On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Miod Vallat wrote:
>> > I need to gather some history about the use of BEL as an end-of-escape
>> > (what a silly idea), but I fart in^W^Wagree with the direction this diff
>> > is going in so far.
>> >
>>
>> I think it got invented by xterm. suntool's shelltool use
> > I need to gather some history about the use of BEL as an end-of-escape
> > (what a silly idea), but I fart in^W^Wagree with the direction this diff
> > is going in so far.
> >
>
> I think it got invented by xterm. suntool's shelltool used BS to
> terminate the title. See
> http://invisible-is
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 06:26:31PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > when i get time
> >
> > i think we might want to do the same in the STRING_ESCAPE state too, and
> > it will need miod's ok
>
> I need to gather some history about the use of BEL as an end-of-escape
> (what a silly idea), but I fart
> when i get time
>
> i think we might want to do the same in the STRING_ESCAPE state too, and
> it will need miod's ok
I need to gather some history about the use of BEL as an end-of-escape
(what a silly idea), but I fart in^W^Wagree with the direction this diff
is going in so far.
when i get time
i think we might want to do the same in the STRING_ESCAPE state too, and
it will need miod's ok
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:41:55AM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> What about this?
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:05 PM, David Coppa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at
Hi Nicholas,
What about this?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:05 PM, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Nicholas Marriott
> wrote:
>> Yes it is trying to set the window title (three times in fact for some
>> reason):
>>
>> ^[]0;Paolo Fresu & Uri Caine - Darn That Dream^G
>>
>> IIR
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> Yes it is trying to set the window title (three times in fact for some
> reason):
>
> ^[]0;Paolo Fresu & Uri Caine - Darn That Dream^G
>
> IIRC this will make wscons freeze. This is because it expects OSC to be
> terminated by ST (\033\)
Well, I don't know about that, tigetflag is in libncurses and if you've
called setupterm or whatever it should work just fine. But if you like.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:19:33PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Nicholas Marriott
> wrote:
> > If it uses ncurses then
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> If it uses ncurses then yes it does use terminfo.
yes, i meant it doesn't already use terminfo's routines directly, thus
the patch would become a little too intrusive...
If it uses ncurses then yes it does use terminfo.
But sure, disable window title is easiest.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:08:37PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
>
> > Yes this is what tmux used to do, but you are forgetting konsole,
> > gnome-terminal, E
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Yes this is what tmux used to do, but you are forgetting konsole,
> gnome-terminal, Eterm and many others.
>
> I would check for the XT flag in terminfo in preference. Our terminfo is
> new enough that it is present.
>
> If setupterm() or similar h
Yes this is what tmux used to do, but you are forgetting konsole,
gnome-terminal, Eterm and many others.
I would check for the XT flag in terminfo in preference. Our terminfo is
new enough that it is present.
If setupterm() or similar has already been called by this point you can
try tigetflag("X
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Well, this will stop it setting the title in xterm.
>
> I guess it is right and the intent here is to STOP it setting the title
> in the Linux console, even if the user turns it on.
Unfortunately I cannot test your patch until I'll be back home thi
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Nicholas Marriott
wrote:
> Well, this will stop it setting the title in xterm.
>
> I guess it is right and the intent here is to STOP it setting the title
> in the Linux console, even if the user turns it on.
Ah... You're right.
I'll try your patch then :)
Well, this will stop it setting the title in xterm.
I guess it is right and the intent here is to STOP it setting the title
in the Linux console, even if the user turns it on.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:46:48AM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
>
> > Yes
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Yes it is trying to set the window title (three times in fact for some
> reason):
>
> ^[]0;Paolo Fresu & Uri Caine - Darn That Dream^G
>
> IIRC this will make wscons freeze. This is because it expects OSC to be
> terminated by ST (\033\) not by ^G
Yep yours is doing it too similar to what's in my mail to dcoppa except
it sets an empty title:
^[]0;^G
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:56:22PM -0700, Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2011-07-26 01:29:34, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> > Run ncmppc in script(1) and see what it is sending with TERM=wsvt25.
> >
Yes it is trying to set the window title (three times in fact for some reason):
^[]0;Paolo Fresu & Uri Caine - Darn That Dream^G
IIRC this will make wscons freeze. This is because it expects OSC to be
terminated by ST (\033\) not by ^G (\007). So it sits waiting for the
end that will never arrive
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2011-07-26 01:29:34, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
>> Run ncmppc in script(1) and see what it is sending with TERM=wsvt25.
>>
>> Probably it is bypassing terminfo or doing something silly like trying
>> to set the xterm window title which tends
On 2011-07-26 01:29:34, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> Run ncmppc in script(1) and see what it is sending with TERM=wsvt25.
>
> Probably it is bypassing terminfo or doing something silly like trying
> to set the xterm window title which tends to make wscons unhappy.
>
Script attached.
--
Bryan
The bs key thing is probably something like it assumes backspace will be
^H but on OpenBSD it is \177. Dunno why it works for dcoppa unless he is
using a terminal which sends something else for backspace.
Delete is typically \033[3~ but I would guess it just gets that from
ncurses and pretends it
Run ncmppc in script(1) and see what it is sending with TERM=wsvt25.
Probably it is bypassing terminfo or doing something silly like trying
to set the xterm window title which tends to make wscons unhappy.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:19:31PM -0700, Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2011-07-25 10:49:47, Da
On 2011-07-25 10:49:47, David Coppa wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Bryan Linton wrote:
>> On 2011-07-24 18:38:55, David Coppa wrote:
>>> No one wants to comment/ok this?
>>>
>>
>> (Mostly) works for me on i386. The tag editor/search page doesn't
>> respond to a backspace key at all.
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Benoit Lecocq wrote:
> quickly test on amd64, works for me ! ok benoit@
>
> On 07/24/11 18:38, David Coppa wrote:
>>
>> No one wants to comment/ok this?
I will import it later this evening, if nobody objects.
cheers!
David
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2011-07-24 18:38:55, David Coppa wrote:
>> No one wants to comment/ok this?
>>
>
> (Mostly) works for me on i386. The tag editor/search page doesn't
> respond to a backspace key at all. Delete functions as a
> backspace key instead (del
On 2011-07-24 18:38:55, David Coppa wrote:
> No one wants to comment/ok this?
>
(Mostly) works for me on i386. The tag editor/search page doesn't
respond to a backspace key at all. Delete functions as a
backspace key instead (deleting to the left of the cursor).
I checked audio/ncmpc and it t
No one wants to comment/ok this?
ciao,
david
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:20 PM, David Coppa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a port of ncmpcpp, a clone of ncmpc with enhanced features.
>
> cheers!
> David
>
> $ pkg_info ncmpcpp
> Information for inst:ncmpcpp-0.5.7
>
> Comment:
> ncurses mpd client inspire
Hi,
This is a port of ncmpcpp, a clone of ncmpc with enhanced features.
cheers!
David
$ pkg_info ncmpcpp
Information for inst:ncmpcpp-0.5.7
Comment:
ncurses mpd client inspired by ncmpc
Description:
Ncmpcpp or ncmpc++ is a mpd client with a UI very similar to ncmpc, but
it provides new useful
28 matches
Mail list logo
