On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 18:57:44 +0100, Pascal Stumpf
wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 11:47:50 -0500, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:52:16 +0100, Pascal Stumpf
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This Prometheus exporter exports metrics for certificates
> > > collected from various sources:
> > >
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 11:47:50 -0500, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:52:16 +0100, Pascal Stumpf
> wrote:
>
> > This Prometheus exporter exports metrics for certificates collected
> > from various sources:
> >
> > * TCP probes
> > * HTTPS probes
> > * PEM files
> > * Remote PEM files
Can we start to somehow annotate these ports where they really don't
care what specific numerical uid is used so that one day, if we get
dynamic UID creation, we can quickly figure out which ports we can
reclaim fixed UIDs from?
On 2025/02/23 11:47, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> uid 564 has been released
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:52:16 +0100, Pascal Stumpf
wrote:
> This Prometheus exporter exports metrics for certificates collected
> from various sources:
>
> * TCP probes
> * HTTPS probes
> * PEM files
> * Remote PEM files
> * Kubernetes secrets
> * Kubeconfig files
>
> The metrics are labelled wi
This Prometheus exporter exports metrics for certificates collected
from various sources:
* TCP probes
* HTTPS probes
* PEM files
* Remote PEM files
* Kubernetes secrets
* Kubeconfig files
The metrics are labelled with fields from the certificate, which
allows for informational dashboards and fle
