Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Klemens Nanni writes: > > better with 1.11.0pl20220207 so that if there is another proper release > > it won't need EPOCH > > What never version would require EPOCH? > 1.11.1, 1.12.0 and 2.0.0 would all be greater than 1.11.0.20220207, no? 1.11.0.1 would require an EPOCH. Upstreams adding an extr

sparc64 bulk build report

2022-02-08 Thread kmos
Bulk build on sparc64-0a.ports.openbsd.org Started : Sun Feb 6 16:32:06 MST 2022 Finished: Tue Feb 8 21:20:55 MST 2022 Duration: 2 Days 4 hours 49 minutes Built using OpenBSD 7.0-current (GENERIC.MP) #1182: Sat Feb 5 13:54:39 MST 2022 Built 9082 packages Number of packages built each day: Fe

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Andrew Krasavin
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 02:39:12AM +0300, Andrew Krasavin wrote: I was thinking a bit about updating the msgpack port. I came to the conclusion that we should probably bump SHARED_LIBS and also check the build of all ports that depend on msgpack. Intend to start doing this now. Apparently, by ch

Re: update fonts/iosevka-fonts to 11.2.7

2022-02-08 Thread Jose G Perez Taveras
Hello, I would like to know if there are any updates in regards to this diff? Best, josegpt On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 4:19 PM Jose G Perez Taveras wrote: > Hello, > > attached you will find an update for iosevka-fonts to 11.2.7. > > Best regards, > josegpt > > OK? >

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Andrew Krasavin
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Omar Polo wrote: I just finished a mini bulk build with `show-reverse-deps devel/gtest` in a clean proot and successfully built 1872 packages, so I'm quite sure it won't brings things down in real bulks. if it helps, I've uploaded the logs here. https:/

Re: NEW: security/sublist3r

2022-02-08 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Tuesday, February 08, 2022 23:23 CET, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/02/08 23:14, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > Had to @comment some tests related files in PLIST as I found them > > conflicting with pwntools. > > ...yeah, those shouldn't be there either > > lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/si

Re: NEW: security/sublist3r

2022-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/02/08 23:14, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Had to @comment some tests related files in PLIST as I found them conflicting > with pwntools. ...yeah, those shouldn't be there either lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/CHANGELOG.md lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/CONTRIBUTING.m

Re: NEW: security/dnsrecon

2022-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
> > Had to @comment some tests related files in PLIST as I found them > > conflicting with routersploit. PS that suggests the routersploit port is bad too.

Re: NEW: security/dnsrecon

2022-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/02/08 22:45, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Hi, > > attached a simple port of dnsrecon: > dnsrecon provides the ability to perform: > > Check all NS Records for Zone Transfers. > Enumerate General DNS Records for a given Domain (MX, SOA, NS, A, , > SPF and TXT). > Perform

NEW: security/sublist3r

2022-02-08 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, this is a simple port, similar to the just sent dnsrecon, however, following a different approach of DNS enumeration: Sublist3r is a python tool designed to enumerate subdomains of websites using OSINT. It helps penetration testers and bug hunters collect and gather subdomains for the domain

Re: py-cryptography update diff backup

2022-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/02/08 08:59, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > Stuart Henderson writes: > > > Thought I'd send out a diff for this update since I have it. > > > > I have held off on committing the update because rust is no longer > > optional, therefore it would break packages using it on non-rust > > archs (of t

NEW: security/dnsrecon

2022-02-08 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hi, attached a simple port of dnsrecon: dnsrecon provides the ability to perform: Check all NS Records for Zone Transfers. Enumerate General DNS Records for a given Domain (MX, SOA, NS, A, , SPF and TXT). Perform common SRV Record Enumeration. Top Level Domain (TLD) Expansion

NEW: devel/p5-MooseX-Singleton

2022-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
ok to import? needed for net/p5-Zonemaster updates (slightly overdue, I only noticed they were outdated by chance when I was looking at something else - portroach didn't find them) $ cat p5-MooseX-Singleton/pkg/DESCR A singleton is a class that has only one instance in an application. MooseX::Sin

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Andrew Krasavin
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 05:52:46PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: Personally, I thought that using PATCHFILES was always preferable to adding normal ports patches. Apparently this is not the case, and in cases where the changes are minor and affect a single file, 'normal ports patches' in the '

