Re: add unveil path required by fcitx to chromium

2021-09-08 Thread Kevin Lo
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 05:31:01AM +, Yifei Zhan wrote: > > Hi, > > At the moment fcitx and ibus don't work with chromium, after some > hacking around with ktrace/kdump, it looks like read access to > ~/.config/fcitx is required for fcitx to work, which is what the > following patch does.

UPDATE: databases/postgresql-previous 12.8

2021-09-08 Thread Mark Patruck
Hi Pierre-Emmanuel, the following diff updates databases/postgresql-previous to 12.8, which fixes over 75 bugs and addresses CVE-2021-3677 (Memory disclosure in certain queries) Notes: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/release-12-8.html Lightly tested on amd64 -Mark -- Mark Patruck

UPDATE: databases/postgresql 13.4

2021-09-08 Thread Mark Patruck
Hi Pierre-Emmanuel, the following diff updates databases/postgresql to 13.4, which fixes over 75 bugs and addresses CVE-2021-3677 (Memory disclosure in certain queries) Notes: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/release-13-4.html Running fine on amd64 for a few days now. -Mark -- Mar

[macppc / lld] devel/gmp text relocation

2021-09-08 Thread George Koehler
Hello naddy, about devel/gmp, After OpenBSD/macppc switched to lld, a text relocation in libgmp.a began to cause linker errors. I want to patch devel/gmp's powerpc32 asm to remove this text relocation. The diff is at the end of this mail, is this ok? Charlene pointed me at a build failure in de

Re: update net/tdlib 1.7.5 -> 1.7.7

2021-09-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/09/08 23:35, Omar Polo wrote: > Hello ports, > > Please find attached the patch to update net/tdlib to its latest > "unofficial minor release". Tested with net/tg and telega.el. > > Regarding the library bump, there doesn't seem to be any removed > functions or struct changed, but there

update net/tdlib 1.7.5 -> 1.7.7

2021-09-08 Thread Omar Polo
Hello ports, Please find attached the patch to update net/tdlib to its latest "unofficial minor release". Tested with net/tg and telega.el. Regarding the library bump, there doesn't seem to be any removed functions or struct changed, but there were a lot of changes like - void close(Pr

Re: devel/scons: [wip] update to 4.2.0

2021-09-08 Thread Omar Polo
"Kirill Bychkov" writes: > [...] >> - graphics/mapnik >> breaks because of python2. Easy to fix, but then fails at >> linking: >> >> 8< >> ld: error: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 cannot be used against symbol typeinfo >> for >> boost::wrapexcept; recompile

Re: NEW: devel/re2

2021-09-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/09/08 23:09, Omar Polo wrote: > > Stuart Henderson writes: > > > On 2021/09/08 22:07, Omar Polo wrote: > >> > >> Denis Fondras writes: > >> > >> > RE2 is a fast, safe, thread-friendly C++ library alternative to > >> > backtracking regular expression engines like those used in PCRE, >

Re: NEW: devel/re2

2021-09-08 Thread Omar Polo
Stuart Henderson writes: > On 2021/09/08 22:07, Omar Polo wrote: >> >> Denis Fondras writes: >> >> > RE2 is a fast, safe, thread-friendly C++ library alternative to >> > backtracking regular expression engines like those used in PCRE, >> > Perl, and Python. >> > >> > https://github.com/google

Re: devel/libgnt BUILD_DEPENDS textproc/gtk-doc

2021-09-08 Thread Brad Smith
Ah, yes, you're right. Thanks. On September 8, 2021 12:59:00 p.m. Caspar Schutijser wrote: Hi, While building devel/libgnt I'm getting the following error message during the configure stage: Program gtkdoc-scan found: NO ../../pobj/libgnt-2.14.2/libgnt-2.14.2/doc/meso

Re: NEW: devel/re2

2021-09-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/09/08 22:07, Omar Polo wrote: > > Denis Fondras writes: > > > RE2 is a fast, safe, thread-friendly C++ library alternative to > > backtracking regular expression engines like those used in PCRE, > > Perl, and Python. > > > > https://github.com/google/re2 > > > > [2. application/x-tar-gz;

Re: NEW: devel/re2

2021-09-08 Thread Omar Polo
Denis Fondras writes: > RE2 is a fast, safe, thread-friendly C++ library alternative to > backtracking regular expression engines like those used in PCRE, > Perl, and Python. > > https://github.com/google/re2 > > [2. application/x-tar-gz; re2-20210901.tgz]... Hello, I had a local port for an e

py3-only: security/py-PyNaCl devel/py-asn1 net/py-snmp

2021-09-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
security/py-PyNaCl/Makefile:MAINTAINER =Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse devel/py-asn1/Makefile:MAINTAINER = Benoit Lecocq net/py-snmp/Makefile:MAINTAINER = Adam Wolk Following paramiko/py-cryptography/etc moving to py3-only there are some other modules which I thin

