Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2013/02/15 13:39, Hany Aziz wrote:
>> Are you referring to the precompiled binaries or to the ports that
>> will compile and is there another version of OpenBSD that will allow
>> more packages to install or compile on the Vax? In other words can I
>> install another
On 2013/02/15 13:39, Hany Aziz wrote:
> Are you referring to the precompiled binaries or to the ports that
> will compile and is there another version of OpenBSD that will allow
> more packages to install or compile on the Vax? In other words can I
> install another version of openbsd and have less
Remember that the GCC compiler on the VAX install is a modified gcc v 2.9.5.
Not sure if the error messages were even more cryptic then. Also not sure if
the fact that the machine I am using has only 32 megs of RAM is a factor. Once
I master SIMH I may try to run it under emulation on my x86 mac
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 06:44:17PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2013/02/15 18:28, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > emacs21,no_x11 fails reliably during link:
> >
> > Cool...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > it's pretty sad that only ~320 packa
On 2013/02/15 18:28, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Stuart Henderson writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > emacs21,no_x11 fails reliably during link:
>
> Cool...
>
> [...]
>
> > it's pretty sad that only ~320 packages built (and several of these
> > are just "recompress a bunch of files for things which
Are you referring to the precompiled binaries or to the ports that will compile
and is there another version of OpenBSD that will allow more packages to
install or compile on the Vax? In other words can I install another version of
openbsd and have less issues? All I really want is gcc, gdb, ema
Stuart Henderson writes:
[...]
> emacs21,no_x11 fails reliably during link:
Cool...
[...]
> it's pretty sad that only ~320 packages built (and several of these
> are just "recompress a bunch of files for things which aren't useful on
> vax anyway"). weird too though, there are various things
BTW the email earlier today will appear to be coming from "Charlie Root"
r...@bsd.bsd.vax
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Hany.
On Feb 15, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Hany Aziz wrote:
> Remember that the GCC compiler on the VAX install is a modified gcc v 2.9.5.
> Not sure if the error messages were even more cr
On 2013/02/15 15:38, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Thanks for your report, however I find this rather weird...
> Excerpt from emacs23_make.log:
gperf built ok on vax in the last -current package snapshot.
emacs21,no_x11 fails reliably during link:
cc -nostartfiles-L/usr/local/lib
Thanks for your report, however I find this rather weird...
Excerpt from emacs23_make.log:
[...]
===> Building for gperf-3.0.4
cd lib; make all
cc -O2 -pipe -I. -c ./getopt.c
cc -O2 -pipe -I. -c ./getopt1.c
c++ -O2 -pipe -I. -c ./getline.cc
c++ -O2 -pipe -I. -c ./hash.cc
rm -f libgp.a
ar rc libg
Jared Yanovich writes:
> Notes:
> - locale support is poorly hacked around by using 'luit' from X instead of a
>real locale(1)
Hi,
I just submitted a similar port, but I wonder about two things:
- how would luit replace locale(1)
(disclaimer: I don't know much about luit)
- you must have
Stuart Henderson writes:
[...]
> p5-IO-Tty is ok with me for after unlock.
>
> I don't like DESCR for mosh; 'Mosh is a "replacement" for SSH' - no
> it isn't..
I don't like it either; I just copy/pasted it from the website, but
added quotes around "replacement".
> : /* Disable path MTU disco
On 2013/02/15 14:18, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here's a port for mosh[1]; while I've only tested it lightly, it seems
> to work just fine. I don't think that importing it right now would cause
> problems, but *shrug*. I'm just posting it here so that people can test
> it.
>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:21:41AM +, Martin Crossley wrote:
> Successfully tested on 5.3/i386 current (snapshot 8 Feb) with
> ghostscript 9.06 (flavor 'a4').
>
> Now gstoraster and pstoqpdl (from SpliX) both work. Suspect that
> cups too will now be un-borked: will test that later.
>
Furthe
Gah, just like my previous submission I forgot to check the mailing-list
archive. *sigh*
--
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
GPG Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
Hi folks,
Here's a port for mosh[1]; while I've only tested it lightly, it seems
to work just fine. I don't think that importing it right now would cause
problems, but *shrug*. I'm just posting it here so that people can test
it.
mosh needs p5-IO-Tty, you'll find both ports attached.
Some note
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Matthias Kilian
wrote:
> I already have an ok from aja@, but I'd like to get a second ok.
You have mine, fwiw...
> Ciao,
> Kili
Cheers,
David
> ps: diff for stable:
>
> Index: Makefile
>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:21:41AM +, Martin Crossley wrote:
> > The diff below should fix it (on -current). It makes sure that the
> > cups driver is compiled with the same value for GX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE
> > as everything else.
>
> You, sir, rock.
>
> Successfully tested on 5.3/i386 current (
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:07:00PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> The diff below should fix it (on -current). It makes sure that the
> cups driver is compiled with the same value for GX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE
> as everything else.
You, sir, rock.
Successfully tested on 5.3/i386 current (snapshot 8 Feb
19 matches
Mail list logo
