On 9/27/24 11:05 AM, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:43:21 +0200,
Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
https://www.evilsocket.net/2024/09/26/Attacking-UNIX-systems-via-CUPS-Part-I/
Is the cups in ports vulnerable as well?
OpenBSD mises quite import pices of this attack: cups-browsed
With
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:19:47 +0200,
Ian Darwin wrote:
>
> On 9/27/24 11:05 AM, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:43:21 +0200,
> > Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
> >> https://www.evilsocket.net/2024/09/26/Attacking-UNIX-systems-via-CUPS-Part-I/
> >>
> >> Is the cups in ports vulnerab
Bulk build on riscv64-1.ports.openbsd.org
Started : Mon Sep 16 13:09:52 MDT 2024
Finished: Fri Sep 27 08:58:03 MDT 2024
Duration: 10 Days 19 hours 48 minutes
Built using OpenBSD 7.6-beta (GENERIC.MP) #70: Sun Sep 15 16:54:55 MDT 2024
Built 10460 packages
Number of packages built each day:
Sep 1
On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 14:43:21 +0200,
Chris Narkiewicz wrote:
>
> https://www.evilsocket.net/2024/09/26/Attacking-UNIX-systems-via-CUPS-Part-I/
>
> Is the cups in ports vulnerable as well?
OpenBSD mises quite import pices of this attack: cups-browsed
Without it, it isn't so dramatic.
--
wbr, K
https://www.evilsocket.net/2024/09/26/Attacking-UNIX-systems-via-CUPS-Part-I/
Is the cups in ports vulnerable as well?
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 04:28:25AM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Marc Espie writes:
> > Here's the basic pkg_add change, very lightly tested for now.
> > Not that many lines, considering :)
>
> The manpage changes make sense to me.
>
> Typo:
>
> > + my $o = $class->new_owned_objet($args);
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:16:51AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024/08/15 18:33, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Enter @extraglob
> >
> >
> > basically: stuff like @extraglob /var/tomcat/conf/
> > will remove the tomcat dir with everything inside it
> >
> > or stuff like
> > @extra