Re: [UPDATE] multimedia/mlt

2021-09-08 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sun Mar 07, 2021 at 02:50:10PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > This makes use of the libebur128 port I posted a few hours ago > I've had most of this in my dir for a while, I actually got stumped on > something stupid in shotcut. > > I've built and used shotcut with this without issue. I've also bui

Re: WIP: Pidgin 2.14.6

2021-09-08 Thread Stefan Hagen
Stefan Hagen wrote: > Brad Smith wrote: > > Here is my work in progress update to Pidgin 2.14.6. > > > > I don't see any indication of any major API changes. Any > > and all testing welcome especially with the various plugins > > I see in the ports tree. > > Hi, > > I tested this version with te

Re: WIP: Pidgin 2.14.6

2021-09-08 Thread Stefan Hagen
Brad Smith wrote: > Here is my work in progress update to Pidgin 2.14.6. > > I don't see any indication of any major API changes. Any > and all testing welcome especially with the various plugins > I see in the ports tree. Hi, I tested this version with telegram-purple and XMPP. Both is working.

WIP: Pidgin 2.14.6

2021-09-08 Thread Brad Smith
Here is my work in progress update to Pidgin 2.14.6. I don't see any indication of any major API changes. Any and all testing welcome especially with the various plugins I see in the ports tree. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/c

UPDATE: Tor Browser 10.5.6

2021-09-08 Thread Caspar Schutijser
Hi, The diff below updates Tor Browser to 10.5.6. Tested on amd64. More information (not up yet): https://blog.torproject.org/new-release-tor-browser-1056 This is still based on the "old" Firefox ESR 78. Thanks, Caspar Schutijser Index: meta/tor-browser/Makefile ===

Re: devel/libgnt BUILD_DEPENDS textproc/gtk-doc

2021-09-08 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Committed, thanks. Since the lack of gtkdoc meant a build failure I omitted the REVISION bump. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

new devel/p5-File-TreeCreate

2021-09-08 Thread Alexander Bluhm
Hi ok to import p5-File-TreeCreate 0.0.1 ? recursively create a directory tree Needed to update some modules. bluhm p5-File-TreeCreate.tgz Description: application/tar-gz

Re: lang/ghc

2021-09-08 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 06:56:05AM -0700, Greg Steuck wrote: > Matthias Kilian writes: > > > +@@ -1024,8 +1024,10 @@ static void report_summary(const RTSSummaryStats* > > sum) > > + > > + for (g = 0; g < RtsFlags.GcFlags.generations; g++) { > > + int prefix_length = 0;

Re: ports build cycle

2021-09-08 Thread Paul de Weerd
Hi Simon, On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 06:02:18PM +0200, Simon Hoffmann wrote: | Hey yall! | | Excuse the dumb question, but I couldn't find any info on the ports build cycle. When | looking at the ports, I can see eg rspamd in v3 (released two weeks ago), but when | using pkg_info -Q, I only see v2

Re: [NEW] mail/hydroxide

2021-09-08 Thread Juris M.
Hello, again. I've updated the port (see attached tarball) according to your requests. On Tuesday, September 7th, 2021 at 9:35 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2021/09/07 13:35, Juris M. wrote: > > Additionally, he noted that ports submitted from ProtonMail users are often > > of shoddy qualit

Re: mail/exim and printf("%n")

2021-09-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/09/08 11:12, Renaud Allard wrote: > I discussed with exim guys and it seems they are quiet reluctant at > modifying "correct C code". It's not correct code that the %n abort is there to protect against. It's to prevent cases with incorrect code from turning into a hole. Hopefully Exim's

Re: mail/exim and printf("%n")

2021-09-08 Thread Theo de Raadt
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08 2021, Renaud Allard wrote: > > [...] > > > I discussed with exim guys and it seems they are quiet reluctant at > > modifying "correct C code". > > Even sprintf uses can be correct, it doesn't mean that people should use it. the exim people tal

Re: mail/exim and printf("%n")

2021-09-08 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Wed, Sep 08 2021, Renaud Allard wrote: [...] > I discussed with exim guys and it seems they are quiet reluctant at > modifying "correct C code". Even sprintf uses can be correct, it doesn't mean that people should use it. > At least the acl.c one will cause issues as > we have seen with th

devel/libgnt BUILD_DEPENDS textproc/gtk-doc

2021-09-08 Thread Caspar Schutijser
Hi, While building devel/libgnt I'm getting the following error message during the configure stage: Program gtkdoc-scan found: NO ../../pobj/libgnt-2.14.2/libgnt-2.14.2/doc/meson.build:29:6: ERROR: Program 'gtkdoc-scan' not found A full log can be found at /home/ports/pob

ports build cycle

2021-09-08 Thread Simon Hoffmann
Hey yall! Excuse the dumb question, but I couldn't find any info on the ports build cycle. When looking at the ports, I can see eg rspamd in v3 (released two weeks ago), but when using pkg_info -Q, I only see v2.7. So: when are new port versions build as binary and available through pkg_add?

