Re: [update] Python 3.8.7

2021-01-03 Thread Daniel Dickman
> On Jan 3, 2021, at 4:57 PM, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 09:43:39PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> ..so I think I've got everything for 3.8.7 now. > >> https://junkpile.org/diff.py387 if anyone wants to read it - > >> 260 files changed, 1371 insertions(+), 1156 de

Re: [update] Python 3.8.7

2021-01-03 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 09:43:39PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > ..so I think I've got everything for 3.8.7 now. > https://junkpile.org/diff.py387 if anyone wants to read it - > 260 files changed, 1371 insertions(+), 1156 deletions(-) > ..so I don't expect a full read-through from anyone ;)

Re: [update] Python 3.8.7

2021-01-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
..so I think I've got everything for 3.8.7 now. https://junkpile.org/diff.py387 if anyone wants to read it - 260 files changed, 1371 insertions(+), 1156 deletions(-) ..so I don't expect a full read-through from anyone ;) I am happy enough that it doesn't generally break the build, and it will b

Re: swig update (was Re: [update] Python 3.8.7)

2021-01-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/01/03 20:17, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/12/30 18:23, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > Thanks for testing Stuart and Kurt. Hopefully this was the only breakage > > from the swig update? If so that's pretty good news. > > cad/opensta fails too. > So opensta just has a tight version number

Re: swig update (was Re: [update] Python 3.8.7)

2021-01-03 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/12/30 18:23, Daniel Dickman wrote: > Thanks for testing Stuart and Kurt. Hopefully this was the only breakage > from the swig update? If so that's pretty good news. cad/opensta fails too.

Re: swig update (was Re: [update] Python 3.8.7)

2020-12-31 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/12/30 18:23, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2020/12/29 23:45, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 07:40:41PM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > > Here's an update for swig that I've been running with for some time. It >

Re: swig update (was Re: [update] Python 3.8.7)

2020-12-30 Thread Daniel Dickman
On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/12/29 23:45, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 07:40:41PM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > Here's an update for swig that I've been running with for some time. It > > > will likely benefit from going through a bulk. > >

Re: swig update (was Re: [update] Python 3.8.7)

2020-12-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/12/29 23:45, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 07:40:41PM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > Here's an update for swig that I've been running with for some time. It > > will likely benefit from going through a bulk. > > I've just kicked off a sparc64 bulk build with this swig

Re: opencv drop py2 (was Re: [update] Python 3.8.7)

2020-12-30 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Wed Dec 30, 2020 at 01:21:54PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > sadly this will break packaging for all python ports with shared > > > > > libraries to the change they made for shared libraries :-( > > > > > > > > 3.9 will have the same in the next release. > > > > > > > > There are ap

opencv drop py2 (was Re: [update] Python 3.8.7)

2020-12-30 Thread Stuart Henderson
> > > > sadly this will break packaging for all python ports with shared > > > > libraries to the change they made for shared libraries :-( > > > > > > 3.9 will have the same in the next release. > > > > > > There are approx 178 ports to fix, they'll just need plist regen and > > > bumping (there

swig update (was Re: [update] Python 3.8.7)

2020-12-29 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 07:40:41PM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > Some (but not all) of these use swig so maybe an update/change there > > might help those (the version of swig that we have isn't supposed > > to support py3.8 anyway). > Here's an update for swig that I've been running with for

Re: [update] Python 3.8.7

2020-12-29 Thread Daniel Dickman
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Some (but not all) of these use swig so maybe an update/change there > might help those (the version of swig that we have isn't supposed > to support py3.8 anyway). > Here's an update for swig that I've been running with for some time. It will

Re: [update] Python 3.8.7

2020-12-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/12/29 20:34, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/12/29 15:36, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2020/12/28 16:39, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 4:12 PM Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > > > > > > > Here's an update for Python 3.8 to 3.8.7 > > > > > > > > https://docs.python.org/r

Re: [update] Python 3.8.7

2020-12-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/12/29 15:36, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/12/28 16:39, Daniel Dickman wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 4:12 PM Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > > > > > Here's an update for Python 3.8 to 3.8.7 > > > > > > https://docs.python.org/release/3.8.7/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-8-7 > > > > >

Re: [update] Python 3.8.7

2020-12-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/12/28 16:39, Daniel Dickman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 4:12 PM Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > > > Here's an update for Python 3.8 to 3.8.7 > > > > https://docs.python.org/release/3.8.7/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-8-7 > > > > As usual, all tests but the asyncio test complete successf

Re: [update] Python 3.8.7

2020-12-28 Thread Daniel Dickman
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 4:12 PM Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > Here's an update for Python 3.8 to 3.8.7 > > https://docs.python.org/release/3.8.7/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-8-7 > > As usual, all tests but the asyncio test complete successfully. (asyncio > never completes). > > (cc maintainer) >

[update] Python 3.8.7

2020-12-28 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
Here's an update for Python 3.8 to 3.8.7 https://docs.python.org/release/3.8.7/whatsnew/changelog.html#python-3-8-7 As usual, all tests but the asyncio test complete successfully. (asyncio never completes). (cc maintainer) --Kurt Index: Makefile