Re: [update] lang/rust 1.23

2018-01-26 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 06:10:43AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:27:16PM +0100, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The following diff updates lang/rust to 1.23 (released since approx 3 > > weeks). > > > > I was still able to build it on i386 (but with effort), so I

Re: [update] dunst-1.3.0

2018-01-26 Thread Timo Myyrä
Klemens Nanni writes: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:13:17AM +0200, Timo Myyrä wrote: >> > Klemens Nanni writes: >> >> Paths in the example dunst.rc need to be adjusted so copying it over >> >> will work without manually fixing them. > Yuck, I forgot to include those in my earlier diff, sorry. > >

Re: NEW: news/nzbget

2018-01-26 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:48:50AM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote: > Enclosed a new tarball which addresses, amongst others, the comments above. Forgot in my earlier mail: Makefile is marked exectuable in both your tarballs.

Re: [update] dunst-1.3.0

2018-01-26 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:13:17AM +0200, Timo Myyrä wrote: > > Klemens Nanni writes: > >> Paths in the example dunst.rc need to be adjusted so copying it over > >> will work without manually fixing them. Yuck, I forgot to include those in my earlier diff, sorry. > Here is an updated diff to incl

Re: NEW: news/nzbget

2018-01-26 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 07:48:50AM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote: > On Sat 20/01/2018 21:39, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 08:05:04PM +0100, Björn Ketelaars wrote: > > > New port for NZBGet > > > > > > pkg/DESCR: > > > NZBGet is a binary newsgrabber, which downloads files from us

Re: [Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:36:00PM +0200, mazocomp wrote: > Landry, if I install unpatched port, it refuses to run with "permission > denied" error. In this case I have to forget about binary updating and > compile this port manually. Then you get a real reason to help fixing the actual issue, ins

Re: [UPDATE] devel/py-xdis

2018-01-26 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:18:38AM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote: > this is the diff to update py-xdis to latest release. > > I enabled regress tests because it works fine with python3 FLAVOR. On amd64 py3 tests run fine but py2 throw an error, see attached log. You're missing TEST_DEPENDS as well as

Re: python.port.mk: Respect SEPARATE_BUILD in MODPY_DISTUTILS_BUILD

2018-01-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/01/26 19:46, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:56:04PM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote: > > Le 26-01-2018 12:13, Marc Espie a écrit : > > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:22:30PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > > Out-of-tree builds for simple python ports are currently built in > >

Re: [PATCH] for rebar16, rebar17, rebar18 and rebar19

2018-01-26 Thread Bill Karh
On 01/24/18 11:58, William Karh wrote: Hey ports, After install, the rebar1[6789] package complains about an undefined main function. For example: $ doas pkg_add rebar16 quirks-2.406 signed on 2018-01-23T00:21:31Z rebar16-2.6.2: ok $ rebar16 escript: exception error: undefined function reba

Re: [update] net/transmission

2018-01-26 Thread Josh Grosse
Attached is a merged "v3" patch set for -current, as there was an interceding commit: revision 1.123 date: 2018/01/25 15:33:16; author: rsadowski; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2; commitid: zxqeNFQxY7ghacfc; s/MODQT5_USE_GCC4_MODULE/MODQT5_USE_CXX11/ from last Qt updat

Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2017

2018-01-26 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:41:04PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > However, I only had texlive_base and texlive_texmf-buildset installed, > so that update test wasn't complete. I'll retest this with the > complete set (texlive_texmf-minimal and texlive_texmf-full) on my > work desktop tomorrow

Re: python.port.mk: Respect SEPARATE_BUILD in MODPY_DISTUTILS_BUILD

2018-01-26 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 05:56:04PM +0100, Remi Pointel wrote: > Le 26-01-2018 12:13, Marc Espie a écrit : > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:22:30PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > Out-of-tree builds for simple python ports are currently built in > > > WRKSRC > > > even when SEPARATE_BUILD is set. >

Re: [Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread mazocomp
Landry, if I install unpatched port, it refuses to run with "permission denied" error. In this case I have to forget about binary updating and compile this port manually.

Re: sysutils/logfmon moved to github

2018-01-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/01/26 18:12, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 04:15:06PM +0100, Marcus MERIGHI wrote: > > Anything *I* can/need/should do? > > This is sort of a ping... > Since sthen only build tested it, you can run the test suite (I take > there is one since NO_TEST=yes is gone). I remove

Re: sysutils/logfmon moved to github

2018-01-26 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 04:15:06PM +0100, Marcus MERIGHI wrote: > Anything *I* can/need/should do? > This is sort of a ping... Since sthen only build tested it, you can run the test suite (I take there is one since NO_TEST=yes is gone). > It runs, but I'm only in a rather slow move to get it cums

