Dear Colleague,
Qatar's rapidly expanding cities and growing population - as well as its
hosting of the forthcoming FIFA World Cup 2022 - have encouraged the Qatari
government to earmark billions of dollars for national transport infrastructure
projects.
With the infrastructure projects Q
2015/09/22 4:28 "Peter Kane" :
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> [...]
>
> Thanks for following up. I originally looked at some of the posts
> linked above and also got ibus-anthy working with leafpad. However, it
> needed leafpad to run as root (trying as an unprivileged use
2015-09-22 0:20 GMT+03:00 Ingo Schwarze :
> Seems useful information to me.
>
> OK?
> Ingo
>
>
> Index: ports.7
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man7/ports.7,v
> retrieving revision 1.103
> diff -u -r1.103 ports.7
> --- ports.7
On 2015/09/21 21:31, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Sep 17 07:30:23, st...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
> > update to libmagic (file) 5.25
>
> What is the relation of OpenBSD's own new file(1) to devel/libmagic?
No code relation. libmagic is a package built from sources of the old
file(1) (but only provides the
Seems useful information to me.
OK?
Ingo
Index: ports.7
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man7/ports.7,v
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -r1.103 ports.7
--- ports.7 24 Aug 2015 12:57:14 - 1.103
+++ ports.7 21 Sep
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015, Donovan Watteau wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> > Donovan Watteau writes:
> >
> > > On Sat, 29 Aug 2015, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >> On 2015/08/29 11:16, Donovan Watteau wrote:
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > Here's a new port for libdiscid,
On Sep 21 21:31:00, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Sep 17 07:30:23, st...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
> > update to libmagic (file) 5.25
>
> What is the relation of OpenBSD's own new file(1) to devel/libmagic?
>
> The magic(5) file used by file(1) is version 4.24, while
> the magic(4) file that comes with
On Sep 17 07:30:23, st...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
> update to libmagic (file) 5.25
What is the relation of OpenBSD's own new file(1) to devel/libmagic?
The magic(5) file used by file(1) is version 4.24, while
the magic(4) file that comes with libmagic is version 5.25.
Can libmagic use the /etc/mag
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> 2015/09/22 0:43 "Anthony J. Bentley" :
>>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Peter Kane writes:
>> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Stuart Henderson
>> > wrote:
>> > > On 2015/09/20 13:45, Peter Kane wrote:
>> > >> Hello
>> > >>
>> > >> I wanted to set up som
2015/09/22 0:43 "Anthony J. Bentley" :
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Peter Kane writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> > > On 2015/09/20 13:45, Peter Kane wrote:
> > >> Hello
> > >>
> > >> I wanted to set up some Japanese input
>
> jless, jvim, and kterm are all basically patch
Hi Peter,
Peter Kane writes:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2015/09/20 13:45, Peter Kane wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I wanted to set up some Japanese input
jless, jvim, and kterm are all basically patchsets on top of very old
forks of existing projects. None of
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 02:25:53PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Thanks, committed. I added comments to patches with the headers from
> https://github.com/opendnssec/SoftHSMv1/commit/e853dc5b34d00a09e3e114cb4914b06c01c72b1c.patch
>
Looks good to me, thanks!
--
Patrik Lundin
Hi Jan,
Jan Stary wrote on Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:46:13PM +0200:
> In zipcloak.1, zipnote.1 and zipsplit.1,
> the `zipfile' argument is way more intented with mandoc:
>
> - zipfile Zipfile to encrypt entries in
> +zipfile Zipfile to encrypt entries in
>
On 2015/09/21 14:59, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looking around I noticed NetBSD and Debian had a few (somewhat
> different) fixes for the softhsm tool creating some sensitive files with
> too wide permissions.
>
> This has been handled upstream in SOFTHSM-101:
> https://issues.opendnssec.o
Hello,
Looking around I noticed NetBSD and Debian had a few (somewhat
different) fixes for the softhsm tool creating some sensitive files with
too wide permissions.
This has been handled upstream in SOFTHSM-101:
https://issues.opendnssec.org/browse/SOFTHSM-101
It was merged to the development br
Hi,
here an update from 2.2.17a to a current 2.3.2.
Works for me so far on amd64 with postgres db and LDAP authentication.
Besides the usual upgrade procedure, the database shema
has to be updated this time too, see the pkg README.
I'm going to commit it at the end of the week if I don't hear
a
Hi Ports@
The following diff allows the building of the python bindings for
link-grammar, but to get it to work I have to do:
ln -fs _clinkgrammar.so.7.5 _clinkgrammar.so
in the /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/linkgrammar/ directory.
Should I add a post-install command to do this?
Th
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:39:10AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/09/21 10:31, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >
> > It's not that we don't trust you.
> > But I think it's the first time I see that softhsm2 would be a totally
> > different port (i.e. security/softhsm2).
> > If that's the case
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/09/20 13:45, Peter Kane wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I wanted to set up some Japanese input so I tried a few things out on
>> an i386 test machine running -current where they worked (more or less)
>> OK. When I tried to migrate some of th
On 2015/09/21 10:31, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:19:23AM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 06:06:44PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > portroach currently thinks security/softhsm is outdated. The reason for
> > > this is that while
On 2015/09/20 13:45, Peter Kane wrote:
> Hello
>
> I wanted to set up some Japanese input so I tried a few things out on
> an i386 test machine running -current where they worked (more or less)
> OK. When I tried to migrate some of them across to an amd64 machine
> running -current I got segfaults
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:19:23AM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 06:06:44PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > portroach currently thinks security/softhsm is outdated. The reason for
> > this is that while the version in ports is 1.3.7, there is a development
>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 06:06:44PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> portroach currently thinks security/softhsm is outdated. The reason for
> this is that while the version in ports is 1.3.7, there is a development
> release using a 2.0.0 version number.
>
> The diff below should limit th
23 matches
Mail list logo
