Re: Emacs 25.3p0-gtk3 pkg missing dependencies (amd64)

2018-07-08 Thread John Long
On Sun, 2018-07-08 at 18:49 +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Hi John, emacs port maintainer here, > > On Sun, Jul 08 2018, John Long wrote: > > emacs-25.3p0-gtk3 GNU editor: extensible, customizable, self- > > documenting > > Gtk-Message: Failed to load

Emacs 25.3p0-gtk3 pkg missing dependencies (amd64)

2018-07-08 Thread John Long
emacs-25.3p0-gtk3 GNU editor: extensible, customizable, self-documenting Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module" Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module" Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module" I found libcanberra-gtk3 in pkgs and that fixed the first messa

Re: Which port produces this build output?

2018-05-05 Thread John Long
On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 12:49 -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: > On 05/04/18 12:46, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2018/05/04 11:09, Brian Callahan wrote: > > > On 05/04/18 06:45, Solene Rapenne wrote: > > > > Christian Weisgerber writes: > > > > > > > > > I see this splashed on my dpb window. Apparent

Re: claws-mail: stop using encrypt()

2014-12-18 Thread John Long
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 02:09:24PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2014/12/18 13:40, John Long wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:30:23PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2014/12/18 12:38, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > > On 2014-

Re: claws-mail: stop using encrypt()

2014-12-18 Thread John Long
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:30:23PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2014/12/18 12:38, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > On 2014-12-17, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > claws-mail uses encrypt() for password obfuscation in the saved config > > > file (.claws-mail/accountrc), which was removed fr

Re: the mutt of rss readers

2013-10-15 Thread John Long
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:46:50PM -0400, Kenta Suzumoto wrote: > Hi all. In my transition to OpenBSD I've been looking for an RSS reader. snownews is pretty nice and it has been in ports for a long time.

Has anyone built g95 lately?

2013-04-04 Thread John Long
The g95 project is alive again. This is a Fortran 95 compiler with some nice extensions that uses an oldish gcc back end. It is not gfortran. Has anyone built this and could you share your package for amd64? It would be great having this on mips64el too since gfortran is not available in ports/pack

Re: new: lang/fpc

2013-03-02 Thread John Long
This is great news. Thank you. On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 07:03:31PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > Time to submit a compiler for my eponymous language. > > Free Pascal (aka FPK Pascal) is a 32 and 64 bit professional Pascal > compiler. It is available for different processors: Intel x86, > Amd64/x86

Re: QEMU broken on 5.2-stable mips64el (Loongson)

2013-02-08 Thread John Long
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:03:23AM -0500, Brian Callahan wrote: > Has this ever worked for you? No, this is the first time I tried to build it on this box. > AFAIK, mips64 as a host has been broken for a few years now... I wasn't aware of it. I checked the makefile before trying to build the po

QEMU broken on 5.2-stable mips64el (Loongson)

2013-02-08 Thread John Long
In file included from /usr/ports/pobj/qemu-1.1.0/qemu-1.1.0/target-i386/translate.c:28: /usr/ports/pobj/qemu-1.1.0/qemu-1.1.0/tcg/tcg-op.h: In function 'tcg_gen_div_i64': /usr/ports/pobj/qemu-1.1.0/qemu-1.1.0/tcg/tcg-op.h:1229: error: 'TCG_TARGET_HAS_div_i64' undeclared (first use in this functi

Re: Cranking the optimiser on selected ports?

2012-12-20 Thread John Long
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 07:32:44PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:20:50PM +0000, John Long wrote: > > > > What about a FLAVOR on specific ports where somebody happens to know it > > helps? > > > > /jl > > It's still very likely

Re: Cranking the optimiser on selected ports?

2012-12-20 Thread John Long
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 05:46:33PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > Edd Barrett wrote: > > > > > Subject: Cranking the optimiser on selected ports? > > > > No. > > > > > Now, I know we don't usually like to turn the optimiser u

Re: FIX: texlive_base on big endian

2012-12-20 Thread John Long
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 05:00:42PM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > We are talking about personally owned machines here. I have a blade 1K > which is in a remote location and has fallen over somehow. I dont know what > marcus has. > > The project has (fast?) sparc64 machines for bulk builds, b

Re: FIX: texlive_base on big endian

2012-12-20 Thread John Long
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:21:15PM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > Looks like the big endian fix for texlive base got lost somewhere along > the line. My sparc64 has fallen over, so I can't test this, but I > believe this is the fix. Markus Lude is currently running a build but he > tells me

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread John Long
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 02:01:21PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Sorry I've not got time for a detailed answer to the whole mail right now, > but updating one port to -current without also updating dependencies > is often going to fail (especially for things like this which have > many dep's).

