Re: VLC coredumps on OpenBSD 4.1-Beta

2007-03-27 Thread Sebastian Rother
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:35:57 +0100 Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could send ports@ the output from this: > > gdb vlc vlc.core > bt > > it's possibly a problem with VLC rather than the port, though, > and if it can't be reproduced I'm not sure if you'll find somebody > to look

Re: VLC coredumps on OpenBSD 4.1-Beta

2007-03-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/03/26 15:31, David Terrell wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:18:35PM +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote: > > I`ve got a coredump from VLC on OpenBSD 4.1-BETA. > > > > I`ve attached the coredump. Seams to be related to the pthreads. > > Don't do that again.

Re: VLC coredumps on OpenBSD 4.1-Beta

2007-03-26 Thread David Terrell
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 03:18:35PM +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote: > I`ve got a coredump from VLC on OpenBSD 4.1-BETA. > > I`ve attached the coredump. Seams to be related to the pthreads. Don't do that again. Put up a link. -- David Terrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((meatspace)) http://meat.net/

Question about Fluxbox/imlib2 package on 4.1-beta

2007-02-16 Thread Vijay Sankar
Reposting to ports@ in case this is more appropriate here. . I am using 4.1-beta and testing different packages as requested by various maintainers on this list. With pkg_add -v fluxbox, I get the following message. parsing fluxbox-0.9.15.1p0 Dependencies for fluxbox-0.9.15.1p0 resolve to

Re: 4.1-beta

2007-02-13 Thread Markus Schatzl
On Tue, 13 17:43 , Marc Espie wrote: > I'm sorry to say, but you guys are completely clueless. > > The commit to modules.port.mk that says you need to have a current 'make' > binary happened over a month ago, and it's just that: update source, > rebuild make, end of story. Well, you seem to be r

Re: 4.1-beta

2007-02-13 Thread Marc Espie
if-less > >endif > >"/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 239: Need an > >operator > >Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > > > I ran into the same thing. Once the system rebuilt I had to perform the > dreadful pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*

Re: 4.1-beta

2007-02-13 Thread Vijay Sankar
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 06:07, Jesse Scott wrote: > Markus Schatzl wrote: > I ran into the same thing. Once the system rebuilt I had to perform the > dreadful pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/* since the ports built on 4.0 would > not work on 4.1-beta. > > > This happens with

Re: 4.1-beta

2007-02-13 Thread Jesse Scott
/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 239: if-less endif "/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk", line 239: Need an operator Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue I ran into the same thing. Once the system rebuilt I had to perform the dreadful pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/* since the port

Re: 4.1-beta

2007-02-13 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:12:29AM +0100, Markus Schatzl wrote: > On Mon, 12 23:23 , Marc Espie wrote: > > As far as possible, avoid working on -current stuff using a system whose > > uname still says 4.0. Even though we try to avoid it, *every release* > > a few ports (mostly gnu stuff, of course

Re: 4.1-beta

2007-02-13 Thread Markus Schatzl
On Mon, 12 23:23 , Marc Espie wrote: > As far as possible, avoid working on -current stuff using a system whose > uname still says 4.0. Even though we try to avoid it, *every release* > a few ports (mostly gnu stuff, of course) uses hardcoded release numbers > in the weirdest places, and we get br

4.1-beta

2007-02-12 Thread Marc Espie
src/ now says 4.1-beta. People working on ports who have the knowledge to do so should make sure they have rebuilt a 4.1 system, other people will wait for a snapshot. As far as possible, avoid working on -current stuff using a system whose uname still says 4.0. Even though we try to avoid it