Eric Lalonde writes:
> Soundtouch has gone through at least six releases since 1.3.1. Lots of
> beat detection improvements and bugfixes in that time.
>
> Changelog is Section 5 on this page:
> http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/README.html
>
> A number of patches are no longer necessary and have b
Hi ports@,
Soundtouch has gone through at least six releases since 1.3.1. Lots of beat
detection improvements and bugfixes in that time.
Changelog is Section 5 on this page:
http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/README.html
A number of patches are no longer necessary and have been removed:
patches/
Aaron Bieber writes:
Accidently only sent this to tedu@ :P
Ted Unangst writes:
On i386, it's better for a jit to ask for exec memory upfront, so uvm
knows to place it in the exec segment. Otherwise, if you mmap non-exec
and mprotect it, you wind up with a high mapping and the segment must
j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes:
> Bruno Flueckiger writes:
>
>> On 16.01.2015 01:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>>>
>>> I would zap it too. But feel free to discuss this with upstream and
>>> work with them to use the safer strl idiom. :)
>>> Even though this API is safer
Bruno Flueckiger writes:
> On 16.01.2015 01:29, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>>
>> I would zap it too. But feel free to discuss this with upstream and
>> work with them to use the safer strl idiom. :)
>> Even though this API is safer people have done mistakes in ports in the
>> past.
>>
>> Pl
On h, jan 19, 2015 at 18:53:48 +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On 01/19/15 17:13, David Coppa wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:06 AM, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> >
> >>>It might be better to look at the kqueue patch that FreeBSD are using.
> >>
> >>Now this seems to work for me on i386, at least.
On 01/19/15 17:13, David Coppa wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:06 AM, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
It might be better to look at the kqueue patch that FreeBSD are using.
Now this seems to work for me on i386, at least. It applied almost
clean, but I've taken the liberty and removed the whitespace-o
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:13:09PM +0100, David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:06 AM, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
>
> >> It might be better to look at the kqueue patch that FreeBSD are using.
> >
> > Now this seems to work for me on i386, at least. It applied almost
> > clean, but I've taken t
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:06 AM, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
>> It might be better to look at the kqueue patch that FreeBSD are using.
>
> Now this seems to work for me on i386, at least. It applied almost
> clean, but I've taken the liberty and removed the whitespace-only
> changes from FreeBSD's diff(
On Sunday, January 18, 2015 22:01 CET, Christian Weisgerber
wrote:
> My distinfo cleanup has uncovered a number of ports that aren't hooked
> up to the category Makefiles in the tree, i.e., they are never built
> in bulk builds. I can't quite tell if people forgot to add them or
> forgot to
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Eric Lalonde wrote:
> Done. OK?
Committed.
Cheers!
David
Hello!
Since this update fluxbox on my machine has become completely unusable,
it randomly crashes on opening any applications.
For example, xterm opens without crashing fluxbox with a 50-50 probability.
Please, be so kind and look at this problem, I can't use my computer. :)
Here is a backtrac
12 matches
Mail list logo