Re: Update: lang/jruby 1.6.8 -> 1.7.3

2013-03-06 Thread Ted Unangst
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 22:18, Kurt Miller wrote: > Indeed. I didn't have the free time to switch 1.6 from JRL to GPL/OpenJDK > until just recently. Now there are packages for 1.6 too, so I think there's > little reason to force users to a higher version unless there are other > considerations.

Re: NEW: games/golly

2013-03-06 Thread Brian Callahan
On 3/2/2013 9:15 AM, Donovan Watteau wrote: Hello, Attached is a port for golly, a Conway's game of life simulator. I needed to patch it so that libutil is loaded along with libpython, otherwise I would get undefined symbols forkpty/openpty. My patch is similar to the one applied to py-gstream

Re: Update: lang/jruby 1.6.8 -> 1.7.3

2013-03-06 Thread Kurt Miller
On Wednesday 06 March 2013 9:45:48 pm Ted Unangst wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 20:22, Kurt Miller wrote: > > >> @@ -31,14 +29,15 @@ MODJAVA_VER = 1.7+ > > > > I noted that you have marked the port as 1.7+ but this page > > > > https://github.com/jruby/jruby > > > > indicates it is 1.6+. Pl

Re: Update: lang/jruby 1.6.8 -> 1.7.3

2013-03-06 Thread Jeremy Evans
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Kurt Miller wrote: > > I noted that you have marked the port as 1.7+ but this page > > https://github.com/jruby/jruby > > indicates it is 1.6+. Please consider using 1.6+ for additional > flexibility for users to chose which jdk to run it with. > Currently, the por

Re: Update: lang/jruby 1.6.8 -> 1.7.3

2013-03-06 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> Maybe things have changed, but as I recall marking a port as 1.6+ > requires 1.6 to build it. This was really annoying because there > aren't any 1.6 packages, so if I attempted to build jruby by hand, it > would go off into the weeds and fail at the manually download jdk 1.6 > part. > > they h

Re: Update: lang/jruby 1.6.8 -> 1.7.3

2013-03-06 Thread Ted Unangst
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 20:22, Kurt Miller wrote: >> @@ -31,14 +29,15 @@ MODJAVA_VER =1.7+ > > I noted that you have marked the port as 1.7+ but this page > > https://github.com/jruby/jruby > > indicates it is 1.6+. Please consider using 1.6+ for additional > flexibility for users to chose

Re: Update: lang/jruby 1.6.8 -> 1.7.3

2013-03-06 Thread Kurt Miller
On Tuesday 05 March 2013 6:11:53 pm Jeremy Evans wrote: > This updates to the latest version of JRuby, 1.7.3. The JRuby 1.7 > series was first released last October, but due to pthread issues > not fixed until after ports lock, we were not able to update to it > as it caused JRuby to segfault far

Re: Bitlbee OpenBSD resolver patch - testers needed

2013-03-06 Thread LEVAI Daniel
On sze, márc 06, 2013 at 20:29:44 +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:01:32PM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > > You can use Google Talk with Bitlbee, because it supports jabber, but on > > OpenBSD with one condition: you must specify the server name for the > > a

[update] net/sslh 1.11 -> 1.14

2013-03-06 Thread Björn Ketelaars
This update brings net/sslh from 1.11 to 1.14. Main changes: Added support for configuration file Corrected OpenVPN probe to support pre-shared secret mode Added an actual TLS/SSL probe Full changelog can be found at http://www.rutschle.net/tech/sslh.shtml Tested on amd64. OK? Index: Makefile =

Re: Bitlbee OpenBSD resolver patch - testers needed

2013-03-06 Thread Landry Breuil
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:01:32PM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote: > Hi! > > > You can use Google Talk with Bitlbee, because it supports jabber, but on > OpenBSD with one condition: you must specify the server name for the > account (eg.: 'account set server xmpp.l.google.com', because bitlbee's > SRV

Bitlbee OpenBSD resolver patch - testers needed

2013-03-06 Thread LEVAI Daniel
Hi! You can use Google Talk with Bitlbee, because it supports jabber, but on OpenBSD with one condition: you must specify the server name for the account (eg.: 'account set server xmpp.l.google.com', because bitlbee's SRV DNS queries don't work on OpenBSD [1]. Basically Bitlbee uses the ominous

[UPDATE] fdm-1.7

2013-03-06 Thread Sergey Bronnikov
Could anyone commit update for fdm port? I got 'OK' from maintainer (in CC). -- sergeyb@ diff -uprN -x CVS /usr/ports/mail/fdm/Makefile /usr/ports/mystuff/mail/fdm/Makefile --- /usr/ports/mail/fdm/MakefileSun Jan 13 14:24:33 2013 +++ /usr/ports/mystuff/mail/fdm/MakefileWed Mar 6

Re: [update] devel/p5-Try-Tiny

2013-03-06 Thread gar
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 05:26:14PM -0500, David Hill wrote: > update devel/p5-Try-Tiny to 0.12 > > please review. > > Index: Makefile > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/p5-Try-Tiny/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.7 > diff -u -p -r