Re: NEW: fonts/recursive 1.085

2023-09-11 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
> > Renato Aguiar writes: > > > Recursive Sans & Mono is a variable type family built for better > > > code & UI. > > > > > > https://www.recursive.design/ > > > > > > https://github.com/arrowtype/recursive > > > > > > Port attached. Imported. Thanks!

Re: UPDATE: objfw-1.0.2

2023-09-11 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Mon, Sep 11 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > Am 11.09.23 um 13:01 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: > >> This diff and the previous one were likely mangled by your MUA. There >> are hints available: >> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/email-clients.html >> Or you may just send

ipython 8.8.0 -> 8.13.2

2023-09-11 Thread Daniel Dickman
spyder 5.4.5 requires a newer version of ipython, claiming that a number of releases in the 8.x series are buggy. All reverse deps for ipython still build after this update. ok? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/ipyth

update ocamlbuild to 0.14.2

2023-09-11 Thread Daniel Dickman
The latest ocamlbuild claims support for ocaml 5.x. Reverse deps still build. ok? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/ocaml-ocamlbuild/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -u -p -u -r1.14 Makefile --- Makefile24 J

Re: REMOVE games/prboom-plus

2023-09-11 Thread Ryan Freeman
On Sat, Sep 09, 2023 at 06:12:36AM -0300, Lucas de Sena wrote: > PrBoom+ development had long moved from SourceForge to Github[1][2], > so the ports include an old version of the source engine. > > The development, however has been discontinued in June this year; a > last maintainer version (v2.6.

next update toward reviving spyder3

2023-09-11 Thread Daniel Dickman
Smaller follow-on diff for the previous updates: ipykernel 5.1.3 -> 5.3.0 spyder-kernels 1.8.1 -> 1.10.2 This gets us up to the minimum versions needed spyder 4.2.5. Once these updates are in we can start importing a number of new ports needed by spyder 4.x. ok? Index: devel/py

Re: [update] www/py-httpbin to 0.10.1

2023-09-11 Thread Lucas Raab
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 04:59:42PM +, Lucas Raab wrote: > Hello, > > Here's an update for www/py-httpbin. This has been make test-ed with its two > deps: devel/py-test-httpbin and devel/py-treq. > > Switching to a new upstream which has adopted it after no contact from the > prior upstream. >

Re: Switch sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 to openssl-3.0

2023-09-11 Thread Theo Buehler
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:14:30PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023/09/11 22:12, Theo Buehler wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 08:49:13PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2023/09/11 21:48, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:41:39PM +0200, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote:

Re: Switch sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 to openssl-3.0

2023-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023/09/11 22:12, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 08:49:13PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2023/09/11 21:48, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:41:39PM +0200, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > > > > Diff below switches sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 from OpenSSL-1.1 to >

Re: Switch sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 to openssl-3.0

2023-09-11 Thread Theo Buehler
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 08:49:13PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023/09/11 21:48, Theo Buehler wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:41:39PM +0200, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > > > Diff below switches sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 from OpenSSL-1.1 to > > > OpenSSL-3.0. Reason to switch is the EOL stat

Re: [new] www/py-flasgger

2023-09-11 Thread Lucas Raab
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 05:49:21PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023/09/03 17:15, Lucas Raab wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Here's a new port for py-flasgger which is a new dep for a www/py-httpbin > > update and possibly of interest for those who have APIs implemented in > > Flask. > > > > pk

Re: Switch sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 to openssl-3.0

2023-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023/09/11 21:48, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:41:39PM +0200, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > > Diff below switches sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 from OpenSSL-1.1 to > > OpenSSL-3.0. Reason to switch is the EOL status of OpenSSL-1.1.1. > > If you land this, please also update the comment

Re: Switch sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 to openssl-3.0

2023-09-11 Thread Theo Buehler
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:41:39PM +0200, Bjorn Ketelaars wrote: > Diff below switches sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 from OpenSSL-1.1 to > OpenSSL-3.0. Reason to switch is the EOL status of OpenSSL-1.1.1. If you land this, please also update the comments regarding bumps at the top of the openssl/1.1 and

Switch sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 to openssl-3.0

2023-09-11 Thread Bjorn Ketelaars
Diff below switches sysutils/borgbackup/2.0 from OpenSSL-1.1 to OpenSSL-3.0. Reason to switch is the EOL status of OpenSSL-1.1.1. It should be noted that OpenSSL is used for EVP_aes_256_ocb, and is linked statically to avoid conflicting with shared libcrypto from the base OS pulled in via dependen

