Thanks for picking this port up again.
On 2024-04-18 00:30, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I've rearranged things slightly (in particular used upstream's
> icingadb-web name). I think I'm pretty happy with this, though I'd
> kind of like to take maintainer myself to keep all the icinga ports
> under s
On 2024/04/11 23:04, Alvar Penning wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> For the record, I have been running the two ports without any problems
> since my last mail.
>
> Today both Icinga DB and Icinga DB Web have been updated and I have
> updated my ports as well. Please feel free to check out the attached
> u
Hi again,
For the record, I have been running the two ports without any problems
since my last mail.
Today both Icinga DB and Icinga DB Web have been updated and I have
updated my ports as well. Please feel free to check out the attached
updated ports.
- https://github.com/Icinga/icingadb/releas
Thank you very much for the fast and, even with the ongoing release
situation, comprehensive answer.
On 2024-03-10 14:36, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> There's the same text in net/icinga/web2-module-icingadb/pkg/DESCR as
> net/icinga/icingadb/pkg/DESCR. Better to describe what the module in
> partic
Hi all,
I recently started porting Icinga DB[0] and the corresponding Icinga DB
Web[1], a module for Icinga Web 2. In a current Icinga 2 setup, Icinga
DB aims at replacing the Icinga Data Output, IDO, which was deprecated.
The attached tarball contains a diff against existing files and the two
ne
I'll have another look after we're done with release but some quick
comments for now (I haven't tried running it yet but am interested)
| Before starting Icinga DB, the included sample configuration must be
| copied to /etc/icingadb/config.yml and altered accordingly:
|
| # mkdir /etc/icingadb
|
