On (2016-07-13 01:38), Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:27:08PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > What are we going to do with lang/mono?
> >
> > During amd64 bulk builds, it typically fails with random crashes
> > when there are other build jobs on the same machine. If t
Hello ports@,
Here is a new port : www/kore
Tested on: amd64.
>From DESCR:
Kore is an easy to use web application framework for writing scalable
web APIs in C.
Its main goals are security, scalability and allowing rapid
development and deployment of such APIs.
Because of this Kore is an ideal
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:27:08PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> What are we going to do with lang/mono?
>
> During amd64 bulk builds, it typically fails with random crashes
> when there are other build jobs on the same machine. If the machine
> is quiescent except for the mono build, it s
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 07:37:52PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
>
> +1 for nuking it from me too.
>
> Ciao!
> David
>
>
I believe that spatstat module in R requires lang/gfortran to compile. Some
other useful modules depend on spatstat, e.g. radiomics.
Please do not delete lang/gfortran, I am in
What are we going to do with lang/mono?
During amd64 bulk builds, it typically fails with random crashes
when there are other build jobs on the same machine. If the machine
is quiescent except for the mono build, it succeeds.
If you have been following the package snapshots, you may have
noticed
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:09:12PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/07/04 15:31, Joerg Jung wrote:
> > > I don't see much point in providing both py27 and py3 flavours
> > > for an end-user program rather than a python library, I think I would
> > > just hardcode it to py3.
> >
> > Stupid
Here's a straightforward patch to switch ruby to use the getpwuid_shadow
and getpwnam_shadow functions. Lightly tested on amd64. Will test on
i386. OKs?
Thanks,
Jeremy
Index: 1.8/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/ruby/1.8/Mak
Il 12 luglio 2016 19:21:33 CEST, j...@wxcvbn.org ha scritto:
>Just like Qingshan I thought that lang/gfortran was the real deal.
>I should have looked closer. Let's forget about the conflict. sthen
>and you proposed to delete lang/gfortran: I think that's a good idea.
+1 for nuking it from me
Tobias Ulmer writes:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:16:48PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> Qingshan Chen writes:
>>
>> > Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
>> > m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
>> > the right pe
Martijn Rijkeboer [mart...@bunix.org] wrote:
> > I can't tell from your message whether this is the following problem:
> > There is a diff being discussed that makes pledge "recvfd" stricter. It
> > is plausible that Theo put this diff into the most recent snapshot. One
> > result is that this diff
On 2016/07/12 12:14, Steve wrote:
> Stuart Henderson openbsd.org> writes:
>
> >
> > On 2015/08/11 10:39, Максим wrote:
> > > What is the cause for removed kerberos support in this packet? Is the
> removed
> > > support for kerberos in OpenBSD related to it?
> >
> > Yes. I will look at a diff if
Stuart Henderson openbsd.org> writes:
>
> On 2015/08/11 10:39, Максим wrote:
> > What is the cause for removed kerberos support in this packet? Is the
removed
> > support for kerberos in OpenBSD related to it?
>
> Yes. I will look at a diff if somebody would like to send one, but I have
> no ke
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 12, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:51:19 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn
> wrote:
>
>> I think I may have found the issue. The plist
>> under /usr/ports/plist/... still had the wrong info. Should this
>> have been fixed by $ make updat
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:51:19 -0500, Edgar Pettijohn
wrote:
> I think I may have found the issue. The plist
> under /usr/ports/plist/... still had the wrong info. Should this
> have been fixed by $ make update-plist? If so there may be a bug
> involved. If not I guess I should double check the
On 2016/07/11 16:51, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> On 16-07-11 09:21:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/07/10 23:54, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> > > I'm attempting to port libxlsxwriter. The problem I'm having is
> > > that I can't seem to get the examples to install correctly.
> > >
> > > In the Ma
On 2016/07/11 18:00, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> I think you missed ports lock, you will have to wait a month or so before
> port imports can start again.
Nothing has been announced about when port imports can start again.
16 matches
Mail list logo
