On Apr 12, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Eric Lalonde writes:
>
>> The below diff fixes a bug in the assumptions ntop 1.1 makes about
>> terminal column widths. When ntop is run on terminals with more than 257
>> columns, the printHeader() function will write a NULL byte
On 2015/04/12 20:19, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Eric Lalonde writes:
>
> > The below diff fixes a bug in the assumptions ntop 1.1 makes about
> > terminal column widths. When ntop is run on terminals with more than 257
> > columns, the printHeader() function will write a NULL byte beyond t
Eric Lalonde writes:
> The below diff fixes a bug in the assumptions ntop 1.1 makes about
> terminal column widths. When ntop is run on terminals with more than 257
> columns, the printHeader() function will write a NULL byte beyond the
> end of the progName string. While I was there I converted
The below diff fixes a bug in the assumptions ntop 1.1 makes about terminal
column widths. When ntop is run on terminals with more than 257 columns, the
printHeader() function will write a NULL byte beyond the end of the progName
string. While I was there I converted sprintf() to snprintf(), sin
Another Ok, on this? :)
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 23:38:46 -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 03:26:33PM -0300, Gonzalo L. R. wrote:
Hi,
A little update for ntop.
Comments, Ok?
Looks good. Tested on amd64.
--
Sending from my VCR
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 03:26:33PM -0300, Gonzalo L. R. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A little update for ntop.
>
> Comments, Ok?
Looks good. Tested on amd64.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Hi,
A little update for ntop.
Comments, Ok?
Cheers.
--
Sending from my VCR
ntop-1.1p1.diff
Description: Binary data