devel/swig supports ruby but DESCR doesn't say so

2006-08-18 Thread Andrew Smith
It's not really worth sending as a patch but I thought I should mention that the devel/swig package description doesn't list ruby as a supported scripting language and it does indeed work reasonably well these days. -Andy

Re: Twisted

2006-03-31 Thread Andrew Smith
Thanks Eric, Tell me, have you found twisted a worthwhile effort? -Andy -Original Message- From: Eric Faurot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 March 2006 19:47 To: Andrew Smith Cc: ports@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Twisted On 3/31/06, Andrew Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (for

Is Ethereal coming to ports or was it booted?

2006-02-11 Thread Andrew Smith
Hi, I notice there's an empty net/ethereal directory structure in the ports tree at the moment. Has Ethereal been in ports and been kicked out or did someone put that there speculatively? The only 'visualisation' tool that seems to be present is netdude which I haven't run before but look

Python versions and dependencies

2006-02-08 Thread Andrew Smith
It seems that a reasonable number of ports are Python dependent upon 2.3 and will start to build 2.3 as a dependency even if 2.4 is available. particularly py-Numeric and py-gtk2 is this still intentional or an oversight? I notice that ports like Zope are dependent upon 2.4 so I presume if this

Re: Gnumeric 1.4.3p0

2006-01-29 Thread Andrew Smith
29 January 2006 15:52 To: Andrew Smith Cc: ports@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Gnumeric 1.4.3p0 On Sunday 29 January 2006 10:09, Andrew Smith wrote: > No this sounds like there is something wrong.. even on my Zaurus I get full > Gnumeric and a full toolbar. > > How did you install it

Re: Gnumeric 1.4.3p0

2006-01-29 Thread Andrew Smith
No this sounds like there is something wrong.. even on my Zaurus I get full Gnumeric and a full toolbar. How did you install it? Did you download the tarball and run pkg_add locally or did you install it passing a URL to a package feed location? Did you have to specify other flags to get it insta

Re: xffm issues rm -rfv on empty trash

2006-01-28 Thread Andrew Smith
Forgot to mention, offending line is line 147 of modules/trash.c -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Smith Sent: 29 January 2006 01:02 To: ports@openbsd.org Subject: xffm issues rm -rfv on empty trash As xffm seems to show ports

xffm issues rm -rfv on empty trash

2006-01-28 Thread Andrew Smith
As xffm seems to show ports@openbsd.org as the maintainer of xfce4 I will report this here. Xffm (the XFCE4 File Manager) issues rm -rfv when you try to empty the trashcan. As the -v option is a Linux-ism for verbose deletion (prints all file names as they are deleted) the rm command fails. I ca