After looking at tinyproxy a bit more I noticed a few issues.
It was passing a warning flag to Clang that was not valid and it was
complaining about it all though the build.
So I fixed the autoconf test so it properly detects that the flag is
not valid. Also there was an issue with the autoconf s
Here is an update to ENet 1.3.18.
ENet 1.3.18 (April 14, 2024):
* Packet sending performance improvements
* MTU negotiation fixes
* Checksum alignment fix
* No more dynamic initialization of checksum table
* ENET_SOCKOPT_TTL
* Other miscellaneous small improvements
ENet 1.3.17 (November 15, 202
Hello Kirill.
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
<98c1f03bc1d6c...@mx1.catap.net>:
...
|> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
|> <2fdd33f2325e6...@mx2.catap.net>:
|>|>|I imply that using ed25519 usually leads to malformed signature, \
...
|>|> Then these are not standard compliant. The DKIM standard 637
Hello Steffen,
On Sat, 11 May 2024 21:27:09 +0100,
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>
> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
> <2fdd33f2325e6...@mx2.catap.net>:
>
> |>|I imply that using ed25519 usually leads to malformed signature, and some
> |>|big hosting providers treat double signature as bad signature i
Hello Kirill.
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
<2fdd33f2325e6...@mx2.catap.net>:
|On Sat, 11 May 2024 00:21:18 +0100,
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
|> <5285e80cbc0d1...@mx2.catap.net>:
|
|BTW this is quite wired address which seems like Message-Id
That is what it is.
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:41:22PM -0400, Russ Sharek wrote:
> Edd said it looked good...
Now, wait just a gosh darn minute :)
Edd wanted the tests to be fixed too!
I thought you were going to use the do-test target that we discussed with
abieber@:
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 08:22:03AM -0600, Aaro
On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 12:47:21AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> That’s not a reason to set NO_TEST.
Correct, thanks a lot for pointing out this bad advice.
To elaborate a bit more: the upstream code does have regression tests
but the port just doesn't know how to run them and errors out. I wo
Greetings,
On Sat, 11 May 2024 00:21:18 +0100,
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote in
> <5285e80cbc0d1...@mx2.catap.net>:
BTW this is quite wired address which seems like Message-Id
> |
> |I imply that using ed25519 usually leads to malformed signature, and some
zpaqfranz got an update. Patch attached,
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile b/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile
index 6bc0775789e..32f6b64d2fc 100644
--- a/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile
+++ b/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
BROKEN-sparc64 = SIGBUS due to unaligned access when running
Hi,
With the switch to python-3.11 by default, mail/offlineimap stopped
working due to some (wrong) assertion:
AssertionError: Your sqlite is not multithreading safe.
The `sqlite3.threadsafety` changed in python-3.11, the value is set
dynamically instead of hard-coding it to 1, and offli
On Tue May 07, 2024 at 09:01:45PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> This updates keepassxc to latest version
>
> Changelog https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/releases/tag/2.7.8
>
> I'm not sure how to update the plist for each flavors? Otherwise
> it works on amd64 and compiles in a clean c
11 matches
Mail list logo
