On Wed, 1 May 2019 20:49:52 -0700
Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> Bump
>
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 05:49:58PM -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> > I'm the MAINTAINER on this one, but could use another set of eyes.
> > This normally comes with a "package-stash-conflicts" binary that is
> > pretty use
Bump
On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 05:49:58PM -0700, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> I'm the MAINTAINER on this one, but could use another set of eyes. This
> normally comes with a "package-stash-conflicts" binary that is pretty
> useless, so I thought I would avoid installing that, which means we
> don't
I'm the MAINTAINER on this one, but could use another set of eyes. This
normally comes with a "package-stash-conflicts" binary that is pretty
useless, so I thought I would avoid installing that, which means we
don't need Package::Stash::Conflicts and don't need Dist::CheckConflicts
as a RUN_DEPEND