Re: python.port.mk: Respect SEPARATE_BUILD in MODPY_DISTUTILS_BUILD

2018-01-26 Thread Remi Pointel
Le 26-01-2018 12:13, Marc Espie a écrit : On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:22:30PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: Out-of-tree builds for simple python ports are currently built in WRKSRC even when SEPARATE_BUILD is set. Simple example: $ cd /usr/ports/www/linkchecker $ make build

Re: [Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/01/26 17:17, mazocomp wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:56:11PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2018/01/26 16:36, mazocomp wrote: > > > +Flavor wx - build with W|X reliance. > > > > Of course we have thought about this before! But it's not as simple as > > you propose. Done in

Re: UPDATE: graphics/libraw

2018-01-26 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Thu, Jan 25 2018, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Simple update to the latest stable version. > > Changlog: > > https://github.com/LibRaw/LibRaw/compare/0.18.7...master > > ok? I don't want to build all consumers. It is worthwhile to push it > into a bulk? Not worth it IMO, the tarball diff is trivia

Re: [Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread mazocomp
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:56:11PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018/01/26 16:36, mazocomp wrote: > > +Flavor wx - build with W|X reliance. > > Of course we have thought about this before! But it's not as simple as > you propose. Done in the way you suggest as a simple either/or flavou

Re: [Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 04:59:40PM +0200, mazocomp wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:49:48PM +0100, Solène Rapenne wrote: > > Le 2018-01-26 15:36, mazocomp a écrit : > > > # Python itself is clean, but some extensions e.g. py-cryptography > > > # and QtWebKit require W|X mappings. > > > +.if ${

Re: sysutils/logfmon moved to github

2018-01-26 Thread Marcus MERIGHI
Thanks for looking at it! Anything *I* can/need/should do? This is sort of a ping... It runs, but I'm only in a rather slow move to get it cumstomized, no real world testing atm... Marcus s...@spacehopper.org (Stuart Henderson), 2018.01.17 (Wed) 12:40 (CET): > On 2018/01/17 12:31, Marcus MERIG

Re: [Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread mazocomp
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:49:48PM +0100, Solène Rapenne wrote: > Le 2018-01-26 15:36, mazocomp a écrit : > > # Python itself is clean, but some extensions e.g. py-cryptography > > # and QtWebKit require W|X mappings. > > +.if ${FLAVOR} == "wx" > > USE_WXNEEDED = Yes > > +.endif > > > > .if ${

Re: [Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2018/01/26 16:36, mazocomp wrote: > +Flavor wx - build with W|X reliance. Of course we have thought about this before! But it's not as simple as you propose. Done in the way you suggest as a simple either/or flavour is going to cause too many problems and confusion with dependent ports and

Re: [Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
If you don't like wxallowed/wxneeded, great, that's the point! But the way forward is to fix offenders, not to pretend you can sweep the problem under the rug with untested diffs. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Re: [Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread Solène Rapenne
Le 2018-01-26 15:36, mazocomp a écrit : # Python itself is clean, but some extensions e.g. py-cryptography # and QtWebKit require W|X mappings. +.if ${FLAVOR} == "wx" USE_WXNEEDED = Yes +.endif .if ${VERSION} == "3.6" ALL_TARGET = all IIRC python doesn't have W^X issue but some python l

[Patch] Python for non wxallowed /usr/local

2018-01-26 Thread mazocomp
diff --git lang/python/2.7/pkg/DESCR-main lang/python/2.7/pkg/DESCR-main index adfd63f9840..9d7c54a9e93 100644 --- lang/python/2.7/pkg/DESCR-main +++ lang/python/2.7/pkg/DESCR-main @@ -12,3 +12,5 @@ written in C or C++. On most systems such modules may be dynamically loaded. Python is also adapta

UPDATE: devel/boost

2018-01-26 Thread Rafael Sadowski
Hi All! This time easier than last time and a relative easy update to the current boost. Changelog: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html I did not build all consumers. Bulk feedback wanted. Best regards, Rafael Sadowski Index: Makefile ==

Re: cmake.port.mk and DEBUG

2018-01-26 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:22:56PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21 2018, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 21 2018, Landry Breuil wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 06:00:24PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jan 20 2018, Stuart Henderson

Re: cmake.port.mk and DEBUG

2018-01-26 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Sun, Jan 21 2018, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sun, Jan 21 2018, Landry Breuil wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 06:00:24PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 20 2018, Stuart Henderson wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> > How about making the cmake debug-build stuff de

Re: python.port.mk: Respect SEPARATE_BUILD in MODPY_DISTUTILS_BUILD

2018-01-26 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:22:30PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > Out-of-tree builds for simple python ports are currently built in WRKSRC > even when SEPARATE_BUILD is set. > > Simple example: > > $ cd /usr/ports/www/linkchecker > $ make build > [...] > $ make show='SEPARA