On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:07:51AM -0400, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do we have a stance or policy one way or another with respect to -perl
> sub-packages. They tend to go well with many ports that have other
> similar sub-packages, but it's somewhat of a mix. Since perl is in base,
> should
Hi,
Do we have a stance or policy one way or another with respect to -perl
sub-packages. They tend to go well with many ports that have other
similar sub-packages, but it's somewhat of a mix. Since perl is in base,
should we 'guide' towards no -perl sub-packages? Or the other way? Or
allow the
