Re: Parallel cmake (was: Re: boost 1.52.0 status)

2012-12-11 Thread David Coppa
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Brad Smith wrote: > The use of GNU make like this seems bogus. I take it CMake > isn't doing something right. Hi, I've found another (related) problem. $MAKE_PROGRAM is not honored and cmake picks gmake up if it's installed (even without USE_GMAKE=Yes). >From cmake-2.8.10.

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2012-12-11 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:58:05PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/12/11 19:54, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > > On 12/11/12 19:49, David Coppa wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Giovanni Bechis > > > wrote: > > >> Update to latest version, a lua.port.mk diff is needed to build it

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2012-12-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/12/11 19:54, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > On 12/11/12 19:49, David Coppa wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Giovanni Bechis > > wrote: > >> Update to latest version, a lua.port.mk diff is needed to build it because > >> it needs at least lua 5.2. > >> Comments ? Hints ? Ok ? > >> C

Re: boost 1.52.0 status

2012-12-11 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> > > what about having DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel ? > > > > Not sure about that. Someone else who is familiar with this feature should > > comment as to whether it should be added or not. > > You run a build with MAKE_JOBS=1 and one with MAKE_JOBS=2 (or better 4 > if you have the hardware) and comp

Re: Parallel cmake (was: Re: boost 1.52.0 status)

2012-12-11 Thread Amit Kulkarni
>> > > I tried with USE_GMAKE = Yes and it drives all cores >> > > >> > > so I think please add CONFIGURE_ARGS = --parallel=${MAKE_JOBS} and >> > > USE_GMAKE = Yes and then both configure and build will go parallel. >> > > >> > >> > Please just let me know what should I do, because I know nothi

Re: Parallel cmake (was: Re: boost 1.52.0 status)

2012-12-11 Thread Brad Smith
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:22:27PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > >> Which does absolutely nothing. MAKE_JOBS has no effect on cmake. > > >> The build is strictly sequential. > > >> > > >> You can parallelize the bootstrap phase with > > >> CONFIGURE_ARGS += --parallel=${MAKE_JOBS} > > >> but the

Re: Parallel cmake (was: Re: boost 1.52.0 status)

2012-12-11 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> >> Which does absolutely nothing. MAKE_JOBS has no effect on cmake. > >> The build is strictly sequential. > >> > >> You can parallelize the bootstrap phase with > >> CONFIGURE_ARGS += --parallel=${MAKE_JOBS} > >> but the main build remains sequential so the overall gain is > >> negligible. > >>

Re: Parallel cmake (was: Re: boost 1.52.0 status)

2012-12-11 Thread David Coppa
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> Which does absolutely nothing. MAKE_JOBS has no effect on cmake. >> The build is strictly sequential. >> >> You can parallelize the bootstrap phase with >> CONFIGURE_ARGS += --parallel=${MAKE_JOBS} >> but the main build remains sequential s

Re: new: net/tinc

2012-12-11 Thread Gregor Best
Ping? Is there more testing needed or are there other issues preventing this port from being included in the ports tree? -- Gregor Best

Re: Parallel cmake (was: Re: boost 1.52.0 status)

2012-12-11 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> Which does absolutely nothing. MAKE_JOBS has no effect on cmake. > The build is strictly sequential. > > You can parallelize the bootstrap phase with > CONFIGURE_ARGS += --parallel=${MAKE_JOBS} > but the main build remains sequential so the overall gain is > negligible. > > I haven't been able t

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2012-12-11 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On 12/11/12 19:49, David Coppa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Giovanni Bechis > wrote: >> Update to latest version, a lua.port.mk diff is needed to build it because >> it needs at least lua 5.2. >> Comments ? Hints ? Ok ? >> Cheers >> Giovanni > > imho this is not right. > Just se

Re: UPDATE: net/nmap

2012-12-11 Thread David Coppa
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > Update to latest version, a lua.port.mk diff is needed to build it because it > needs at least lua 5.2. > Comments ? Hints ? Ok ? > Cheers > Giovanni imho this is not right. Just set MODLUA_VERSION=5.2 into net/nmap/Makefile ciao, Dav

UPDATE: net/nmap

2012-12-11 Thread Giovanni Bechis
Update to latest version, a lua.port.mk diff is needed to build it because it needs at least lua 5.2. Comments ? Hints ? Ok ? Cheers Giovanni Index: lua.port.mk === RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/lua/lua.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.