Re: Warnings for %n in format strings

2021-09-08 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:37:34PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2021/09/07 21:24, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > Earlier today, semarie@ committed a change that will now cause base > > clang to warn when the %n specifier appears in a format string for > > the printf(3) family of functions:

Re: Warnings for %n in format strings

2021-09-08 Thread Theo de Raadt
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2021/09/07 21:24, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > Earlier today, semarie@ committed a change that will now cause base > > clang to warn when the %n specifier appears in a format string for > > the printf(3) family of functions: > > > > warning: '%n' format specifier

Re: lang/ghc

2021-09-08 Thread Greg Steuck
Thank you for looking into this, I meant to, but was slightly turned off by the depth of the rabbit hole. I'll annotate it below. Matthias Kilian writes: > +@@ -1024,8 +1024,10 @@ static void report_summary(const RTSSummaryStats* sum) > + > + for (g = 0; g < RtsFlags.GcFlags.generations

Re: [NEW] mail/hydroxide

2021-09-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/09/08 13:51, Juris M. wrote: > Hello, again. > > I've updated the port (see attached tarball) according to your requests. > > On Tuesday, September 7th, 2021 at 9:35 PM, Stuart Henderson > wrote: > > On 2021/09/07 13:35, Juris M. wrote: > > > Additionally, he noted that ports submitted

Re: [NEW] www/unit

2021-09-08 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
Hi Stuart, thanks for the update. On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 02:49:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > It is only about 24h since you posted your first message. Have patience. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- Sergey Osokin

Re: [NEW] www/unit

2021-09-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
It is only about 24h since you posted your first message. Have patience. On 2021/09/08 13:19, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > Hi, > > could you please provide an update. > Thank you. > > -- > Sergey Osokin > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:56:03PM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I

Re: [NEW] www/unit

2021-09-08 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
Hi, could you please provide an update. Thank you. -- Sergey Osokin On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:56:03PM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm glad to share with you NGINX Unit port for OpenBSD has been created. > > In addition to the port (it's been attached to this email as a tar

Re: mail/exim and printf("%n")

2021-09-08 Thread Renaud Allard
On 9/2/21 10:46 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: On Thu, Sep 02 2021, "Theo de Raadt" wrote: Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: exim apparently uses printf("%n"), which is currently forbidden (libc calls abort(3)). I don't want us to fix all the %n uses in the ports tree, but instead wa

Re: Warnings for %n in format strings

2021-09-08 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2021/09/07 21:24, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Earlier today, semarie@ committed a change that will now cause base > clang to warn when the %n specifier appears in a format string for > the printf(3) family of functions: > > warning: '%n' format specifier support is deactivated and will call a

回复: converters/p5-Convert-ASN1: security update to 0.31

2021-09-08 Thread wen heping
ping ... 发件人: owner-po...@openbsd.org 代表 wen heping 发送时间: 2021年8月23日 8:23 收件人: ports@openbsd.org 主题: converters/p5-Convert-ASN1: security update to 0.31 Hi, ports@: Here is a patch for converters/p5-Convert-ASN1: i) Update to 0.31 ii) Fi

devel/p5-Test-MockModule: Update to 0.177.0

2021-09-08 Thread wen heping
Hi, ports@: Here is a simple patch for devel/p5-Test-MockModule to update to 0.177.0, it build well and pass all tests on amd64-current system. 3 ports depends on devel/p5-Test-MockModule, all build well and pass all tests too. Any comments ? wenIndex: Makefile =

Re: Warnings for %n in format strings

2021-09-08 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Stuart Henderson: > henning: do you still use openldap 2.3? if not, the port is a bit of a > source of problems and it would be helpful to remove it (these days 2.4 > has a backend which is nothing to do with berkeley db which iirc was the > original problem) In case we still need it, we can just

Re: NEW: www/sfeed and www/sfeed_curses (RSS/Atom tool and reader)

2021-09-08 Thread Frederic Cambus
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 06:49:03PM +, Brian Callahan wrote: > > > > It would be nice if it is packaged in the OpenBSD 7.0 release. > > If someone wants to import with my ok too, go ahead. I won't be able to get > around to this myself for the next several days. This has now been committed, t

Re: [New] fonts/juliamono

2021-09-08 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Hi, Laurence Tratt writes: > > There is a way (documented in bsd.port.mk) but I have always found > > the versioned DIST_SUBDIR both more intuitive and easier to remember. > > Stuart also pointed that out to me and said that it's preferable to not use > subdirs if possible. So I attach an update t

sparc64 bulk build report

2021-09-08 Thread kmos
Bulk build on sparc64-0a.ports.openbsd.org Started : Mon Sep 6 16:40:55 MDT 2021 Finished: Wed Sep 8 01:45:45 MDT 2021 Duration: 1 Days 9 hours 5 minutes Built using OpenBSD 7.0-beta (GENERIC.MP) #962: Mon Sep 6 09:23:38 MDT 2021 Built 7980 packages Number of packages built each day: Sep 6: