Re: [new] net/simplehttpserver

2023-10-11 Thread lux
On Wed, 2023-10-11 at 16:39 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > upstream says, "This project is intended for development purposes only; > it should not be used in production". is it really a good thing to have > in ports? > Hi, because this is not a long-term running web service, it is typically use

Re: [new] net/simplehttpserver

2023-10-11 Thread Chris Petrik
Nope Sent from Proton Mail mobile Original Message On Oct 11, 2023, 10:39 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > upstream says, "This project is intended for development purposes only; it > should not be used in production". is it really a good thing to have in > ports? On 2023/10/11

Re: [new] net/simplehttpserver

2023-10-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
upstream says, "This project is intended for development purposes only; it should not be used in production". is it really a good thing to have in ports? On 2023/10/11 23:34, lux wrote: > On Sun, 2023-10-01 at 17:48 +0800, lux wrote: > > Hi ports@, > > > > simplehttpserver with in addition a ful

Re: [new] net/simplehttpserver

2023-10-11 Thread lux
On Sun, 2023-10-01 at 17:48 +0800, lux wrote: > Hi ports@, > > simplehttpserver with in addition a fully customizable TCP server, > both supporting TLS. > > Github: https://github.com/projectdiscovery/simplehttpserver > > Features: > > - HTTP/S Web Server > > - File Server with arbitrary direc

[new] net/simplehttpserver

2023-10-01 Thread lux
Hi ports@, simplehttpserver with in addition a fully customizable TCP server, both supporting TLS. Github: https://github.com/projectdiscovery/simplehttpserver Features: - HTTP/S Web Server - File Server with arbitrary directory support - HTTP request/response dump - Configurable ip address