Re: Problem with chromium-40.0.2214.91p0

2015-01-27 Thread STeve Andre'
On 01/28/15 02:27, Benoit Lecocq (BLQ) wrote: On 01/28/15 06:24, STeve Andre' wrote: Chrome isn't working at the moment. The screen is sold black. If I start with chrome nytimes.com the title bar says New York Times, so chrome is working but doesn't display. I see an error message

Re: Problem with chromium-40.0.2214.91p0

2015-01-27 Thread Benoit Lecocq (BLQ)
On 01/28/15 06:24, STeve Andre' wrote: >Chrome isn't working at the moment. The screen is sold black. If > I start with chrome nytimes.com the title bar says New York Times, > so chrome is working but doesn't display. > >I see an error message > > ATTENTION: default value of option

Problem with chromium-40.0.2214.91p0

2015-01-27 Thread STeve Andre'
Chrome isn't working at the moment. The screen is sold black. If I start with chrome nytimes.com the title bar says New York Times, so chrome is working but doesn't display. I see an error message ATTENTION: default value of option force_s3tc_enable overridden by environment. [50:-195

Re: [CHANGE] Samba 3.6

2015-01-27 Thread Ian McWilliam
> On 27 Jan 2015, at 10:49 pm, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2015/01/27 21:54, Ian McWilliam wrote: >> The attached patch moves the share/examples/samba/LDAP/* files >> (mainly schema stuff) from the docs package to the main package. >> >> This was requested some time back by Marcus Merighi

clamav security update, any tests please?

2015-01-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
Hot off the presses, including fixes for various heap out of bounds conditions. http://blog.clamav.net/2015/01/clamav-0986-has-been-released.html I'm running this on amd64 and am in the process of testing on powerpc. Any additional tests would be appreciated (especially sparc64). Index: Makefile

Re: Missing WANTLIB entries (liblzma.so 1.0 vs. 2.0)

2015-01-27 Thread Nigel J Taylor
On 01/27/15 22:09, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Hi, > > last week, I noticed some build problems while running dpb -uR on > my build machine (sorry, no list of affected ports, because that > machine is now inop after a disk failure). If i remember correctly, > the ports in question > > - indirectly d

Re: Missing WANTLIB entries (liblzma.so 1.0 vs. 2.0)

2015-01-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/01/27 23:09, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Hi, > > last week, I noticed some build problems while running dpb -uR on > my build machine (sorry, no list of affected ports, because that > machine is now inop after a disk failure). If i remember correctly, > the ports in question > > - indirectly

Missing WANTLIB entries (liblzma.so 1.0 vs. 2.0)

2015-01-27 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, last week, I noticed some build problems while running dpb -uR on my build machine (sorry, no list of affected ports, because that machine is now inop after a disk failure). If i remember correctly, the ports in question - indirectly depend on textpric/libxml - lack a liblzma entry in WANTLI

Re: [UPDATE] pekwm-0.17

2015-01-27 Thread Timo Myyrä
Antoine Jacoutot writes: >> +WANTLIB += ICE SM X11 Xext Xft Xinerama Xpm Xrandr c iconv >> +WANTLIB += jpeg m png stdc++ > > When you have 'iconv' in WANTLIB, you want to use the converters/libiconv > MODULE and regen WANTLIB. Ah, still getting used to the MODULEs. Here's a new diff to update

Update mail/s-nail to 14.7.11

2015-01-27 Thread trondd
Easy update to 14.7.11 which fixes an IMAP crash I was having. Been using this on amd64 and zaurus for several weeks. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/s-nail/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -p -r1.10 Makefile

Release engineering for 5.7

2015-01-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
5.7 lock is approaching, so in order to help focus efforts in the right areas, it would be helpful if people could update to recent base and package snapshots and make sure things are working as expected. Reports of any problems seen in updates from 5.6 release to -current would be particularly us

Re: UPDATE: mcabber-0.10.3

2015-01-27 Thread Tim van der Molen
Markus Hennecke (2015-01-23 11:31 +0100): > Updates mcabber to 0.10.3. Thanks a lot to Tim van der Molen for sending > me the patch. Patch needs to be applied with the -E option, the patch > files are no longer needed. Could someone please commit this? Thanks. > Index: Makefile > ==

Re: java and IPv6: java.net.SocketException: Protocol family unavailable

2015-01-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/01/27 14:13, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Building Java eats up quite a bit of resources, however, would it be an > option to > also hook up the with_ipv6 FLAVOR to bulk builds, or alternatively, make this > the default? Hook up the flavour? Possibly, though it will increase my levels o

Re: java and IPv6: java.net.SocketException: Protocol family unavailable

2015-01-27 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 09:10 CET, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/01/27 08:29, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > > Anyways, with IPv6 disabled by default > > IPv6 isn't disabled by default, it's just that non-loopback interfaces no > longer have v6 addresses by default. > > > does this

Re: [CHANGE] Samba 3.6

2015-01-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/01/27 21:54, Ian McWilliam wrote: > The attached patch moves the share/examples/samba/LDAP/* files > (mainly schema stuff) from the docs package to the main package. > > This was requested some time back by Marcus Merighi so that they > do not have to install the docs package just for t

[CHANGE] Samba 3.6

2015-01-27 Thread Ian McWilliam
The attached patch moves the share/examples/samba/LDAP/* files (mainly schema stuff) from the docs package to the main package. This was requested some time back by Marcus Merighi so that they do not have to install the docs package just for the schema files. No other functional change. Ian M

Re: java and IPv6: java.net.SocketException: Protocol family unavailable

2015-01-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/01/27 08:29, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Anyways, with IPv6 disabled by default IPv6 isn't disabled by default, it's just that non-loopback interfaces no longer have v6 addresses by default. > does this with_ipv6 java flavor make sense at all? Yes. If ipv6 support was enabled in jdk by