On Mon 01/02/2021 01:47, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> > On Sat 23/01/2021 18:22, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 23 2021, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> > On 2021/01/23 13:33, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, Jan 22
On Sat, Jan 23 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> On Sat 23/01/2021 18:22, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 23 2021, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > On 2021/01/23 13:33, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Don't think so. If we
On Sat 23/01/2021 18:22, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23 2021, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2021/01/23 13:33, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Don't think so. If we are building on a non-native arch we want to make
>
On Sat, Jan 23 2021, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/01/23 13:33, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
>> >
>> > Don't think so. If we are building on a non-native arch we want to make
>> > sure that lang/ocaml is added as BDEP and RDEP, independent how
On Sat 23/01/2021 13:33, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> > On Fri 22/01/2021 08:19, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> >> > On Thu 21/01/2021 23:29, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Jan
On 2021/01/23 13:33, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> >
> > Don't think so. If we are building on a non-native arch we want to make
> > sure that lang/ocaml is added as BDEP and RDEP, independent how
> > MODOCAML_RUNDEP or MODOCAML_BUILDDEP are used i
On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> On Fri 22/01/2021 08:19, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
>> > On Thu 21/01/2021 23:29, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jan 21 2021, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >> > On 2021/01/21 06:43, Bjor
On Fri 22/01/2021 08:19, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> > On Thu 21/01/2021 23:29, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 21 2021, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> > On 2021/01/21 06:43, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> >> >> On Wed 20/01/2021 21:42,
On Fri, Jan 22 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> On Thu 21/01/2021 23:29, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21 2021, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > On 2021/01/21 06:43, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
>> >> On Wed 20/01/2021 21:42, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Jan 20 2021, Bjorn
On Thu 21/01/2021 23:29, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21 2021, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2021/01/21 06:43, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> >> On Wed 20/01/2021 21:42, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jan 20 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> >> > > (Maintainer timeout)
>
On Thu, Jan 21 2021, Daniel Dickman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:30 PM Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I suspect that most people caring about OCaml in ports have thought
>> about this before, hopefully they can share their ideas. :)
>>
>
> Back in 2012, there was this idea from
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 5:30 PM Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
wrote:
>
>
> I suspect that most people caring about OCaml in ports have thought
> about this before, hopefully they can share their ideas. :)
>
Back in 2012, there was this idea from avsm and chrisz I believe:
https://marc.info/?l=openbs
On Thu, Jan 21 2021, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/01/21 06:43, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
>> On Wed 20/01/2021 21:42, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 20 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
>> > > (Maintainer timeout)
>> > >
>> > > ocaml is currently a RDEP for all ports that are build
On 2021/01/21 06:43, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> On Wed 20/01/2021 21:42, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> > > (Maintainer timeout)
> > >
> > > ocaml is currently a RDEP for all ports that are build with it. This is
> > > unnecessary for a couple of th
On Wed 20/01/2021 21:42, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> > (Maintainer timeout)
> >
> > ocaml is currently a RDEP for all ports that are build with it. This is
> > unnecessary for a couple of them, i.e. net/unison.
>
> As far as I know, programs wri
On Wed, Jan 20 2021, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:
> (Maintainer timeout)
>
> ocaml is currently a RDEP for all ports that are build with it. This is
> unnecessary for a couple of them, i.e. net/unison.
As far as I know, programs written in OCaml should run without the OCaml
runtime installed on ${OCAML
(Maintainer timeout)
ocaml is currently a RDEP for all ports that are build with it. This is
unnecessary for a couple of them, i.e. net/unison. I would like to
propose the addition of MODOCAML_RUNDEP and MODOCAML_BUILDDEP, which are
modelled on python.port.mk.
Default behaviour is not changed. Se
17 matches
Mail list logo