Andre'
On Saturday 21 October 2006 21:06, Adam wrote: > "STeve Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PHP5 fixed how many problems over PHP4? > > None? > > > People should be using 5, so this is the right thing to do. > > People "should be using" whatever they need. And some people need > PHP4. There is

Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-21 Thread Adam
"STeve Andre'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PHP5 fixed how many problems over PHP4? None? > People should be using 5, so this is the right thing to do. People "should be using" whatever they need. And some people need PHP4. There is no reason for them to upgrade to 5, so for the people who ha

Re: Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-21 Thread STeve Andre'
On Saturday 21 October 2006 13:29, Robert Nagy wrote: > Hi. > > A couple of us thing that people should switch to php5 > because the php4 ports is not going to be updated. > Everything in the ports tree uses php5 now and we do not > see any reasons to ship whit it. > > It is possible that a lot of

Disconnection php4 from the builds.

2006-10-21 Thread Robert Nagy
Hi. A couple of us thing that people should switch to php5 because the php4 ports is not going to be updated. Everything in the ports tree uses php5 now and we do not see any reasons to ship whit it. It is possible that a lot of people are relying on php4 so we are still going to keep it in the t