On 2013/04/18 08:54, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> > The patch applied cleanly - but I'm still seeing issues with the
> > sqCamera-linux.c, see below, when doing a make install.
> >
> > I'll try and work on it in the next week, and get a diff that works against
> > current.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Fr
On 04/17/13 19:38, OpenBSD wrote:
> On 04/17/13 12:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2013/04/16 07:48, Lars Engblom wrote:
>>> Unless some new obstacles have been appearing, I would really suggest
>>> you upgrade to this port. I have been running it since before the
>>> ports freeze, and it is work
On 04/17/13 12:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/04/16 07:48, Lars Engblom wrote:
Unless some new obstacles have been appearing, I would really suggest
you upgrade to this port. I have been running it since before the
ports freeze, and it is working better (amd64) than the old version.
Those t
On 2013/04/16 07:48, Lars Engblom wrote:
> Unless some new obstacles have been appearing, I would really suggest
> you upgrade to this port. I have been running it since before the
> ports freeze, and it is working better (amd64) than the old version.
> Those times it is crashing (sound events), th
Unless some new obstacles have been appearing, I would really suggest
you upgrade to this port. I have been running it since before the ports
freeze, and it is working better (amd64) than the old version. Those
times it is crashing (sound events), the old version is also crashing.
This means th
On 02/11/13 12:17, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
On 02/11/13 05:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013/02/10 21:11, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
Is it too late for this to go in?
We don't have a proper working diff, Thunderbird mangled the one you
sent (stripped trailing spaces on lines in the manpage diff)
an
On 02/11/13 09:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/02/11 08:18, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>> On 02/11/13 07:32, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> On 2013/02/11 07:17, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
On 02/11/13 05:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/02/10 21:11, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>> Is it too late
On 2013/02/11 08:18, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> On 02/11/13 07:32, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013/02/11 07:17, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> >> On 02/11/13 05:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >>> On 2013/02/10 21:11, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> Is it too late for this to go in?
> >>>
> >>> We don't have
On 02/11/13 07:32, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/02/11 07:17, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
>> On 02/11/13 05:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> On 2013/02/10 21:11, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
Is it too late for this to go in?
>>>
>>> We don't have a proper working diff, Thunderbird mangled the one you
>>
On 2013/02/11 07:17, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> On 02/11/13 05:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013/02/10 21:11, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> >> Is it too late for this to go in?
> >
> > We don't have a proper working diff, Thunderbird mangled the one you
> > sent (stripped trailing spaces on lines in
On 2013/02/10 21:11, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> On 02/10/13 18:50, OpenBSD wrote:
>
> > But that was easy to fix and Scratch 1.4 is running well - with a few
> > hiccups -
> > such as core dumping when importing a 5 Mb mp3 file,
> > and recording sound causing a squeak primitive failure.
>
> Soun
On 02/10/13 18:50, OpenBSD wrote:
> But that was easy to fix and Scratch 1.4 is running well - with a few hiccups
> -
> such as core dumping when importing a 5 Mb mp3 file,
> and recording sound causing a squeak primitive failure.
Sound recording isn't working in Squeak on OpenBSD at the momen
On 02/07/13 06:06, Lars Engblom wrote:
The version in -current is crashing with at least the second game from
this one: http://nostarch.com/download/Super-Scratch-Resources.zip
These games are from this book: http://nostarch.com/scratch
I am using that book for teaching a group of pupils to tak
The version in -current is crashing with at least the second game from
this one: http://nostarch.com/download/Super-Scratch-Resources.zip
These games are from this book: http://nostarch.com/scratch
I am using that book for teaching a group of pupils to take the first
steps towards programming.
On 01/08/13 17:17, Stuart Cassoff wrote:
> On 01/08/13 10:37, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2013/01/08 16:05, Lars Engblom wrote:
>>> 1. Both in current and stable the path to the image is wrong in
>>> /usr/local/share/scratch/iniscratch
>>
>> I've just fixed this one.
>
> Sorry, did not see this
On 01/08/13 10:37, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/01/08 16:05, Lars Engblom wrote:
>> 1. Both in current and stable the path to the image is wrong in
>> /usr/local/share/scratch/iniscratch
>
> I've just fixed this one.
Sorry, did not see this earlier - original email eaten by spam control.
I t
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:56:43PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/01/08 15:37, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2013/01/08 16:05, Lars Engblom wrote:
> > > 1. Both in current and stable the path to the image is wrong in
> > > /usr/local/share/scratch/iniscratch
> >
> > I've just fixed this
On 2013/01/08 15:37, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/01/08 16:05, Lars Engblom wrote:
> > 1. Both in current and stable the path to the image is wrong in
> > /usr/local/share/scratch/iniscratch
>
> I've just fixed this one.
>
> > 2. In stable, I have problem to run the programs made by Scratch
On 2013/01/08 16:05, Lars Engblom wrote:
> 1. Both in current and stable the path to the image is wrong in
> /usr/local/share/scratch/iniscratch
I've just fixed this one.
> 2. In stable, I have problem to run the programs made by Scratch
Do you just mean run them by clicking the green flag (whic
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 04:05:35PM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote:
> 1. Both in current and stable the path to the image is wrong in
> /usr/local/share/scratch/iniscratch
>
> 2. In stable, I have problem to run the programs made by Scratch
>
> 3. With current, I do not get Scratch to open up at all
>
1. Both in current and stable the path to the image is wrong in
/usr/local/share/scratch/iniscratch
2. In stable, I have problem to run the programs made by Scratch
3. With current, I do not get Scratch to open up at all
All this is happening on amd64.
If there is anything I can test for to m
21 matches
Mail list logo
