Re: [net/igmpproxy] Update to 0.3

2021-01-12 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/01/12 06:04, Joel Knight wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 4:22 AM Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > I don't get multicast from my ISP any more so can't test runtime. > > ports-wise the hardcoded CFLAGS should go and plist regenerated, > > otherwise looks good. I've added DEBUG_PACKAGES while

Re: [net/igmpproxy] Update to 0.3

2021-01-12 Thread Joel Knight
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 4:22 AM Stuart Henderson wrote: > > I don't get multicast from my ISP any more so can't test runtime. > ports-wise the hardcoded CFLAGS should go and plist regenerated, > otherwise looks good. I've added DEBUG_PACKAGES while there. Oops, thanks for catching the plist updat

Re: [net/igmpproxy] Update to 0.3

2021-01-12 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/01/11 21:32, Joel Knight wrote: > Hi. This diff brings net/igmpproxy up to v0.3 which is the latest at > this time. The diff is rather intrusive due to the path to source > files having changed upstream. Upstream also appears to have > integrated random chunks of patches from the current ve

[net/igmpproxy] Update to 0.3

2021-01-11 Thread Joel Knight
Hi. This diff brings net/igmpproxy up to v0.3 which is the latest at this time. The diff is rather intrusive due to the path to source files having changed upstream. Upstream also appears to have integrated random chunks of patches from the current version of the port. I did try to start a dialog