Re: [maintainer update] devel/codeblocks version 25.03

2025-05-11 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Fri May 09, 2025 at 08:14:15AM -0400, Josh Grosse wrote: > Ping. > > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 01:32:33PM -0400, Josh Grosse wrote: > > After six years, the Code::Blocks IDE has a new release. > > The changelog is at https://www.codeblocks.org/changelogs/25.03/ > > > > Tested on amd64. Commit

Re: [maintainer update] devel/codeblocks version 25.03

2025-05-10 Thread Josh Grosse
Ping. On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 01:32:33PM -0400, Josh Grosse wrote: > After six years, the Code::Blocks IDE has a new release. > The changelog is at https://www.codeblocks.org/changelogs/25.03/ > > Tested on amd64. > diff --git devel/codeblocks/Makefile devel/codeblocks/Makefile > old mode 1007

[maintainer update] devel/codeblocks version 25.03

2025-05-02 Thread Josh Grosse
After six years, the Code::Blocks IDE has a new release. The changelog is at https://www.codeblocks.org/changelogs/25.03/ Tested on amd64. diff --git devel/codeblocks/Makefile devel/codeblocks/Makefile old mode 100755 new mode 100644 index 04f7cf10f03..b765345e6be --- devel/codeblocks/Makefile +

Re: update devel/codeblocks to 20.03 patch level 12751

2022-03-20 Thread Josh Grosse
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 09:49:15AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: [snip] > How about this on top? (Plus maybe go back to the smaller distfile?) > It doesn't inlude the svn date but the rev should be good enough. > > diff -uNp -x CVS -r codeblocks.jggimi/Makefile codeblocks/Makefile [snip] Absolu

Re: update devel/codeblocks to 20.03 patch level 12751

2022-03-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/03/17 06:26, Josh Grosse wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:38:07AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2022/03/16 19:39, Josh Grosse wrote: > > > Yes, thanks! I'll rebuild here and send an updated diff > > > after I've tested. It takes a few hours on this laptop. :) > > New diff atta

Re: update devel/codeblocks to 20.03 patch level 12751

2022-03-17 Thread Josh Grosse
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:38:07AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/03/16 19:39, Josh Grosse wrote: > > Yes, thanks! I'll rebuild here and send an updated diff > > after I've tested. It takes a few hours on this laptop. :) New diff attached. Your recommended changes, plus: * revised

Re: update devel/codeblocks to 20.03 patch level 12751

2022-03-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/03/16 19:39, Josh Grosse wrote: > Yes, thanks! I'll rebuild here and send an updated diff > after I've tested. It takes a few hours on this laptop. :) It took a while here too :) If you find yourself rebuilding ports a few times while you work on an update, you might save some time with

Re: update devel/codeblocks to 20.03 patch level 12751

2022-03-16 Thread Josh Grosse
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:31:34PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > diff --git > > a/devel/codeblocks/patches/patch-src_plugins_contrib_dragscroll_dragscrollcfg_h > > > > b/devel/codeblocks/patches/patch-src_plugins_contrib_dragscroll_dragscrollcfg_h > > index ccf08ff3315..c9aaaee7fc3 100644 >

Re: update devel/codeblocks to 20.03 patch level 12751

2022-03-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
> diff --git > a/devel/codeblocks/patches/patch-src_plugins_contrib_dragscroll_dragscrollcfg_h > > b/devel/codeblocks/patches/patch-src_plugins_contrib_dragscroll_dragscrollcfg_h > index ccf08ff3315..c9aaaee7fc3 100644 > --- > a/devel/codeblocks/patches/patch-src_plugins_contrib_dragscroll_drag

