Stuart has asked if we can get rid of kaccounts-integration (kf5).
I had left it in so as not to lose support in kf5/purpose. However,
purpose is only used by kdevleop. I think that's fine.
Here is a diff that tries to clear up the nonsense with kf5 and kf6
kaccounts-integration.
- Remove kaccou
Fabien ROMANO writes:
> This port is using a release, not a commit id, which is a fixed tarballs from
> github, this is perfectly fine ?
GitHub tarballs generated from tags have the same stability problems as
GitHub tarballs generated from commit IDs.
It's impractical to avoid them completely (b
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2024/05/29 20:11, Fabien ROMANO wrote:
> > By curiosity, lang/lua (5.1.5) doesn't USE_NOBTCFI, there is no JIT ?
> > Why its required for minetest (lua 5.1.4), some patches they bring ?
>
> This diff changes minetest from using lua (no jit, works on most
> archs) to lu
On 30/05/2024 00:04, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024/05/29 20:11, Fabien ROMANO wrote:
>> By curiosity, lang/lua (5.1.5) doesn't USE_NOBTCFI, there is no JIT ?
>> Why its required for minetest (lua 5.1.4), some patches they bring ?
>
> This diff changes minetest from using lua (no jit, works on
On 2024/05/29 20:11, Fabien ROMANO wrote:
> By curiosity, lang/lua (5.1.5) doesn't USE_NOBTCFI, there is no JIT ?
> Why its required for minetest (lua 5.1.4), some patches they bring ?
This diff changes minetest from using lua (no jit, works on most
archs) to luajit (restricted archs and doesn't d
ok sthen@ if someone would like to import
On 2024/05/29 20:46, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2024 19:09:32 +0100,
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > On 2024/05/29 14:42, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > This is small port which brings python library which imple
On Wed, 29 May 2024 19:09:32 +0100,
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2024/05/29 14:42, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > This is small port which brings python library which implements DKIM and ARC
> > verify and sign, and the most important cli tools which can be used against
> > e
Patches are missing, cvs add ?
By curiosity, lang/lua (5.1.5) doesn't USE_NOBTCFI, there is no JIT ?
Why its required for minetest (lua 5.1.4), some patches they bring ?
DIST_TUPLE are pretty cool.
On 29/05/2024 19:23, izder456 wrote:
> On 2024-05-29 06:39, Solene Rapenne wrote:
>> On Mon, May 2
On 2024/05/29 21:55, Kirill Bychkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 14:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I intend to drop php/7.4 and php/8.0 soon (both are out of security
> > support). The following ports/subpackages are setup to use 7.4 at the
> > moment, if anyone's interested in them could you tak
On Wed, May 22, 2024 14:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I intend to drop php/7.4 and php/8.0 soon (both are out of security
> support). The following ports/subpackages are setup to use 7.4 at the
> moment, if anyone's interested in them could you take a look at updating
> or patching to support 8.1+
On 2024-05-29 06:39, Solene Rapenne wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:50:28PM GMT, izder456 wrote:
On Sun, 26 May 2024 19:55:12 -0500
izder456 wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 03:52:48 -0600
> "Anthony J. Bentley" wrote:
> > Here's an updated diff, which I'll commit in a few days unless
> > someo
On 2024/05/29 14:42, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This is small port which brings python library which implements DKIM and ARC
> verify and sign, and the most important cli tools which can be used against
> email to check its DKIM and ARC signatures.
>
> PYPI project: https://pypi.o
This updates to the latest version of Ruby 3.1. Two of our patches
and one distpatch have been upstreamed.
Tested on amd64. Will be committing in a couple days unless I hear
objections.
Thanks,
Jeremy
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file:
On Wed, May 29 2024, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Alternatively, you could keep GH_* and just use DIST_TUPLE for the
> timescaledb-extras distfile, then portroach should still be able to
> detect updates (which it doesn't with DIST_TUPLE).
>
I didn't know it's possible to mix GH_* and DIST_TUPLE.
Le Wed, May 29, 2024 at 03:41:52PM +0200, Solene Rapenne a écrit :
> new update for yt-dlp, nothing fancy
>
> works fine with pipe-viewer on amd64
>
OK denis@
> https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/releases/tag/2024.05.27
>
> diff --git a/www/yt-dlp/Makefile b/www/yt-dlp/Makefile
> index 5ae906b8c
Greetings,
This is small port which brings python library which implements DKIM and ARC
verify and sign, and the most important cli tools which can be used against
email to check its DKIM and ARC signatures.
PYPI project: https://pypi.org/project/dkimpy/
Home page: https://launchpad.net/dkimpy
-
new update for yt-dlp, nothing fancy
works fine with pipe-viewer on amd64
https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/releases/tag/2024.05.27
diff --git a/www/yt-dlp/Makefile b/www/yt-dlp/Makefile
index 5ae906b8c44..17300b8fccb 100644
--- a/www/yt-dlp/Makefile
+++ b/www/yt-dlp/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
COM
On 2024/05/28 21:30, Renato Aguiar wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 28 2024, Denis Fondras wrote:
>
> > Le Mon, May 27, 2024 at 06:55:26PM -0700, Renato Aguiar a écrit :
> >
> > I would add it to the port and print a message at the end of the
> > installation.
> >
>
> Here is a new diff adding the sql sc
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 05:50:28PM GMT, izder456 wrote:
> On Sun, 26 May 2024 19:55:12 -0500
> izder456 wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 03:52:48 -0600
> > "Anthony J. Bentley" wrote:
> > > Here's an updated diff, which I'll commit in a few days unless
> > > someone objects.
> >
> > Thanks fo
On 2024/05/22 12:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I intend to drop php/7.4 and php/8.0 soon (both are out of security
> support). The following ports/subpackages are setup to use 7.4 at the
> moment, if anyone's interested in them could you take a look at updating
> or patching to support 8.1+ please?
On 2024/05/22 12:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I intend to drop php/7.4 and php/8.0 soon (both are out of security
> support). The following ports/subpackages are setup to use 7.4 at the
> moment, if anyone's interested in them could you take a look at updating
> or patching to support 8.1+ please?
On Wed, 29 May 2024 09:14:43 +0100,
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Reattached to make it easier for anyone who wants to look.
>
> I'm not familiar enough with m4 to know if the changes in
> patch-configure make sense.
>
To make it easy for review I made diff between 2.71 and 2.72.
It seems trivi
> > While running 'make fake' i saw the following line, but it seems
> > harmless:
> > ./get_svn_revision.sh[8]: git: not found
>
> Do the package contents change if git is installed?
>
> make package
> make clean=fake
> doas pkg_add git
> make repackage
No, PLIST is not changed.
After looking
On Tue, 28 May 2024 22:11:36 +0100,
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2024/05/28 21:42, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > Tested on -current/amd64 with YubiKey 5C Nano. Everything works which
> > includes ykman oath.
>
> Everything except HID I presume (there's still no HID backend for
> OpenBSD).
>
Reattached to make it easier for anyone who wants to look.
I'm not familiar enough with m4 to know if the changes in
patch-configure make sense.
On 2024/05/29 01:02, Brad Smith wrote:
> ping.
>
> On 2024-05-03 3:53 p.m., Brad Smith wrote:
> > ping.
> >
> > On 2024-04-26 10:14 p.m., Brad Smith w
25 matches
Mail list logo
