On 2014-10-19 22:07:15, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:52:27PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here's an update to bogofilter 1.2.4 - the version we have in-tree is
> > nearly 7 years old, and even if the motto "if it ain't broken dont fix
> > it" is strong among so
> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 21:21:21 +0100
> From: st...@openbsd.org
> To: kwesterb...@gmail.com
> CC: ren_zokuke...@hotmail.com; ports@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: building individual ports via MinGW
>
> On 2014/10/19 08:09, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> > On 19 October 2014 07:29, R . wrote:
> > > i k
Hi ports --
Attached is a new port, sysutils/lookat.
pkg/DESCR:
lookat is a program to view Un*x text files and manual pages. It is
inspired by the DOS program list.com, designed to be more user-friendly
than the standard Un*x pagers.
Think of it as a colorized, menuized less.
All patches in the
On 2014/10/19 08:09, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> On 19 October 2014 07:29, R . wrote:
> > i know that m4 comes bundled together as part of the OS and typically only
> > gets built every build of OpenBSD, but is there a way to compile just the
> > m4 under MinGW?? i only need the binaries, no nee
On 2014/10/19 18:32, Edd Barrett wrote:
> I guess what we would need to do is port each individual go dependency we
> need, then add a systrace policy that blocks the go build system from
> downloading dependencies. Any comments on that strategy?
systrace isn't the thing to use for this..
(Actual
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:52:27PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's an update to bogofilter 1.2.4 - the version we have in-tree is
> nearly 7 years old, and even if the motto "if it ain't broken dont fix
> it" is strong among some, there's been at least two CVEs since then:
> http://bo
Hi,
here's an update to the latest josm snapshot. I had to move away my
.josm/preferences.xml to make it start, but other than that seems to run
fine.
Landry
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/geo/josm/Makefile,v
retrieving rev
On 19 October 2014 13:32, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just tried porting a go application and ran into trouble. Looks like
> there are no go ports in-tree, and I think I know why.
>
> Go has one of these build systems that downloads (moving target)
> dependencies. It reminds me of node.
>
> Ha
Hey,
I just tried porting a go application and ran into trouble. Looks like
there are no go ports in-tree, and I think I know why.
Go has one of these build systems that downloads (moving target)
dependencies. It reminds me of node.
Has anyone else tried porting go stuff?
I guess what we would
Aaron Bieber writes:
> Hello!
>
> Long list of new ports. Figured I would send them all in one go. These
> are all fallout from a talk I gave for a CoBUG meeting on 3D printing!
>
> All of them together let you run OctoPrint (http://octoprint.org), I am
> working on a port for this.. but it has a
On 19 October 2014 07:29, R . wrote:
> i know that m4 comes bundled together as part of the OS and typically only
> gets built every build of OpenBSD, but is there a way to compile just the m4
> under MinGW?? i only need the binaries, no need for the manuals or things
> like that.
>
I would th
i know that m4 comes bundled together as part of the OS and typically only gets
built every build of OpenBSD, but is there a way to compile just the m4 under
MinGW?? i only need the binaries, no need for the manuals or things like that.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:23:00PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Aaron Bieber wrote:
>
> > I thought I was losing my mind.. couldn't figure out why we never
> > noticed this before.
> >
> > If we can't trick npm into thinking it has the modules already installed
> > it tries to
13 matches
Mail list logo