Re: minor fix for devel/check

2014-11-20 Thread Vadim Zhukov
21 нояб. 2014 г. 3:42 пользователь "Kaspars Bankovskis" < kasp...@bankovskis.net> написал: > > Hi, > > Currently, when linking your source against libcheck, you get an > annoying warning about unsafe usage of tempnam(3). The following > patch fixes that, by commenting out a block of code which, ac

Re: alternatives to procmail: security

2014-11-20 Thread Theo de Raadt
> So which of the suggested alternatives (fdm, sieved, ???) have > undergone a security audit or at least can claim that no problems > were found when using some of those "fuzzing" tools? Well the real answer here is that procmail hasn't undergone a security audit and has a claim that it just fail

Re: NEW: x11/mpv [0.6.2]

2014-11-20 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Anthony J. Bentley said: > There's at least one more obvious issue: when I pause music or > video, I can't unpause... Apparently the workaround in audio_resume() function was causing this bug. (Not sure why, as the function exited just fine.) Attached revision of the port fixes that by replacing

Re: alternatives to procmail: security

2014-11-20 Thread Claus Assmann
So which of the suggested alternatives (fdm, sieved, ???) have undergone a security audit or at least can claim that no problems were found when using some of those "fuzzing" tools? Before switching from procmail to something else it would be nice to know if that alternative is (more) secure.

minor fix for devel/check

2014-11-20 Thread Kaspars Bankovskis
Hi, Currently, when linking your source against libcheck, you get an annoying warning about unsafe usage of tempnam(3). The following patch fixes that, by commenting out a block of code which, according to comments above it, is supposed to solve issues with Windows, and shouldn't be relevant in O

Re: file permissions in a port

2014-11-20 Thread Fred
On 11/20/14 17:47, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2014/11/20 17:21, Fred wrote: On 11/20/14 17:14, Marc Espie wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:39:03AM -0500, Jiri B wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:17:34PM +, Fred wrote: Hi ports@ Can someone point me at the documentation for changing the

Re: NEW: archivers/innoextract

2014-11-20 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Donovan Watteau writes: > Here's a new version, with an explicit requirement on boost's latest > revision, as suggested by Landry. > > As for Doxygen: I don't see the point of requiring doxygen and > graphviz just for documenting API internals; it's just a tool, not > a library. I agree. Works

Re: NEW: archivers/innoextract

2014-11-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/11/20 21:28, Donovan Watteau wrote: > Here's a new version, with an explicit requirement on boost's latest > revision, as suggested by Landry. > > As for Doxygen: I don't see the point of requiring doxygen and > graphviz just for documenting API internals; it's just a tool, not > a library

Re: NEW: archivers/innoextract

2014-11-20 Thread Donovan Watteau
Here's a new version, with an explicit requirement on boost's latest revision, as suggested by Landry. As for Doxygen: I don't see the point of requiring doxygen and graphviz just for documenting API internals; it's just a tool, not a library. innoextract.tgz Description: Binary data

Re: file permissions in a port

2014-11-20 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Stuart Henderson said: > ~/.local/share/radiotray/config.xml isn't included in the package > anyway though, presumably it gets copied from /usr/local/share/... I suspect that Fred sets LOCALBASE=~/.local for testing purposes. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Re: file permissions in a port

2014-11-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/11/20 17:21, Fred wrote: > On 11/20/14 17:14, Marc Espie wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:39:03AM -0500, Jiri B wrote: > >>On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:17:34PM +, Fred wrote: > >>>Hi ports@ > >>> > >>>Can someone point me at the documentation for changing the file > >>>permissions in

Re: file permissions in a port

2014-11-20 Thread Fred
On 11/20/14 17:14, Marc Espie wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:39:03AM -0500, Jiri B wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:17:34PM +, Fred wrote: Hi ports@ Can someone point me at the documentation for changing the file permissions in a package? I'm working on porting radiotray[1] and have w

Re: file permissions in a port

2014-11-20 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:39:03AM -0500, Jiri B wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:17:34PM +, Fred wrote: > > Hi ports@ > > > > Can someone point me at the documentation for changing the file > > permissions in a package? > > > > I'm working on porting radiotray[1] and have wip port [2] but

Re: NEW: devel/afl

2014-11-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/11/21 01:11, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:40:13PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2014/11/21 00:14, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:44:08PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:08:32PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > >

Re: NEW: devel/afl

2014-11-20 Thread Daniel Dickman
a few thoughts. I'm not in love with changing CFLAGS if hostname is raccoon. i would make a choice to either include no-format or not. I would not run the regress tests as part of the main build but would disconnect it. this is how most ports work as far as I know. while my ulimit patch will l