Re: update devel/codeblocks to 20.03 patch level 12751

2022-03-16 Thread Josh Grosse
Attached is the diff I should have sent, with correct WANTLIBS added. On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:12:32PM -0400, Josh Grosse wrote: > Recently, problems with wxWidgets handling and startup have been > noticed with codeblocks 20.03. Upstream has 730+ commits since > 20.03 but have not yet tagged an

update devel/codeblocks to 20.03 patch level 12751

2022-03-15 Thread Josh Grosse
Recently, problems with wxWidgets handling and startup have been noticed with codeblocks 20.03. Upstream has 730+ commits since 20.03 but have not yet tagged any new release or candidates of any kind. Their recent HEAD at revision 12571 seems to solves both issues. I have exported the source tre

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2020-06-25 Thread Josh Grosse
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 04:04:28PM +0200, Charlene Wendling wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:44:06 -0400 > Josh Grosse wrote: > > > Update from 17.12 to 20.03. Builds and runs > > on amd64. Changelog: > > http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/binaries/changelog > > > > As far as x86 is co

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2020-06-25 Thread Charlene Wendling
Hi, On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:44:06 -0400 Josh Grosse wrote: > Update from 17.12 to 20.03. Builds and runs > on amd64. Changelog: > http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/binaries/changelog > As far as x86 is concerned it's good, but it won't build on !x86 because some plugin uses the int3 asm instr

[update] devel/codeblocks

2020-06-05 Thread Josh Grosse
Update from 17.12 to 20.03. Builds and runs on amd64. Changelog: http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/binaries/changelog Index: Makefile === RCS file: /systems/cvs/ports/devel/codeblocks/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.55 diff -u -p

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-12 Thread Josh Grosse
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 03:36:59PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > hrmm. seeing this on i386 but I have no idea why. > > checking for boostlib >= (102000)... yes > checking whether the Boost::System library is available... yes > configure: error: Could not find a version of the library! T

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
hrmm. seeing this on i386 but I have no idea why. checking for boostlib >= (102000)... yes checking whether the Boost::System library is available... yes configure: error: Could not find a version of the library! tail end of config.log follows... configure:21549: checking for FONTCONFIG

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-06 Thread Josh Grosse
On 2018-02-06 09:53, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018/02/06 08:32, Amit Kulkarni wrote: Try doing a pkg_delete -a before doing a pkg_add -u problem solved, Josh had an old copy in openbsd-wip in the ports path. I hate when I think I've git rm'ed and pushed it properly. *headdesk*.

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/02/06 08:32, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > Try doing a pkg_delete -a before doing a pkg_add -u problem solved, Josh had an old copy in openbsd-wip in the ports path.

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-06 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Try doing a pkg_delete -a before doing a pkg_add -u thanks On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Josh Grosse wrote: > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 07:51:24AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2018/02/05 23:34, Josh Grosse wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 08:02:08PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> > >

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-06 Thread Josh Grosse
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 07:51:24AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/02/05 23:34, Josh Grosse wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 08:02:08PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > > > Here's a fixed-up one. Move boost to LIB_DEPENDS, regenerated WANTLIB, > > > > regenerated patches. > > > > > > > >

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/02/05 23:34, Josh Grosse wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 08:02:08PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > > Here's a fixed-up one. Move boost to LIB_DEPENDS, regenerated WANTLIB, > > > regenerated patches. > > > > > > Runtime not tested, anyone fancy taking it from here? > > > > > > > This di

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Josh Grosse
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 08:02:08PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > Here's a fixed-up one. Move boost to LIB_DEPENDS, regenerated WANTLIB, > > regenerated patches. > > > > Runtime not tested, anyone fancy taking it from here? > > > > This diff is good. No issues at all. > > Thanks I'm getting

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> Here's a fixed-up one. Move boost to LIB_DEPENDS, regenerated WANTLIB, > regenerated patches. > > Runtime not tested, anyone fancy taking it from here? > This diff is good. No issues at all. Thanks

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Brian Callahan wrote: > > > On 2/5/2018 4:35 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2018/02/05 14:31, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> On 2018/02/05 09:26, Josh Grosse wrote: On 2018-02-05 07:41, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >>> When I ran 'make update-patches' some patches