Re: py-cryptography update diff backup

2022-02-08 Thread Aaron Bieber
Stuart Henderson writes: > Thought I'd send out a diff for this update since I have it. > > I have held off on committing the update because rust is no longer > optional, therefore it would break packages using it on non-rust > archs (of the ones we're building packages for anyway, that's > arm

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/02/08 20:32, Andrew Krasavin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 12:31:39PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > +MASTER_SITES0 = https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/ > > > +# Fix gtest-help-test failure on OpenBSD > > > +# https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/3751 > > > +PA

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 12:31:39PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/02/07 22:18, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > -GH_TAGNAME=release-$V > > -PKGNAME = gtest-$V > > +GH_COMMIT= 43efa0a4efd40c78b9210d15373112081899a97c > > +DISTNAME = gtest-1.11.0.20220207 > > better with 1.11.0pl20220207

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 08:32:53PM +0300, Andrew Krasavin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 12:31:39PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > > +MASTER_SITES0 = https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/ > > > +# Fix gtest-help-test failure on OpenBSD > > > +# https://github.com/google/googletes

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Andrew Krasavin
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 12:31:39PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: +MASTER_SITES0 =https://github.com/google/googletest/commit/ +# Fix gtest-help-test failure on OpenBSD +# https://github.com/google/googletest/pull/3751 +PATCHFILES = fix-gtest-help-test-{}631f4f99.patch:0 it just tou

Re: sysutils/hw-probe to 1.6-release (maintainer update)

2022-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/02/08 08:05, David Dahlberg wrote: > Find attached an update of hw-probe-1.6beta to 1.6release. I hope the > naming convention is alright. thanks, committed with DISTNAME removed to fallback to the default based on GH_PROJECT/GH_TAGNAME (i.e. hw-probe-1.6).

Re: [update] net/synapse 1.51.0

2022-02-08 Thread Aaron Bieber
Aaron Bieber writes: > Renaud Allard writes: > >> [[S/MIME Signed Part:Undecided]] >> >> Hello, >> >> Here is a patch for net/synapse to 1.51.0 >> >> Best Regards >> >> [2. text/x-patch; synapse-1.51.0.diff]... >> >> [[End of S/MIME Signed Part]] > > Do you have a new port for the matrix-common

Re: Picard Error

2022-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
> Cc: OpenBSD Please use ports@openbsd.org, few people are on ports-bugs@ and it is not really used. On 2022/02/08 13:29, su.root wrote: > Hi All, > > on current I am receiving the following error while trying to launch > picard: I'll add the missing dependency. You can just pkg_add py3-yaml

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/02/07 22:18, Klemens Nanni wrote: > -GH_TAGNAME= release-$V > -PKGNAME =gtest-$V > +GH_COMMIT= 43efa0a4efd40c78b9210d15373112081899a97c > +DISTNAME = gtest-1.11.0.20220207 better with 1.11.0pl20220207 so that if there is another proper release it won't need EPOCH > +MASTER_SITES0

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Omar Polo
Klemens Nanni writes: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Omar Polo wrote: > [...] >> so OK for gtest as long as you don't forget to fix msgpack too :) >> >> (a revision bump shouldn't be needed in this case, since gtest is >> bumping SHARED_LIBS too, but maybe to play on the safe side a

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:46:09AM +0100, Omar Polo wrote: > Klemens Nanni writes: > > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:11:23AM +0300, Andrew Krasavin wrote: > >> I apologize for the long answer, it's been quite a busy day. > > sorry for the late reply, building the packages too longer than what > i

Re: [UPDATE (trying)] math/hdf5 1.12.0 -> 1.12.1

2022-02-08 Thread Martin Reindl
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 06:02:08PM +, jmeis...@posteo.ch wrote: > > Here is the diff I am currently testing on sparc64/arm64. More tests > > welcome, > > even on amd64. > > On -current, amd64, this is building fine + passing all "gmake check" and > "gmake check-install" tests. > > I've also r

Re: UPDATE: gtest 1.11.0 + some patches from upstream

2022-02-08 Thread Omar Polo
Klemens Nanni writes: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:11:23AM +0300, Andrew Krasavin wrote: >> I apologize for the long answer, it's been quite a busy day. sorry for the late reply, building the packages too longer than what i thought >> > Another thing, upstream won't release further versions and