Re: file permissions in a port

2014-11-20 Thread Jiri B
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:17:34PM +, Fred wrote: > Hi ports@ > > Can someone point me at the documentation for changing the file > permissions in a package? > > I'm working on porting radiotray[1] and have wip port [2] but I > noticed when testing it on i386 that the > ~/.local/share/radiotr

file permissions in a port

2014-11-20 Thread Fred
Hi ports@ Can someone point me at the documentation for changing the file permissions in a package? I'm working on porting radiotray[1] and have wip port [2] but I noticed when testing it on i386 that the ~/.local/share/radiotray/config.xml is installed with 444 permisions rather than 644 wh

Re: NEW: devel/afl

2014-11-20 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:40:13PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2014/11/21 00:14, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:44:08PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:08:32PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > > Here is a quick port of lcamtuf/Michal Zalews

Re: NEW: devel/afl

2014-11-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/11/21 00:14, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:44:08PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:08:32PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > Here is a quick port of lcamtuf/Michal Zalewski's instrumented fuzzer > > > 'American fuzzy lop'. Only tested on amd64

Re: NEW: devel/afl

2014-11-20 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:44:08PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:08:32PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > Here is a quick port of lcamtuf/Michal Zalewski's instrumented fuzzer > > 'American fuzzy lop'. Only tested on amd64 where it requires the binutils > > change I just

Re: NEW: devel/afl

2014-11-20 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:08:32PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > Here is a quick port of lcamtuf/Michal Zalewski's instrumented fuzzer > 'American fuzzy lop'. Only tested on amd64 where it requires the binutils > change I just committed to allow sahf/lahf instructions. > > http://lcamtuf.coredump

scantailor, has it anybody in his own ports tree?

2014-11-20 Thread Jiri B
hi, does anybody have scantailor in his own ports tree? so i do not waste time to solve some cmake issue with finding png16 library? :D j.

Re: NEW: x11/mpv [0.6.2]

2014-11-20 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Hi Alexandre, Alexandre Ratchov writes: > sorry, don't have the time to test & debug this right now, but a > quick look at the ao_sndio.c suggest that blocking mode is used, > while the device is opened in non-blocking mode: > > p->hdl = sio_open(p->dev, SIO_PLAY, 1); > ^^

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/11/20 10:23, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > "Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" writes: > > > Edd Barrett said: > >> +GH_TAGNAME = v${MODPY_EGG_VERSION} > >> +GH_COMMIT = 7770b5ff73737d1269eb1ba7554b8d3486c7f5ec > > > > Does it make sense to include both? Tags are supposed to identify >

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
"Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" writes: > Edd Barrett said: >> +GH_TAGNAME =v${MODPY_EGG_VERSION} >> +GH_COMMIT = 7770b5ff73737d1269eb1ba7554b8d3486c7f5ec > > Does it make sense to include both? Tags are supposed to identify > commit reliably... I don't think that tags are reliable. You can dele

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Edd Barrett said: > +GH_TAGNAME = v${MODPY_EGG_VERSION} > +GH_COMMIT = 7770b5ff73737d1269eb1ba7554b8d3486c7f5ec Does it make sense to include both? Tags are supposed to identify commit reliably... -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Re: NEW: x11/mpv [0.6.2]

2014-11-20 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Alexandre Ratchov said: > sorry, don't have the time to test & debug this right now, but a > quick look at the ao_sndio.c suggest that blocking mode is used, > while the device is opened in non-blocking mode: > > p->hdl = sio_open(p->dev, SIO_PLAY, 1); > ^^ > >

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Pierre-Emmanuel André
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:42:23AM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote: > I ended up creating basically the same patch, this is OK from me. > > I like sthen's comment to move the GH_COMMIT next to the > MODPY_EGG_VERSION, as well. > > (also adding the MAINTAINER to the email list) > > Looks good to me.

Re: UPDATE: mail/offlineimap

2014-11-20 Thread Peter Hessler
I ended up creating basically the same patch, this is OK from me. I like sthen's comment to move the GH_COMMIT next to the MODPY_EGG_VERSION, as well. (also adding the MAINTAINER to the email list) On 2014 Oct 30 (Thu) at 22:08:13 + (+), Edd Barrett wrote: :Hey, : :Update to offlineimap

Re: NEW: x11/mpv [0.6.2]

2014-11-20 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:45:45AM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Anthony J. Bentley said: > > Not sure if this is related, but sound is very choppy for me, and: > > > > AV: 00:05:23 / 01:40:58 (5%) A-V: 0.020 > > [ao/sndio] Blocking until remaining audio is played... (sndio design bug). > >

Re: NEW: x11/mpv [0.6.2]

2014-11-20 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 08:45:50PM -0700, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > "Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" writes: > > FWIW on my ThinkPad E325 the performance of mpv is really bad. (MPlayer > > does no good here either, although ffplay copes with everything just > > fine.) I also noticed that it has problems w

Re: NEW: x11/mpv [0.6.2]

2014-11-20 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:43:05AM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > Henrik Friedrichsen said: > > I understand. I have attached another version that fetches all the files > > in the fetch phase. > > > > Could you give it another try? > > I made some changes to the port. (See attached tarball