Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread STeve Andre'
On 09/11/13 05:21, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2013/09/11 12:06, niXman wrote: 2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson The error message gives quite a good clue: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC Maybe, but it doesn't speak to me about anything. Can y

Re: small www/apache-httpd fixes: rc script and readme

2013-09-11 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:38:54PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/09/11 22:26, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:50:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > This fixes two small issues with www/apache-httpd: > > > > > > - The rc script doesn't work out of the box be

small www/apache-httpd fixes: rc script and readme

2013-09-11 Thread Stefan Sperling
This fixes two small issues with www/apache-httpd: - The rc script doesn't work out of the box because it doesn't pass the -k option needed for 'start|stop|...' arguments. I hope my way of fixing it is appropriate, and welcome other suggestions. - The readme implies that chroot is not ava

Re: small www/apache-httpd fixes: rc script and readme

2013-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/11 22:26, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:50:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > This fixes two small issues with www/apache-httpd: > > > > - The rc script doesn't work out of the box because it doesn't pass > >the -k option needed for 'start|stop|...' argum

Re: small www/apache-httpd fixes: rc script and readme

2013-09-11 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:50:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > This fixes two small issues with www/apache-httpd: > > - The rc script doesn't work out of the box because it doesn't pass >the -k option needed for 'start|stop|...' arguments. I hope my >way of fixing it is appropriate, a

Re: UPDATE: cairo 1.12.16

2013-09-11 Thread Brad Smith
On 27/08/13 4:17 AM, Brad Smith wrote: An update to cairo 1.12.16. OK? ping. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/graphics/cairo/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.51 diff -u -p -r1.51 Makefile --- Makefile1 Jun 2013

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:14:23PM +0400, niXman wrote: > 2013/9/11 Tobias Ulmer: > > This is only the first of many many errors. There is no support for > > OpenBSD in vanilla gcc. > > Why not send patches to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org ? Because it's work. Do you volunteer? > > > -- > Regards,

Re: [NEW] Terminology-0.3.0

2013-09-11 Thread Azwaw OUSADOU
Thanks for looking ! I join to this mail a corrected version of port. 2013/9/9 Stuart Henderson > On 2013/09/09 13:04, Brian Callahan wrote: > > On 9/9/2013 12:51 PM, Azwaw OUSADOU wrote: > > >Hi ! > > > > > >I ported terminology, the terminal emulator supported by e17. > > > > > >Tested with an

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread niXman
2013/9/11 Tobias Ulmer: > Because it's work. Do you volunteer? Yes, I will, if someone will coordinate me. First of all, I need a description of what exactly problem is solved by each patch. -- Regards, niXman ___ Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW c

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread niXman
2013/9/11 Gregor Best : > If you understood what -fPIC meant, and if you understood the message, > it should be clear what you have to do. Let's say you know that I need to rebuild with '-fPIC'... Then tell me please, why gcc and libgcc are configured and built successfully, but libgomp is not?

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread niXman
2013/9/11 Tobias Ulmer: > This is only the first of many many errors. There is no support for > OpenBSD in vanilla gcc. Why not send patches to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org ? -- Regards, niXman ___ Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:01:23PM +0400, niXman wrote: > 2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > > "recompile with -fPIC" seems clear to me. If this doesn't mean anything > > to you, I don't think you should be trying to port GCC by yourself. > > I understand that. I do not understand what I have to rebuild

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread Gregor Best
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:01:23PM +0400, niXman wrote: > [...] > I understand that. I do not understand what I have to rebuild with '-fPIC'? > GCC? > [...] If you understood what -fPIC meant, and if you understood the message, it should be clear what you have to do. Might I ask why you are tryin

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread niXman
2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > "recompile with -fPIC" seems clear to me. If this doesn't mean anything > to you, I don't think you should be trying to port GCC by yourself. I understand that. I do not understand what I have to rebuild with '-fPIC'? GCC? /tmp/ccgLXgHL.o? Or something else? -- Regar

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/11 12:06, niXman wrote: > 2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > > The error message gives quite a good clue: > > > > relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; > > recompile with -fPIC > > Maybe, but it doesn't speak to me about anything. Can you help me? "recompile wi

Re: UPDATE: databases/py-sqlite

2013-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/11 10:47, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > On 09/11/13 00:45, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > > Major update to latest version, now it links with sqlite3 instead of > > sqlite2. > > Comments ? Ok ? > > Cheers > >Giovanni > > > As spotted by ajacoutot@, security/yubiserve needs this patch to wo

Re: UPDATE: databases/py-sqlite

2013-09-11 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On 09/11/13 00:45, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > Major update to latest version, now it links with sqlite3 instead of sqlite2. > Comments ? Ok ? > Cheers >Giovanni > As spotted by ajacoutot@, security/yubiserve needs this patch to work, I do not have a yubikey to test it with, any testers ? Ch

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:06:20PM +0400, niXman wrote: > 2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > > The error message gives quite a good clue: > > > > relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; > > recompile with -fPIC > > Maybe, but it doesn't speak to me about anything. Can you he

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread niXman
2013/9/11 Stuart Henderson > The error message gives quite a good clue: > > relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile > with -fPIC Maybe, but it doesn't speak to me about anything. Can you help me? -- Regards, niXman

Re: llvm and libc++

2013-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/11 09:05, niXman wrote: > Hi, > > Tell me please, why LLVM is built without clang-libc++[1] support? > > > [1] http://libcxx.llvm.org/ > > -- > Regards, > niXman > Not yet ported.

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/11 10:07, niXman wrote: > Hi, > > I try to build GCC-4.8.1 on pre 5.4 without ports and faced with the > following error when libgomp is configured: > configure:3664: checking for C compiler default output file name > configure:3686: /home/nixman/build/./gcc/xgcc > -B/home/nixman/build/

Re: Building GCC-4.8.1 without ports

2013-09-11 Thread Kirill Bychkov
On Wed, September 11, 2013 10:07, niXman wrote: > Hi, > > I try to build GCC-4.8.1 on pre 5.4 without ports and faced with the > following error when libgomp is configured: Any reason for building it outside ports-tree? > configure:3664: checking for C compiler default output file name > configur