On 2024/04/29 23:28, izder456 wrote:
> Hello ports@,
>
> I was working on a port earlier today that configures via GNU autotools.
>
> I needed the `configure` script, which wasn't included. When I grabbed
> the sources with `DIST_TUPLE`, `autoconf` didn't seem to generate one.
> (spat some really
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 01:45:03PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> A few nits:
> - the port doesn't install any doc and DESCR is rather light. I
> understand the tool is simple but still, it would be nice to at least
> have the examples from the README. Maybe just install that file u
ports@
Here the patch which switched all JDK to use actual number of online CPU on
machine, instead of total count.
Usually JDK application (Java, Scala, you name it) checks number of
available CPU to prepare working threads, and on OpenBSD it runs 2x threads
becaus hw.smt=0 by default.
This tri
hi,
smallish mechanical diff, totally untested, cf
https://www.dokuwiki.org/changes#release_2024-02-06a_kaos for changes.
ok ?
Landry
? dokuwiki-2023-04-04.diff
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/dokuwiki/Makefile,v
retrie
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 04:06:21PM GMT, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:52:14PM GMT, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > since kn@ reported dino build issue upstream, a fix was released
> >
> > I adapted the fix to work on latest release because it was done
> > on a file that does not exis
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:52:14PM GMT, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> since kn@ reported dino build issue upstream, a fix was released
>
> I adapted the fix to work on latest release because it was done
> on a file that does not exist yet in the tarball (got renamed?)
>
> tested on amd64, works fine ag
With the upcoming change in the transport layer for the tables, we've
also taken the chance to split them into separate repositories.
The idea is to remove the current opensmtpd-extra-* packages and import
the new set of opensmtpd-table-* packages (in the tarball attached.)
The queue, schedulers
Hello,
Just after 1.105.1, here is net/synapse 1.106.0
Tested on amd64
BEst RegardsIndex: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/synapse/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -u -p -r1.76 Makefile
--- Makefile 29 Apr 2024 07:44:40
since kn@ reported dino build issue upstream, a fix was released
I adapted the fix to work on latest release because it was done
on a file that does not exist yet in the tarball (got renamed?)
tested on amd64, works fine again
make update-patches insisted to add the "No newline at end of file",
On 2024/04/30 12:56, gonzalo wrote:
>
>
> On 4/27/24 9:03 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > still running fine on 7.4, will have a REVISION bump in -current ?
> >
> > ok ?
> >
> > Landry
>
> I think it's not need it anymore in -current, maybe sthen@ can confirm? :)
>
> I have the same
anyone?
On 4/16/24 12:17 PM, gonzalo wrote:
ping
On 3/25/24 9:56 AM, Gonzalo L. Rodriguez wrote:
Hello,
Update for Artty to 1.4.8:
https://github.com/mjwhitta/artty/releases/tag/v1.4.8
OK? Comments?
Cheers.-
Index: Makefile
anyone?
On 4/16/24 12:17 PM, gonzalo wrote:
ping
On 3/25/24 9:21 AM, Gonzalo L. Rodriguez wrote:
Hello,
Update for Varnish to 7.5.0:
https://varnish-cache.org/docs/7.5/whats-new/changes-7.5.html
OK? Comments?
Cheers.-
Index: Makefile
==
anyone?
On 4/16/24 12:16 PM, gonzalo wrote:
ping
On 4/8/24 9:56 AM, Gonzalo L. Rodriguez wrote:
Hello,
Update for Axel to 2.17.14:
https://github.com/axel-download-accelerator/axel/releases/tag/v2.17.14
OK? Comments?
Cheers.-
Index: Makefile
===
On 4/27/24 9:03 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
hi,
still running fine on 7.4, will have a REVISION bump in -current ?
ok ?
Landry
I think it's not need it anymore in -current, maybe sthen@ can confirm? :)
I have the same diff anyway.
OK.
On Tuesday, April 30, 2024 07:47 CEST, izder456 wrote:
> Awh jeez. It is too late for this.
>
> Fixed trailing whitespace in pkg/README, as well as removed leftover
> PLIST.orig.
>
> this should be the last of my mails in this thread unless something
> comes up.
>
> OK to merge?
lgtm, OK seba
Hi folks,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024, at 1:43 AM, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:36:11PM +0100, Tom Murphy wrote:
>
> Adam, if you're not using the port actively, would you be okay with
> passing on maintainership?
>>
I won’t be able to test in reasonable time. Thanks for keeping
16 matches
Mail list logo