Re: UPDATE: sysutils/runit 2.1.1 & rc.d script

2012-12-09 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Hi, runsvdir and runit-init work fine so far on i386 (-current), even if I find it weird that upstream goes back to /service - I just symlinked /service to /var/service, the ''install -d /service'' step in rc_pre() does respect that. etc/openbsd/3 would obviously need patching to work properly ou

Re: new: net/tinc

2012-12-09 Thread Gregor Best
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 11:08:02PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > [...] > USE_GROFF=Yes > [...] An updated port is attached. Should I write an introductory paragpraph like the other "New: foo/bar" mails do for other ports? -- Gregor Best net-tinc.tbz Description: Binary data

Re: new: net/tinc

2012-12-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/12/09 22:16, Gregor Best wrote: > Hi ports@, > > I am trying to create a port for the tinc VPN daemon. Attached are my > efforts this far, but they are not yet perfect. > > tinc.conf.5 contains syntax errors which I was unable to fix. Mandoc complains > > "FATAL: child violates par

Re: Importing supercollider-3.6.1 and about boost

2012-12-09 Thread Brad Smith
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 03:30:49PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 08:02:01 -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > > Mark as BROKEN-hppa, triggers an ICE in src/tr1/assoc_laguerre.cpp, > > > apparently related the switch to PIE and the fact that boost uses > > > precompiled .gch headers.

Re: Importing supercollider-3.6.1 and about boost

2012-12-09 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
With boost-1.52.0 from jasperla/openbsd-wip supercollider-3.6.1 builds fine, I needed to make some patches for it to build, I'm sending them upstream, but I still have lots of runtime errors, will work with upstream on that. Thanks. On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > I'm

new: net/tinc

2012-12-09 Thread Gregor Best
Hi ports@, I am trying to create a port for the tinc VPN daemon. Attached are my efforts this far, but they are not yet perfect. tinc.conf.5 contains syntax errors which I was unable to fix. Mandoc complains "FATAL: child violates parent syntax" if anyone could give me a hint on how to

Re: Importing supercollider-3.6.1 and about boost

2012-12-09 Thread Vadim Zhukov
2012/12/8 Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda : > I'm trying to import supercollider-3.6.1 into > our ports system, but it needs devel/boost > at least 1.50.0 I'm looking into how to update it > but I saw a lot of messages lately about > devel/boost problems with PIE or something like that > > is devel/bo

Re: new: net/bitcoin

2012-12-09 Thread Gregor Best
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 05:09:56PM +0100, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > [...] > ok? There seems to be one superflouus file, patches/patch-srd_db.cpp.org. Can't say anything else yet, it's still building. -- Gregor Best

Re: new: net/bitcoin

2012-12-09 Thread Pascal Stumpf
On Sat, 26 May 2012 15:44:31 +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote: > Bitcoin is an experimental new digital currency that enables instant > payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer > technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions > and issuing money are car

Re: Importing supercollider-3.6.1 and about boost

2012-12-09 Thread Pascal Stumpf
On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 08:02:01 -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > Mark as BROKEN-hppa, triggers an ICE in src/tr1/assoc_laguerre.cpp, > > apparently related the switch to PIE and the fact that boost uses > > precompiled .gch headers. This is no longer true since base gcc is now compiled as non-PIE. Some

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread John Long
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 02:01:21PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Sorry I've not got time for a detailed answer to the whole mail right now, > but updating one port to -current without also updating dependencies > is often going to fail (especially for things like this which have > many dep's).

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
Sorry I've not got time for a detailed answer to the whole mail right now, but updating one port to -current without also updating dependencies is often going to fail (especially for things like this which have many dep's). Since 5.2 there has been quite a lot of cleanup of system headers, so vario

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 02:32:14PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 02:16:21PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 12:30:38PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Probably better to look around and see what more information you can find > > > about what's

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread John Long
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 07:39:38AM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > How much space should I allocate to /usr/ports to be able to build anything > > in the tree at this point? Looking at the man page for ports and bsd.port.mk > > I am not sure whether moving the work directory elsewhere (I have plent

Re: UPDATE: TeX Live 2012

2012-12-09 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 01:00:29AM +, Edd Barrett wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:16:41AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > Using the patch provided by sthen, it doesn't build for me on amd64: > > > > http://junkpile.org/tl.diff.2 - texlive-base builds on -current now > > (following the

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> How much space should I allocate to /usr/ports to be able to build anything > in the tree at this point? Looking at the man page for ports and bsd.port.mk > I am not sure whether moving the work directory elsewhere (I have plenty of > space in var) would work or whether everything needs to be in

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 02:16:21PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 12:30:38PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Probably better to look around and see what more information you can find > > about what's happening. Describing the screen painting problem might be > > useful (

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 12:30:38PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Probably better to look around and see what more information you can find > about what's happening. Describing the screen painting problem might be > useful (i.e. what you do, what you see). I've been having problems with fonts in

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread John Long
Thanks for the explanations Stuart. I didn't look into the problem too much before trying to build the port because I figured it might be a problem with the package. After your reply I realize this is a tough situation. > > Is libreoffice known to be broken on AMD64 5.2-stable? > > I don't have a

Re: How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/12/09 08:37, John Long wrote: > I did a pkg_add for Libreoffice on 5.2 stable and when I run libreoffice I > get errors about a size mismatch in libstdc++ and the screen is not painted > properly. I tried to build the port but I don't have enough space allocated. The size mismatch errors a

How to size /usr/ports? And is libreoffice for 5.2 known to be broken?

2012-12-09 Thread John Long
I did a pkg_add for Libreoffice on 5.2 stable and when I run libreoffice I get errors about a size mismatch in libstdc++ and the screen is not painted properly. I tried to build the port but I don't have enough space allocated. Is libreoffice known to be broken on AMD64 5.2-stable? How much space