bowser pointed out (thanks!) that I forgot to update MASTER_SITES
when working around the version confusion (10.00.0 and 10.0.0 are used
inconsistently). Fix attached.
On 10/4/22 16:16, Volker Schlecht wrote:
Here's the update to ghostscript 10.0 with the version bump to the
shared lib.Ind
Here's the update to ghostscript 10.0 with the version bump to the
shared lib.Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.124
diff -u -p -r1.124 Makefile
--- Makefile 3 Jul 2022 22:4
Since there's no documented security content, there's probably no harm
in waiting until after 7.2 with that one if the update is deemed too
risky.
It looks to me like a lot of dynamic exports have been removed. I think
we should bump the major shared lib version.
Post 7.2 please
Fair enou
On 2022/09/23 12:06, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Thu Sep 22, 2022 at 08:32:46PM +0200, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > And now also with update-patches ...
> >
> > On 9/22/22 20:26, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > > Here's an update to ghostscript 10.0.0
> > > Unfortunately there seems to be a bit of confus
On Thu Sep 22, 2022 at 08:32:46PM +0200, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> And now also with update-patches ...
>
> On 9/22/22 20:26, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > Here's an update to ghostscript 10.0.0
> > Unfortunately there seems to be a bit of confusion whether the version
> > is 10.0.0 or 10.00.0, so we
And now also with update-patches ...
On 9/22/22 20:26, Volker Schlecht wrote:
Here's an update to ghostscript 10.0.0
Unfortunately there seems to be a bit of confusion whether the version
is 10.0.0 or 10.00.0, so we need some gymnastics to not break PLIST
substitution.
Since there's no docum
Here's an update to ghostscript 10.0.0
Unfortunately there seems to be a bit of confusion whether the version
is 10.0.0 or 10.00.0, so we need some gymnastics to not break PLIST
substitution.
Since there's no documented security content, there's probably no harm
in waiting until after 7.2 wit
