Remove telegram-purple

2024-09-20 Thread Lucas de Sena
Telegram-purple, as well as every libtgl-based application, does not work anymore (i tested). Port's page[1] says it is abandoned since 2021 and may or may not work (it did for some time, but now does not). It points to a new project for a libpurple plugin based on the last newest Telegram API: t

Re: VLC; 7.6-beta AMD64 Sept. 17th

2024-09-20 Thread Byron Campbell - WA4GEG
On 2024/09/18 13:33, Byron Campbell - WA4GEG wrote: Turns out that VLC had "hardware acceleration" set to automatic. I assume that it is shipped that way, since I generally have no need to alter the default settings. And the problem is indeed due to the VA-API stuff as Stuart suspected. I got i

Re: VLC; 7.6-beta AMD64 Sept. 17th

2024-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/09/18 09:38, Byron Campbell - WA4GEG wrote: > > Okay, launched VLC from terminal. Here's the output when attempting to play > an MP4, and audio plays but not the video portion: > > $ vlc > VLC media player 3.0.20 Vetinari (revision 3.0.20-0-g6f0d0ab126b) > [0d0660d53220] main libvlc:

Re: x11/tk/8.6: Missing headers in package?

2024-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/09/20 14:10, Stuart Cassoff wrote: > With Tcl, it's always been possible to do that; Tcl is not Python or whatever. > This sort of backwards compatibility exists with/is a feature of Tcl. except togl is seemingly touching Tk internals rather than public interfaces so that is perhaps not re

Re: x11/tk/8.6: Missing headers in package?

2024-09-20 Thread Stuart Cassoff
With Tcl, it's always been possible to do that; Tcl is not Python or whatever.This sort of backwards compatibility exists with/is a feature of Tcl.Extensions built against 8.5 should be able to be loaded into 8.6 without problem.Certainly worth trying, imo. Stu On Friday, September 20, 202

Re: x11/tk/8.6: Missing headers in package?

2024-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/09/20 12:43, Stuart Cassoff wrote: > Private files aren't meant to be installed. They're in the 8.5 package mostly > for historical > reasons or older ports. > Instead of using MODULES you could try setting BUILD_DEPENDS for 8.5 and > WANTLIB and > RUN_DEPENDS for 8.6. > Something like th

Re: x11/tk/8.6: Missing headers in package?

2024-09-20 Thread Stuart Cassoff
Private files aren't meant to be installed. They're in the 8.5 package mostly for historical reasons or older ports.Instead of using MODULES you could try setting BUILD_DEPENDS for 8.5 and WANTLIB and RUN_DEPENDS for 8.6.Something like that, maybe other vars as well. Stu On Friday, Septembe

Re: x11/tk/8.6: Missing headers in package?

2024-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/09/19 17:12, Stuart Cassoff wrote: > Depending on the software it may be possible to build against 8.5 and load > into/run with 8.6. Is there a difference between 8.5 and 8.6 regarding whether it's ok to include private headers in the package?