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread John Long
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 07:39:38AM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > How much space should I allocate to /usr/ports to be able to build anything > > in the tree at this point? Looking at the man page for ports and bsd.port.mk > > I am not sure whether moving the work directory elsewhere (I have plent

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread John Long
Thanks for the explanations Stuart. I didn't look into the problem too much before trying to build the port because I figured it might be a problem with the package. After your reply I realize this is a tough situation. > > Is libreoffice known to be broken on AMD64 5.2-stable? > > I don't have a

How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread John Long
I did a pkg_add for Libreoffice on 5.2 stable and when I run libreoffice I get errors about a size mismatch in libstdc++ and the screen is not painted properly. I tried to build the port but I don't have enough space allocated. Is libreoffice known to be broken on AMD64 5.2-stable? How much space

Re: lang/gcc - gnat for amd64 and sparc64

2012-11-05 Thread John Long
This is great news. I haven't seen Pascal post since we last discussed this. I have a Loongson machine available in case you or he or anybody else needs it to get Ada or gcc 4.7.2 going on that platform. Please contact me offline if interested. Sorry I can't help test this, I don't have OpenBSD r

Re: [PATCH] Make graphics/ffmpeg compile on loongson

2012-10-27 Thread John Long
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:10:31PM +0200, Donovan Watteau wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 01:45:43PM +0200, Donovan Watteau wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The following diff makes it possible for ffmpeg to be linked > > on loongson (it used to give "ld: final link failed: Bad value", > > see [1]), and

Re: Emacs 24.2

2012-10-25 Thread John Long
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:06:04PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2012/10/25 11:03, J?r?mie Courr?ges-Anglas wrote: > > > > Hi porters, > > > > > > > > what about getting this in? > > > > > > ping > > > > > > I can take over

ping Donovan did your ffmpeg patch for Loongson get applied?

2012-10-19 Thread John Long
Donovan, I seem to remember you posted a patch to fix ffmpeg on Loongson awhile ago. Do you know if it got applied to -current source? Running the Oct 8 snapshot and a ports tree updated in the last day or two, ffmpeg-20120610p1 doesn't build. Thanks, /jl ===> Building for ffmpeg-20120610p1 cc

Re: lang/gcc: add Ada support on amd64 [Loongson box available]

2012-10-09 Thread John Long
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:55:09PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:31:08 +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:38:49PM +0000, John Long wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:33:12AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > > > > On Wed, Se

Re: lang/gcc: add Ada support on amd64

2012-09-28 Thread John Long
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:55:09PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:31:08 +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:38:49PM +0000, John Long wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:33:12AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > > > > On Wed, Se

Re: lang/gcc: add Ada support on amd64

2012-09-28 Thread John Long
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:31:08PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:38:49PM +0000, John Long wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:33:12AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 07:42:07PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > > > > Add a

Re: lang/gcc: add Ada support on amd64

2012-09-27 Thread John Long
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:33:12AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 07:42:07PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > > Add amd64 support to gnat 4.2 - 4.7. snipped > Question: would you have the patience to start doing that on other targets > ? It would be nice if ada were supported on o

Re: [PATCH] lang/g77 broken

2012-09-23 Thread John Long
Thanks alot Nigel! I'll study what you did here. /jl On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 03:29:13PM +0100, Nigel Taylor wrote: > On 09/20/12 15:17, John Long wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:57:42AM +0100, Nigel Taylor wrote: > >> On 09/19/12 20:15, Stuart Henderson wrote: &g

Re: [PATCH] lang/g77 broken

2012-09-20 Thread John Long
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:15:46PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/09/19 12:17, John Long wrote: > > lang/g77 is missing the dependency on libf2c. When built as is g77 fails > > because of the missing library. This patches fixes that. > > > > OK? > > &

Re: [PATCH] lang/g77 broken

2012-09-20 Thread John Long
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:57:42AM +0100, Nigel Taylor wrote: > On 09/19/12 20:15, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2012/09/19 12:17, John Long wrote: > >> lang/g77 is missing the dependency on libf2c. When built as is g77 fails > >> because of the missing libra

[PATCH] lang/g77 broken

2012-09-19 Thread John Long
lang/g77 is missing the dependency on libf2c. When built as is g77 fails because of the missing library. This patches fixes that. OK? Index: ports/lang/g77/Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/g77/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.1

lang/g77 broken

2012-09-11 Thread John Long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 lang/g77 is missing the dependency on the libf2c library. I sent this to ports-bugs@ but couldn't find the mailing list archive anywhere so in case that mailing list is dead here it is again. Index: ports/lang/g77/Makefile =

lang/gfortran broken in -current?

2012-08-27 Thread John Long
I was trying to build lang/gfortran in -current on loongson (mips64el). OpenBSD 5.2-beta (GENERIC) #147: Thu Jun 28 10:03:22 MDT 2012 t...@loongson.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/loongson/compile/GENERIC Is this port known to be broken? This is an excerpt from the build: /usr/ports/pobj/gfor