Parallel cmake (was: Re: boost 1.52.0 status)

2012-12-11 Thread Christian Weisgerber
David Coppa wrote: > If ok, I will add [DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel] to cmake. Which does absolutely nothing. MAKE_JOBS has no effect on cmake. The build is strictly sequential. You can parallelize the bootstrap phase with CONFIGURE_ARGS += --parallel=${MAKE_JOBS} but the main build remains sequen

Re: boost 1.52.0 status

2012-12-11 Thread Amit Kulkarni
>> > what about having DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel ? >> >> Not sure about that. Someone else who is familiar with this feature should >> comment as to whether it should be added or not. > > You run a build with MAKE_JOBS=1 and one with MAKE_JOBS=2 (or better 4 > if you have the hardware) and compare th

Re: boost 1.52.0 status

2012-12-11 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Brad Smith wrote: > > what about having DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel ? > > Not sure about that. Someone else who is familiar with this feature should > comment as to whether it should be added or not. You run a build with MAKE_JOBS=1 and one with MAKE_JOBS=2 (or better 4 if you have the hardware) an

UPDATE: Adsuck-2.5.0

2012-12-11 Thread Gonzalo L. R.
Hi, Update for Adsuck to 2.5.0: * Automatically watch for changes to resolv.conf and reread it when that happens. * Refresh all the hosts files. * Start using libevent2 in favor of libevent Ok? Comments? Cheers. -- Sending from my VCR... Index: Makefile

Re: redland-bindings

2012-12-11 Thread David Gwynne
the perl bindings are working well for me. On 13/11/2012, at 1:31 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Here's a redland-bindings port, which requires the recently commited > updates to RDF libs. Based on a port from dlg, I've tweaked the multi > packages stuff. > > Usual problem with the Perl bindings

Re: boost 1.52.0 status

2012-12-11 Thread Amit Kulkarni
>>> > what about having DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel ? >>> >>> Not sure about that. Someone else who is familiar with this feature should >>> comment as to whether it should be added or not. >> >> I've done at least half a dozen builds with boost 1.42.0 marked that way >> without any problems, it is on

Re: boost 1.52.0 status

2012-12-11 Thread David Coppa
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/12/10 13:21, Brad Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:04:41AM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> > what about having DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel ? >> >> Not sure about that. Someone else who is familiar with this feature should >>

Re: [update] devel/libevent2

2012-12-11 Thread David Coppa
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:42 PM, David Hill wrote: > update libevent2 to 2.0.21. > > Tested with transmission and cyphertite on i386. > > Please test and commit. Tested and builds/works ok. I'll commit this later today, if nobody beats me. Ciao, David

Re: FW: Re: [ipxe-devel] [OpenBSD] 'internal compiler error: Segmentation' or 'Error: bad expression used with @GOTOFF' fault]

2012-12-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/12/10 17:56, Jiri B wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to make IPXE running on OpenBSD and got this reply from > IPXE guy asking for binutils version - huh, how to check it? > My OpenBSD install was some last November snapshot for amd64. > 2.15 (2004 vintage), yes it's old, and yes there are reaso

Re: FW: Re: [ipxe-devel] [OpenBSD] 'internal compiler error: Segmentation' or 'Error: bad expression used with @GOTOFF' fault]

2012-12-11 Thread Landry Breuil
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:56:56PM -0500, Jiri B wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to make IPXE running on OpenBSD and got this reply from > IPXE guy asking for binutils version - huh, how to check it? ld -v, as -v... you know what binutils is, right ?