Re: [RFC] Split sysutils/u-boot

2023-08-08 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 16:20:09 -0400 > From: A Tammy > > On 8/8/23 15:38, Mark Kettenis wrote: > >> From: Stuart Henderson > >> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 22:59:21 +0100 > >> > >> Just had a quick read through on my phone, I'll try to have another look > >> tomorrow, generally looks good. > >> >

Re: [RFC] Split sysutils/u-boot

2023-08-08 Thread A Tammy
On 8/8/23 15:38, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Stuart Henderson >> Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 22:59:21 +0100 >> >> Just had a quick read through on my phone, I'll try to have another look >> tomorrow, generally looks good. >> >> For each of the new PLIST files you need to add "@pkgpath >> sysutils/

Re: [RFC] Split sysutils/u-boot

2023-08-08 Thread Mark Kettenis
> From: Stuart Henderson > Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 22:59:21 +0100 > > Just had a quick read through on my phone, I'll try to have another look > tomorrow, generally looks good. > > For each of the new PLIST files you need to add "@pkgpath > sysutils/u-boot,old_flavour_name" alongside any existin

Re: [RFC] Split sysutils/u-boot

2023-08-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
Just had a quick read through on my phone, I'll try to have another look tomorrow, generally looks good. For each of the new PLIST files you need to add "@pkgpath sysutils/u-boot,old_flavour_name" alongside any existing @pkgpath so that pkg_add -u accepts it as an update despite the different

[RFC] Split sysutils/u-boot

2023-08-07 Thread Mark Kettenis
This splits sysutils/u-boot into three different ports instead of using flavours. The motivation behind this is that the current port is very hard to update without breaking shit. By turning this into separate ports we can update them individually. My idea is that we split this up by SoC family/