Hi,
Attached is the diff to upgrade devel/nant to version 0.92. It's been
tested on i386 and amd64 through regression tests and building
lang/boo (with the patch that I just sent to ports@). By the way, big
thanks to the folks who got NAnt working on amd64. Please let me know
if there any quest
On 2011/11/12 07:08, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> > On 2011-11-07, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> >>> On 2011/11/07 07:08, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> Thanks Stuart. One of the things that I added to this update was
> regression testing so I h
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-11-07, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>>> On 2011/11/07 07:08, Ryan Boggs wrote:
Thanks Stuart. One of the things that I added to this update was
regression testing so I hope that helps with your review.
>
> regression tests an
On 2011-11-07, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>> On 2011/11/07 07:08, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>>> Thanks Stuart. One of the things that I added to this update was
>>> regression testing so I hope that helps with your review.
regression tests and "make clean" fail unless nant is already installed
when it was built:
Hi,
On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:55 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/11/07 07:08, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>> Thanks Stuart. One of the things that I added to this update was
>> regression testing so I hope that helps with your review.
>
> ah, thanks, I missed that in the description (I usually read
> p
On 2011/11/07 07:08, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> Thanks Stuart. One of the things that I added to this update was
> regression testing so I hope that helps with your review.
ah, thanks, I missed that in the description (I usually read
ports@ in a newsreader which doesn't do MIME so didn't bother
looking
Hi,
On Nov 7, 2011, at 1:45 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-11-07, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>>> Anyone? ?Please let me know if changes are needed.
>> Has anyone had a chance to review this yet? Please let me know if
>> there are any questions.
>
> I'll take a look next week if nobody beats me
On 2011-11-07, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>> Anyone? ?Please let me know if changes are needed.
> Has anyone had a chance to review this yet? Please let me know if
> there are any questions.
I'll take a look next week if nobody beats me to it, but between
the breakage on amd64 and the lack of regression
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The attached diff brings NAnt up to version 0.91 which was just
>>> released. Was tested on i386 u
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Ryan Boggs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached diff brings NAnt up to version 0.91 which was just
> released. Was tested on i386 using regress and by building lang/boo.
>
> Please note other changes:
> * All patches from 0.90 have been applied upstream. Diff (tri
Hi,
The attached patch updates nant to 0.90 (released yesterday). I also
made modifications to install the included documentation to the
appropriate area. Tested on i386. Please let me know if there are
any questions.
Would anyone mind if I take ownership of this port? I'm now directly
involv
11 matches
Mail list logo