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Brian Callahan
On 2/5/2018 4:35 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/02/05 14:31, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2018/02/05 09:26, Josh Grosse wrote: >>> On 2018-02-05 07:41, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> When I ran 'make update-patches' some patches got regenerated. >> Also, when I ran 'make port-lib-depends

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/02/05 14:31, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/02/05 09:26, Josh Grosse wrote: > > On 2018-02-05 07:41, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > When I ran 'make update-patches' some patches got regenerated. > > > > > Also, when I ran 'make port-lib-depends-check' I got some complaints > > > > > abo

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/02/05 09:26, Josh Grosse wrote: > On 2018-02-05 07:41, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > > > When I ran 'make update-patches' some patches got regenerated. > > > > Also, when I ran 'make port-lib-depends-check' I got some complaints > > > > about > > > > boost_system.7 missing. > > > > > > I recei

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Josh Grosse
On 2018-02-05 07:41, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > When I ran 'make update-patches' some patches got regenerated. > Also, when I ran 'make port-lib-depends-check' I got some complaints about > boost_system.7 missing. I received a similar NOT_REACHABLE error, for boost_system.8 (which is -current) duri

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> > When I ran 'make update-patches' some patches got regenerated. > > Also, when I ran 'make port-lib-depends-check' I got some complaints about > > boost_system.7 missing. > > I received a similar NOT_REACHABLE error, for boost_system.8 (which is > -current) > during one build, but it was not a

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-05 Thread Josh Grosse
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:38:03AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote: > Hi Josh -- > > On 02/04/18 23:34, Josh Grosse wrote: > > Update from 16.01 to 17.12. > > > > Changelog: > > http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/binaries/changelog > > > > Initial testing underway on amd64. Builds, and runs. > >

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-04 Thread Brian Callahan
Hi Josh -- On 02/04/18 23:34, Josh Grosse wrote: Update from 16.01 to 17.12. Changelog: http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/binaries/changelog Initial testing underway on amd64. Builds, and runs. When I ran 'make update-patches' some patches got regenerated. Also, when I ran 'make port-lib

[update] devel/codeblocks

2018-02-04 Thread Josh Grosse
Update from 16.01 to 17.12. Changelog: http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/binaries/changelog Initial testing underway on amd64. Builds, and runs. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /systems/cvs/ports/devel/codeblocks/Makefile,v retrie

[break/fix update] devel/codeblocks

2017-10-16 Thread Josh Grosse
Return to gcc4 to prevent abort on initialization on clang archs. Ref: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=150815081112094&w=2 Fix tested on -current and -stable on amd64. Patches for both attached. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /s

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2016-02-02 Thread Michael McConville
Josh Grosse wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:09:38PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 08:28:31AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote: > > > Update to 16.01. Builds and runs on amd64, with ongoing testing in > > > progress. > > > > > > Significant app changes: 6 years of developm

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2016-01-30 Thread Josh Grosse
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 03:09:38PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 08:28:31AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote: > > Update to 16.01. Builds and runs on amd64, with ongoing testing in progress. > > > > Significant app changes: 6 years of development in $WRKSRC/ChangeLog > > > > Si

Re: [update] devel/codeblocks

2016-01-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 08:28:31AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote: > Update to 16.01. Builds and runs on amd64, with ongoing testing in progress. > > Significant app changes: 6 years of development in $WRKSRC/ChangeLog > > Significant port changes: > > * wxmathplot library added > * new dependenc

[update] devel/codeblocks

2016-01-29 Thread Josh Grosse
Update to 16.01. Builds and runs on amd64, with ongoing testing in progress. Significant app changes: 6 years of development in $WRKSRC/ChangeLog Significant port changes: * wxmathplot library added * new dependency on devel/libtool for libtoolize and automake pre-patch * assigning mainta