Thanks Sebastien, please see my comments inline.
> the port is fairly complete. Just some points:
> - patches/patch-mlton_Makefile
> "PREFIX has to be /usr/local for OpenBSD"
>
> in fact, "/usr/local" shouldn't be directly used: you should use
> LOCALBASE variable (default to /usr/l
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 06:15:32PM +1200, m...@extensibl.com wrote:
> Hi ports@,
>
> Please help to review and test the port. Maybe someone is ready to
> import it into CVS?
>
the port is fairly complete. Just some points:
- patches/patch-mlton_Makefile
"PREFIX has to be /usr/local for Ope
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:18:07PM +0200, Solène wrote:
>
> Up
>
> What would be required to get the port imported ? I use it and actually I
> didn't had any error.
>
> Regards
>
Despite the fact we will enter very soon in "slow motion" due to
locking, there are several things still required:
On 2016/07/07 18:43, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Theo de Raadt writes:
>
> >> I don't think that getpwnam_shadow is a big concern. Fixes can be
> >> applied to -stable with relatively minor churn, if needed.
> >
> > They are being discovered slower than I expected. Maybe there are only
>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 10:51:18PM -0500, Aaron Poffenberger wrote:
> On 06/27/16 17:41, Henrique N. Lengler wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:26:10AM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> >> Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:50:01 -0300 "Henrique N. Lengler"
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:09:10AM +0300, l
Released today:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-announce/2016/000380.html
Addresses:
CVE-2016-2119 (Client side SMB2/3 required signing can be downgraded)
Tests welcome.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/samb
Released today:
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-announce/2016/000380.html
Addresses:
CVE-2016-2119 (Client side SMB2/3 required signing can be downgraded)
Tests welcome.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/samb
Theo de Raadt writes:
>> I don't think that getpwnam_shadow is a big concern. Fixes can be
>> applied to -stable with relatively minor churn, if needed.
>
> They are being discovered slower than I expected. Maybe there are only
> a handful left.
>
> > I don't think that 6.0 can ship with wxnee
Le 2016-07-03 15:15, Sebastien Marie a écrit :
I might have been to quick to told OK. sorry.
Additionnal questions for people really aware in perl port stuff (or
more aware than me at least):
The package is pure perl code, I think `PKG_ARCH = *' has to be set.
When building, the following war
> I don't think that getpwnam_shadow is a big concern. Fixes can be
> applied to -stable with relatively minor churn, if needed.
They are being discovered slower than I expected. Maybe there are only
a handful left.
> I don't think that 6.0 can ship with wxneeded enforced. There's just
> too
In light of the current "slow-down" state this is not pressing but since
I had it ready I'll send it around.
Update extlib to 1.7.0, the same version opam installs when asked.
Switches to github hosting. Deletes dead MASTER_SITES. Don't know if a
new one should be added.
One tweak to a dependent
Christian Weisgerber writes:
> The next release, 6.0, is approaching fast. It's time to wind down
> the ports churn, focus on fixing problems and stop introducing them.
fwiw I have a security update coming for samba.
> Over the next few days, please stop importing new ports and regular
> updat
Qingshan Chen writes:
> Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
> m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
> the right people.
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, which
> is required by
Sorry for the double posting here. The message was originally posted on
m...@openbsd.org, and is being re-posted here, in the hope of reaching
the right people.
Hi All,
It seems that gcc-libs-4.9.3p3 collides with libgfortran-4.3.1p16, which
is required by gfortran-4.2.1p15. I have run into
On 2016/07/07 08:46, Nils Reuße wrote:
> > > -r-sr-xr-x 1 root auth 8736 Jul 5 04:33 /usr/libexec/auth/login_passwd
> > >
> > > /usr/local ist mounted with wxallowed. Any hints?
What mount flags do you have on /usr/local?
When you added wxallowed to /usr/local, did you accidentally also add
I just realized i had /usr/local mounted as 'nosuid'. Same on /home.
Please excuse the noise.
Nils
16 matches
Mail list logo
