An update to ZNC 1.4.
OK?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/net/znc/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.20 Makefile
--- Makefile30 Apr 2014 14:12:19 - 1.20
+++ Makefile11 May 2014 01
On 13-May 8:33, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Could anyone with enough spare time try to - run make configure on
i386 - run make configure on whatever platform still uses gcc-3.3? [...]
A cvs diff is preferred; use 'cvs add' and 'cvs rm' to add/remove files,
then 'cvs diff -uNp'. Make sure the maintai
On 2014/05/05 07:56, Brad Smith wrote:
> Here is an update of FFmpeg to the 2.2 branch and an update to newer MPlayer.
>
> Already run through a bulk and everything in the tree has been fixed
> to use the newer API.
>
> OK?
As far as the ports tree goes I think we're in shape for this, Brad has
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:46:11PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> For instance, it means you can integrate this within sqlports, or have
> dpb build your port along with the rest.
And also, zhuk's script will tell you if the style is okay, or if small
pieces are missing.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:46:23PM +0200, Fabian Raetz wrote:
> Hi ports@,
>
> a few weeks ago i tried to integrate node packages
> into the OpenBSD ports tree but i finaly gave up after a while.
> Basically i tried to mimic the behavior of ruby/python/perl
> ports where each NPM package would g
2014-05-12 23:18 GMT+02:00 Markus Bergkvist :
> With this diff it picks up libsodium to libzmq but not to curve_keygen.
Yes it does. curve-keygen works fine. My mistake.
Thanks for the advice.
With this diff it picks up libsodium to libzmq but not to curve_keygen.
All regression tests pass, including the ones related to libsodium.
2014-05-12 18:40 GMT+02:00 Giovanni Bechis :
> On 05/12/14 18:03, viq wrote:
>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Markus Bergkvist
>> w
Hi ports@,
a few weeks ago i tried to integrate node packages
into the OpenBSD ports tree but i finaly gave up after a while.
Basically i tried to mimic the behavior of ruby/python/perl
ports where each NPM package would get its own Makefile Wrapper
in the portstree.
I remebered that there wa
Le 05/11/14 16:13, Kent Fritz a écrit :
Have you increased your per-process memory limit? Look at `ulimit
-a`. You can increase the datasize-cur for your login class in
/etc/login.conf. Some have suggested increasing the openfiles-cur,
but it depends on your browsing habits -- I've never run
anyone to commit new port?
Sergey Bronnikov
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Fred wrote:
> On 05/01/14 18:26, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 2014/05/01 21:17, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
>>
>>> On 18:26 Thu 01 May , Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>>>
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:13:11PM +0400, Sergey
The maintainer's address bounced, so taking maintainership.
Required for a future update to databases/p5-DBI.
With this "simple" command-line, I confirmed that version "1.405" is
greater than version "1.28", so no need for an epoch, yay!
perl -MOpenBSD::PackageName -E 'say
OpenBSD::PackageName:
Hi,
Trivial update for balance to 3.56
Ok?
Cheers.-
--
Sending from my toaster.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/balance/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.17 Makefile
--- Makefile11 Mar 2013 11:35:
On 05/12/14 18:03, viq wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Markus Bergkvist
> wrote:
>> I did an attempt to update zeromq to 4.0.4.
>> It builds fine, it is passing the tests, but I can't make it pick upp
>> libsodium. Any advice or anyone who is interested to pick this one up?
>
> No advic
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Markus Bergkvist
wrote:
> I did an attempt to update zeromq to 4.0.4.
> It builds fine, it is passing the tests, but I can't make it pick upp
> libsodium. Any advice or anyone who is interested to pick this one up?
No advice, but this issue could possibly affect a
On 2014/05/11 22:38, Andrew Fresh wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 01:24:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > OK as long as you've checked deps are still happy.
>
> The tests for all the direct dependents are still in the same state they
> were in before, all tests for pass except 00pod.t in p5
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 01:24:00PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> OK as long as you've checked deps are still happy.
The tests for all the direct dependents are still in the same state they
were in before, all tests for pass except 00pod.t in p5-Math-Symbolic.
Is there something in particular I
On 05/11/14 10:44, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I don't see any advantage to moving the 2 config files into
> share/examples/openfire/conf rather than just keeping them in
> share/examples/openfire as they are now.
The second file wasn't copied to examples, so i decided a new
subdirectory would mak
Benoit Lecocq schrieb am 11.05.2014 10:39:
> On 05/06/14 17:20, Nils R wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as Aaron pointed out, i was missing enum34 as a dependency for beets.
>>
>> Here is a port, comments welcome :)
>>
>> Nils
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> You can add :
>
> PKGNAME = py-${DISTNAME}
>
> and
>
>
Benoit Lecocq schrieb am 12.05.2014 09:40:
> Le 06/05/2014 15:36, Nils R a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is a dependency for beets.
>>
>> Nils
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> You can add :
>
> do-test:
> @${MODPY_TEST_TARGET}
>
> and a newline before COMMENT.
>
> Cheers,
> benoit
>
Hi Benoit,
h
On 2014/05/12 17:23, Graeme Lee wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'd like to submit a (mostly) updated the port for print/lilypond to from
> 2.14.2 to 2.18.2.
>
> This is my first go at ports. What is the recommended way to submit the
> updated port? Would a new tarball be ok? Or are patches to individual
>
Le 06/05/2014 15:36, Nils R a écrit :
Hi,
this is a dependency for beets.
Nils
Hi,
You can add :
do-test:
@${MODPY_TEST_TARGET}
and a newline before COMMENT.
Cheers,
benoit
Hello
I'd like to submit a (mostly) updated the port for print/lilypond to
from 2.14.2 to 2.18.2.
This is my first go at ports. What is the recommended way to submit the
updated port? Would a new tarball be ok? Or are patches to individual
files preferred? The port is based on the 2.14.2
22 matches
Mail list logo