Re: update spyder-kernels

2023-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023/09/11 00:59, Daniel Dickman wrote: > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/py-ipykernel/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.16 > diff -u -p -u -r1.16 Makefile > --- Makefile 13 Nov 2022 15:28:15 - 1.16 > +

Re: [new] www/py-flasgger

2023-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023/09/03 17:15, Lucas Raab wrote: > Hello, > > Here's a new port for py-flasgger which is a new dep for a www/py-httpbin > update and possibly of interest for those who have APIs implemented in Flask. > > pkg/DESCR: > Flask extension to extract OpenAPI-Specification from all Flask > views re

Re: [new] editors/litexl v2.1.1

2023-09-11 Thread Denis Fondras
Le Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:43:29PM +0200, Sebastien Marie a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:17:33PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote: > > Lite XL is derived from Lite. It is a lightweight text editor written > > mostly in > > Lua — it aims to provide something practical, pretty, small and fast easy

Re: Asterisk on Octeon

2023-09-11 Thread Alex Frolkin
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Has anyone had any success running Asterisk on Octeon (in my case, an > > EdgeRouter 6P, running OpenBSD 7.3)? > > [...] > No idea what's up on Octeon, but you could try building it with gcc > to check if that makes any differenc

Re: [new] editors/litexl v2.1.1

2023-09-11 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:17:33PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote: > Lite XL is derived from Lite. It is a lightweight text editor written mostly > in > Lua — it aims to provide something practical, pretty, small and fast easy to > modify and extend, or to use without doing either. > > The aim of Lit

cad/xtrkcad: fix build with gettext 0.22

2023-09-11 Thread Christian Weisgerber
I'm preparing to update devel/gettext to 0.22. The gettext tools have become more strict and no longer accept various dodgy input. /usr/obj/xtrkcad-5.2.2/xtrkcad-source-5.2.2GA/app/i18n/fi.po:12820: 'msgstr' is not a valid C format string, unlike 'msgid'. Reason: In the directive number 1, the

Re: [new] editors/litexl v2.1.1

2023-09-11 Thread Denis Fondras
Nevermind, sent too early :) Le Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:17:33PM +0200, Denis Fondras a écrit : > Lite XL is derived from Lite. It is a lightweight text editor written mostly > in > Lua — it aims to provide something practical, pretty, small and fast easy to > modify and extend, or to use without

[new] editors/litexl v2.1.1

2023-09-11 Thread Denis Fondras
Lite XL is derived from Lite. It is a lightweight text editor written mostly in Lua — it aims to provide something practical, pretty, small and fast easy to modify and extend, or to use without doing either. The aim of Lite XL compared to lite is to be more user friendly, improve the quality of fo

Re: KiCad exits with "illegal instruction"

2023-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023/09/10 20:25, Isaac Meerwarth wrote: > I wanted to report that KiCad exits with "illegal instruction" when you try > to launch a project. > cpu0: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-1240P, 4390.58 MHz, 06-9a-03, patch > 042c > cpu0: > FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA

Re: UPDATE: objfw-1.0.2

2023-09-11 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Am 11.09.23 um 13:01 schrieb Jeremie Courreges-Anglas: This diff and the previous one were likely mangled by your MUA. There are hints available: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/email-clients.html Or you may just send diffs as attachments (inline is still preferred). Ah, sorry

Re: Asterisk on Octeon

2023-09-11 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
-cc misc@ On Mon, Sep 11 2023, Alex Frolkin wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone had any success running Asterisk on Octeon (in my case, an > EdgeRouter 6P, running OpenBSD 7.3)? > > If I try to build the port, it fails in the same way as the automated > package builds, i.e.: > > > http://build-f

Re: UPDATE: objfw-1.0.2

2023-09-11 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Mon, Sep 11 2023, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > And here's an update to the just released 1.0.2 instead. This is 1.0.1 > with some additional fixes for macOS, so not important for OpenBSD. But > when updating anyway, why not update to the latest version :). This diff and the previous one were

Re: Asterisk on Octeon

2023-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023/09/11 10:39, Alex Frolkin wrote: > Hi all, > > Has anyone had any success running Asterisk on Octeon (in my case, an > EdgeRouter 6P, running OpenBSD 7.3)? > > If I try to build the port, it fails in the same way as the automated > package builds, i.e.: > > > http://build-failures.rha

Asterisk on Octeon

2023-09-11 Thread Alex Frolkin
Hi all, Has anyone had any success running Asterisk on Octeon (in my case, an EdgeRouter 6P, running OpenBSD 7.3)? If I try to build the port, it fails in the same way as the automated package builds, i.e.: http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/mips64/2023-08-29/telephony/asterisk/20.log I do